ARTICLE
6 February 2014

ECJ Upholds ESMA’s Emergency Powers Under The Short Selling Regulation

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
On 22 January 2014, the European Court of Justice issued its judgment on the UK’s challenge of ESMA’s powers under the Short Selling Regulation.
United States Finance and Banking

On 22 January 2014, the European Court of Justice (the "ECJ") issued its judgment on the UK's challenge of ESMA's powers under the Short Selling Regulation. The UK government sought the annulment of Article 28 of the Short Selling Regulation which allows ESMA to intervene, in the absence of action or adequate action by the national regulator, in a Member State's financial markets in the event of a threat to the orderly functioning and integrity of financial markets or to the stability of the whole or part of the financial system in the European Union. ESMA is able to impose disclose obligations as well as ban short selling. There is no appeal against the ECJ decision. A copy of the judgment is available at: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/2014/C27012.html.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More