ARTICLE
25 March 2014

Supreme Court Accepts Certiorari In Security Screening Case

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
We’ve written at least twice now on class actions on of time spent by employees going through security lines, primarily at the end of their shifts.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

We've written at least twice now on class actions arising out of time spent by employees going through security lines, primarily at the end of their shifts.   The question is whether and when such time might be compensable under the Portal-to-Portal Act.  One of the critical issues is whether the security is being undertaken primarily for the benefit of the employer.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on the first of these cases, in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, Case No. 13-433 (U.S. S. Ct., Mar. 3, 2014).  This case will likely not only shed light on the precise issue of time spent in security lines, but also on a host of issues regarding compensable time.  The Court's ultimate ruling may clarify the substantive law, but will also impact class litigation in this context depending on the test it employs and the degree to which it ultimately dictates the need for an individualized inquiry.

The Bottom Line:  The Supreme Court continues to express interest in cases relating to the definition of time worked under the FLSA and has accepted certiorari in a case that may shed further light on the issue.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More