United States: The Joint Study And Bidding Agreement

Last Updated: February 5 2014

Where a number of parties contemplate submitting an application for the award of a new licence on a consortium basis, the Joint Study and Bidding Agreement ("JSBA") is intended to govern the relationship between them and the terms upon which their consortium application will be made. The JSBA acts as a precursor to the fully termed joint operating agreement ("JOA") in that it governs the relationship of the parties prior to the award of a licence whilst the JOA governs the relationship of the parties after the award (if the application is successful).

It is common (and recommended) for the JSBA to set out the high-level terms which will govern the consortium following the award of the licence. Agreeing those terms in the JSBA allows possible contentions between the consortium members to be identified early and addressed before the licence is issued. Investing time in the content of the JSBA helps avoid a fractious consortium and costly inefficiencies later.

Although the JSBA appears to be a straightforward, short-term agreement1, the importance of its content and purpose should not be underestimated. The following considerations will be key:

1. Prior to Entry

Prior to the commencement of the negotiation of the JSBA, the parties should assess what they each offer to the consortium (and also what they expect the others to offer). These discussions invariably involve the disclosure of commercially sensitive information, thus necessitating the entry by the parties into a confidentiality agreement prior to having detailed discussions. It may be that a certain party brings significantly more value to the consortium than the others if it is in sole possession of certain high value information. In order for it to disclose such information to the consortium it may seek a higher level of comfort in respect of the maintenance of its confidentiality than is the norm in a standard confidentiality agreement by, for example, seeking certain indemnities from the parties. Parties should therefore consider that there may be some debate in the negotiation of the confidentiality agreement, and parties with less (or no) confidential information to share will accordingly be less concerned about the confidentiality aspects of their relationship.

Additionally, the parties should be aware that there could be area of mutual interest agreements ("AMIAs") already in existence which bind potential consortium members. The effect of these preexisting arrangements on the composition of the intended consortium will need to be considered carefully.

2. Commencement without Agreeing the JSBA

It is not uncommon that due to time pressures, whilst still negotiating the JSBA a consortium could find itself at the point of making a licence application without the agreed JSBA in place. In this circumstance there is the risk that a party might not act in the spirit of what the parties are attempting to agree in the JSBA, for example, by focusing its resources on another potential application in the licence round or by not taking certain actions prior to an intended deadline. This will waste time and deflect attention from the matters in hand. In reality therefore there is no substitute for agreeing the JSBA as soon as possible.

3. Delay in Agreeing the JOA

Conceptually, as the precursor to the JOA, the JSBA is a short-term agreement intended to operate in the period between the licence being awarded and the JOA being finalised. However, it is not uncommon for the negotiation of the JOA to take considerable time and be subject to lengthy contention, particularly if the parties are from different jurisdictions and have varying degrees of experience in dealing with the UK continental shelf ("UKCS"). A prolonged negotiation of the JOA will result in extending the duration of the reliance of the consortium on the JSBA as the vehicle for governing their joint venture. This can be an alarming proposition for the consortium if the JSBA does not anticipate this possibility. 

The content of a JSBA is always a product of the time available prior to the submission of the licence application (which is usually 90 days from the launch of the licensing round in the case of the UKCS). The JSBA is typically drafted with a premature finish line in mind – the licence award. Instead, the parties should agree in the JSBA sufficient detail such that it can be used to operate the joint venture between the consortium members until when the JOA is agreed.

Consideration should be given to the inclusion in the JSBA of terms relating to each of the following:

  • the role of the operating committee;
  • grounds for removal of the operator;
  • the voting pass-mark;
  • the thresholds for approval of expenditure;
  • the consequences of default;
  • withdrawal and relinquishment;
  • non-consent and sole risk;
  • decommissioning; and
  • force majeure.

4. Exclusivity

It is common for the JSBA to prohibit the consortium parties from making a licence application outside the consortium in respect of the block which the consortium is considering under the JSBA. Consideration should also be given to prohibiting the parties from making an application for any other block in the licensing round unless it is made with the members of the consortium under the JSBA.

A situation may arise where a party to a number of consortia focuses more resources on its most preferred application resulting in its commitment to other applications being lessened. In the worst case, it may be that such a party has merely been 'tyre-kicking' various consortia and will only agree to progress that application which it most favours, resulting in that party attempting to withdraw from all but one application. Such a scenario leaves the consortium with a number of potential issues which can become troublesome if not properly managed in the terms of the JSBA, some of which are dealt with below in point 6.

Prospective applicants should be aware however that the exclusion of consortium parties from making other applications could present competition law problems, depending on how the exclusion is structured. Care therefore must be exercised when considering and drafting the exclusivity provisions in the JSBA.

5. Voting and Dissenting Parties

The JSBA should contain a voting mechanism for the making of decisions between the consortium members. It is important that the voting procedure is made bespoke such that it considers the key dates and milestones in the licensing round and it provides for decisions to be made sufficiently in advance of such key dates. 

Careful consideration must also be given to provisions to manage any dissenting parties. It is common for the JSBA to provide for a period in which a dissenting party can withdraw from the consortium before the licence application has been submitted if the terms of a proposed bid have been agreed by the other consortium members but do not appeal to the dissenting party. In the event of withdrawal from the consortium, the JSBA may make provision for the withdrawing party's interest to be allocated amongst the rest of the consortium members, or for the introduction of a third party to acquire that interest. 

Given that the technical and financial competence of a third party can be anywhere in the range of highly competent to unproven, the criteria for the introduction of a third party must be carefully considered in order to minimise the risk of dissatisfaction amongst the remaining consortium members in the event a third party joins the group. The JSBA should set out the criteria required in order to be eligible to enter the consortium and should deal with the process for approval of a third party by the remaining consortium members (including the requirement for unanimous approval). It is also recommended to make provision for the requirement for the effective novation of the JSBA to bring in a third party. This could be done by appending a deed of accession to the JSBA, and securing a power of attorney to act on behalf of the departing party.

6. Withdrawal

In some cases, the consortium members might not be able to reach unanimous agreement as to which block (or blocks) they wish to apply for jointly and on the terms of the intended licence application. In such an event, it is common for the JSBA to provide a process which results in a proposal being made, but where any parties not supportive of such proposal can elect not to participate. Where less than all the parties participate, the participating interests in the proposal will require recalculation and each participating party will normally be allocated a greater participating interest than that which it had originally contemplated at entry into the JSBA, save for where third parties are introduced to the application (see above) in place of the non-consenting parties so as to avoid the remaining parties increasing their respective stakes. The parties to the JSBA should recognise that it is possible that they may finish the bid process holding a greater participating interest than they originally did. A party wishing to avoid such a situation must pay careful attention to the recalculation formula and should negotiate the JSBA to protect against this.

The timing of the ability of a party to exercise a right of withdrawal is an important consideration. Where a party wishes to withdraw from the JSBA in the period prior to the closing date for the licence application, it is normally important to keep that party bound by the restrictions imposed upon it in relation to making other applications during the licensing round and in relation to confidentiality.

Caution must be exercised around the inclusion of withdrawal provisions in the JSBA. Some model agreements, such as the AIPN model form Study and Bid Agreement (2006), provide for a party to withdraw from the agreement with an obligation on the withdrawing party not to enter into a concession interest covering all or any part of the area which the consortium considered for a period of one year post-withdrawal. It would be preferable in most circumstances to extend this obligation to prohibit the withdrawing party from making any application in the relevant licensing round for the reasons mentioned in point 4 above.

7. Remedy for Default

The default provisions under the JSBA should operate such that if a member of the consortium defaults in the performance of the JSBA, that default does not jeopardise the intended licence application for the other members of the consortium. In most cases, the default provisions are not dissimilar in effect to those which are found in a standard JOA, but it is prudent to adjust these so that in the event of a default prior to closing of the licensing round, the defaulting party is obliged to remain a party to the JSBA, to support any application being made by the consortium, and to do all things required to support the award of the licence to the consortium, since it could be that the defaulting party is essential to the success of the consortium's application in the eyes of DECC. It is therefore sensible to draft the default provisions such that only after the licensing process will the defaulting party then forfeit its interest to the other consortium members. This will also be without prejudice to a claim for damages suffered in consequence of the acts or omissions of the defaulting party.

8. Many Blocks, Many Operators

A consortium could consider applying for multiple blocks. In such circumstances, the consortium could decide to appoint different operators to different blocks, based on considerations of location, expertise and economic efficiency. In this case, the JSBA draughtsman will have the challenge of crafting a JSBA which satisfactorily identifies that different operators are appointed to different blocks, with possibly different rules applying in respect of bidding for different blocks, with different operational terms applying until such times as the relevant JOAs are agreed, and applying different accounting procedures. This will not be an activity devoid of complexity.

9. Warranties and Indemnities

Warranties and indemnities are generally minimal in a JSBA. It is however desirable to include in the JSBA a warranty given by each consortium member that the acreage being considered by the consortium does not conflict with preexisting AMIAs or with any other contractual arrangements which that member has outside the consortium. This could be backed up by an indemnity in favour of the consortium members against claims made by third parties (who hold offended AMIA interests). 

A further desirable warranty relates to anti-bribery and corruption. Each party to the JSBA will warrant that it has not engaged in bribery in relation to the matters which are the subject of the JSBA. It is common to back this warranty up with an indemnity such that each other party is indemnified by a party which is in breach of the warranty. This could also be an event which necessitates consideration of a termination provision.

10. Agreeing the JOA at the Outset

Although not always possible due to the time constraints imposed by the licensing round timetable, it is preferable to agree the JOA at the time of the negotiation of the JSBA and to have the agreed form appended to the JSBA. Such an approach provides a degree of certainty about the purpose of the JSBA and allows the consortium members to fine tune the content of the JSBA and the JOA. It also allows the consortium members to better understand each other's contentions before a commitment is made to become a co-licensee. If such contentions arise at the outset, the consortium members have an opportunity to leave the consortium before any licence has been awarded. Exiting at this stage will be easier than trying to exit later as a licensee.


On analysis of the considerations above, it is evident that the importance of the content and purpose of the JSBA should not be underestimated. As is common in many situations that arise in the oil and gas industry which require contractual arrangements to be memorialised, model forms of JSBA are in existence which make a reasonable but incomplete attempt at engaging with the key issues, and in certain respects fail to deal with the nuances of the UKCS, with key desirable provisions missing. In order to underpin a successful joint application and the subsequent joint venture in the UKCS, there is no real substitute for a bespoke JSBA and timely advance preparation.


1 A model form JSBA is published by the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators and is available at www.aipn.org.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions