United States: Choice Of Forum In Federal Excise Tax Refund Cases

Taxpayers seeking a refund of the Internal Revenue Service's administrative decision to impose additional excise tax may petition either the U.S. district courts or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.  Choosing the best refund forum is one of the most significant decisions that must be made when tax litigation is imminent.  The authors provide some practice points in deciding in which court to seek redress.

Introduction

To challenge an administrative determination and assessment of a federal excise tax, a taxpayer has a choice of two different federal courts to bring an action:  the U.S. district courts and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.  The choice of a refund forum is one of the most significant decisions that must be made when tax litigation is imminent.

Refund Jurisdiction

The jurisdictional statute for refund suits in the district courts is found in 28 U.S.C. §1346, and provides that the federal district courts have original jurisdiction over suits for the recovery of internal revenue taxes.   This would also cover any issues relating to penalties and interest associated with the taxes.

Similarly, the Court of Federal Claims has concurrent jurisdiction with the district courts over suits for the recovery of taxes erroneously and illegally assessed by the United States.  See 28 U.S.C. § 1491.

Things to Consider

In deciding whether to seek a refund in the district court or the Court of Federal Claims, a taxpayer should consider several issues in determining the most advantageous forum.

Is There Any Controlling Judicial Precedent?

One of the primary considerations in determining which court to litigate your refund case is the existence of any controlling legal authority.  All courts must follow a controlling decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.  Similarly, each district court must follow the legal precedent announced by the U.S. Court of Appeals to which an appeal would lie.  For example, if the taxpayer's principal place of business is located in New York City, the taxpayer's refund action could be brought in the district court for the Southern District of New York, and the appeal from a final decision would lie in the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  Alternatively, the taxpayer could bring a refund action in the Court of Federal Claims, and the appeal from a final decision would lie in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC).

If, in our example, there is favorable case law in the Second Circuit, then the taxpayer would prefer to bring the action in the district court for the Southern District of New York because the Second Circuit case law would be controlling precedent.  Alternatively, if the case law in the Second Circuit is unfavorable but the CAFC has not addressed the issue, the taxpayer would likely prefer to bring the action in the Court of Federal Claims because Second Circuit case law does not bind that court.  Before you pick the court in which to litigate your refund case, it is critical to research the state of the law on your issue in each available forum.

Can You Litigate By Paying Only Part of the Tax?

Generally, a district court or the Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction over a tax refund suit unless the taxpayer has fully paid the amount of the tax assessment.  In Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145 (1960), the Supreme Court resolved the issue of whether 28 U.S.C. § 1346 requires full payment of the tax in issue or only a partial payment.  The Supreme Court held that the full payment of the tax was a prerequisite to the court's jurisdiction   The Flora rule is applicable to the Court of Federal Claims as well as to district courts.  See DiNatale v. United States, 12 Cl. Ct. 72 (Cl. Ct. 1987).

A different rule applies to a divisible tax.  Those taxes are imposed on and may be divided among individual transactions and include alcohol excise taxes.  The taxpayer with a divisible tax is considered to make full payment for purposes of the court's jurisdiction if the taxpayer pays the tax for a single transaction during the applicable period.  See Steele v. United States, 280 F.2d 89 (8th Cir. 1960);Spivak v. UnitedStates, 370 F.2d 612 (2d Cir. 1967).  The district courts and the Court of Federal Claims recognize that full payment of an excise tax is made when the tax on an individual transaction for each period in issue is paid before the suit is filed.  If a taxpayer takes this approach and does not pay all of the disputed tax, the taxpayer may be required to post a bond or letter of credit for the balance in order stop the government from using its administrative collection tools to collect the balance.  Additionally, the taxpayer should expect that the government will assert a counterclaim during litigation for the unpaid balance in response to taxpayer's complaint.

The court in Flora also ruled that the full-payment rule did not require the payment of interest, unless the taxpayer challenged the amount of interest:  "In some of the cases the only amount remaining unpaid at time of suit was interest.  As we have indicated, the statute lends itself to a construction which would permit suit for the tax after full payment thereof without payment of any part of the interest." Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145 (1960) at n.37(d) ; see also Kell-Strom Tool Co. v. United States 205 F. Supp. 190 (D. Conn. 1962); Leeke v. United States, 737 F. Supp. 1013 (S.D. Ohio 1990) (accord).  In Shore, for example, the CAFC settled the question by holding that the interest portion of an assessment need not be paid under the full-payment rule.  Shore v. United States, 9 F.3d 1524 (Fed. Cir. 1993). The CAFC said, however, that the full-payment rule referred to the tax only, not to interest and penalties.

Where the taxpayer disputes the computation of interest, however, it must pay the full amount of the interest.  See Magnone v. United States, 733 F. Supp. 613 (S.D.N.Y. 1989), aff'd, 902 F.2d 192 (2d Cir. 1990). If the taxpayer intends to challenge the assessment of a penalty, it must pay in full the amount of the penalty.  See, e.g., Professional Eng'rs, Inc. v. United States, 527 F.2d 597, 599 (4th Cir. 1975) (delinquency penalty); Francis v. United States, 89-1 USTC ¶ 9229 (D. Nev. 1988) (same).  Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance, however, states that penalties may also be divisible if the penalty is separately imposed on distinct transactions. See IRS Ch. Couns. Adv. Mem. 201315017 (Apr. 12, 2013) [stating that penalties for failure to file information returns under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 6721 and failure to furnish payee statements under IRC section 6722 are both divisible penalties because each penalty arises from a separate transaction; the imposition of the penalty, or amount thereof, depends on the circumstances of that single transaction, and the reasonable cause exception must be reviewed per occurrence].

Can the Government Assert Additional Tax Liability?

Once the period for assessment has expired, the government cannot assess additional amounts of tax.  But if the taxpayer has filed a refund suit for the same tax period, the government can assert an offset up to the amount of the taxpayer's refund claim.  Although one would expect the government to carry the burden of proof on additional tax that it proposes as an offset, the U.S. Supreme Court has concluded that the taxpayer has the burden of proof on any IRS offset, since the taxpayer must prove that it overpaid its taxes.  See Lewis v. Reynolds, 284 U.S. 281, 283 (1932: A).

What Are the Settlement Procedures?

The Tax Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has settlement authority in cases litigated in the Court of Federal Claims and district courts.  A prior settlement proposal made by the government agency at the administrative level may or may not be allowed by the Justice Department.  The Justice Department generally seeks the views of the government agency with respect to any settlement offer being considered, but the DOJ makes the ultimate settlement decision.  There is, however, a required additional level of review by the Joint Committee on Taxation for any settlement providing for a refund in excess of $2 million.  See Section 6405.

How Do District Courts and Court of Federal Claims Differ?

In a suit filed in the district court, the taxpayer or the government may ask for a trial by jury.  Juries are not available in suits filed in the Court of Federal Claims.  The district courts hear few federal tax cases and generally lack tax expertise.  The Court of Federal Claims has limited jurisdiction that generally is limited to patent disputes, claims against the government (including federal contract disputes) and tax refund suits.

Place of Trial

A district court may present a more convenient forum for the taxpayer because the taxpayer's principal place of business is located in proximity to the court.  The Court of Federal Claims is located in Washington, D.C.  Thus, it may be more difficult to arrange the schedule of out-of-state witnesses.  The difference in locations will not be relevant if the issue is a legal issue that will be decided on motions for summary judgment.

Discovery

The Court of Federal Claims and the district courts permit all typical forms of discovery.  For example, both courts permit the taking of depositions, formal requests for information and documents and the issuing of subpoenas to third parties.  Notwithstanding the mandatory disclosure obligations imposed by each court's procedural rules, discovery can and usually is very expensive and intensive in both courts.

Rules of Evidence

Litigants in the Court of Federal Claims are bound by the rules of evidence applicable in the CAFC.  Similarly, the district courts follow the Federal Rules of Evidence and the case law stated by the applicable court of appeals with appellate review.  Minor differences exist between these discrete sets of evidence rules, but generally those differences would not be sufficient alone to choose to litigate a refund case in one court or the other.

Government Counsel

In cases lying in both the Court of Federal Claims and the district courts, lawyers in the DOJ Tax Division represent the government.  Each case is assigned to a trial lawyer in one of the Civil Trial Sections, e.g., Court of Federal Claims Section or Northern Region.  Government counsel in the Court of Federal Claims Section is known to independently identify government offsets.

Conclusion

The most important consideration in choosing a refund forum is the controlling case law.  When the case presents an issue of first impression, the taxpayer should look more generally to the recent tax decisions in these courts as well as other factors, including the potential for a jury trial, whether the cases will be decided on motions for summary judgment and potential for government offsets.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions