United States: Rule Review

New Grounds of Rejection at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Patent applicants are entitled to fair treatment by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), a federal law that governs how administrative agencies are permitted to take certain actions.  5 U.S.C. § 500 et seq.  When deciding a contested matter, such as the patentability of an applicant's patent claims, the APA requires that an applicant be provided with an opportunity to respond to a ground of rejection.  In other words, if the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or the Board) relies on a new ground of rejection denying patentability of an applicant's claims, that applicant has a right to argue against those new grounds.

Since the Supreme Court's decision in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007), patent applicants have been faced with steepening challenges arguing patentability.  The KSR decision permitted the USPTO to rely on "common sense" in formulating obviousness rejections, which can sometimes be vexing and difficult to overcome.  See id.  However, the PTAB may not overstep the requirement to treat applicants fairly by taking procedural shortcuts that deprive an applicant the right to respond fully to a rejection, on the record. 

Two recent decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit define when a ground of rejection by the PTAB is new.  It has long been the case that the Board can supplement the findings of a patent examiner.  The central question is whether the Board and the examiner properly relied on the same factual underpinnings and articulated reasoning in rejecting an applicant's claims or whether the Board made new findings and adopted different reasons to create a new ground of rejection under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77, thereby depriving the applicant of an opportunity to respond.

In Rambus v. Rea, 731 F.3d 1248 (Fed. Cir. 2013), the court considered a case where claims filed by Rambus directed to certain dynamic RAM memory operations were determined to be invalid on grounds of obviousness during reexamination.  The technology in question allowed memory write operations to take place during an entire microprocessor clock cycle, whereas in the prior art only half of the cycle was commonly used for writing to memory.  The examiner rejected the claims based on a certain combination of two references.  The examiner's rejection, however, was factually flawed, and all parties to the reexamination and appeal conceded that the rejection was in error.  The Board modified the examiner's reasoning that certain features of the primary reference could be replaced with teachings from a secondary reference by replacing it with a new finding that certain features of the primary reference could simply be dropped.  The Board justified its approach by stating that the rationale was obvious, and that Rambus had never shown that the application's claims were not obvious.  Rambus argued that this was a new ground of rejection and that it was not afforded the opportunity to fully respond.  Rambus also argued that the Board had improperly shifted the burden onto Rambus to prove patentability, rather than keeping the burden on the USPTO to show unpatentability.

The Federal Circuit, citing In re Leithem, 661 F.3d 1316, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2011), held that the Board may not rely on new facts and post-hoc rationale not previously raised to the applicant.  The court restated the existing law that the Board is not required "to recite and agree with the examiner's rejection in haec verba" and that the Board may elaborate on the examiner's findings, as long as the applicant had an adequate opportunity to respond during the USPTO proceeding.

By changing the specific finding of the examiner—that one skilled in the art would have been motivated to modify the primary reference in a certain way—the Board issued a new ground of rejection.  Because the findings were completely new, the Board was obliged to issue a new ground of rejection under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b).

In In re Biedermann, the court considered claims directed to an orthopedic bone screw having a holding portion that connects to other bone screws.  733 F.3d 329 (Fed. Cir. 2013).  The holding portion has an inner thread that cooperates with the outer thread of a locking element to hold screws securely together. The configuration of the screw threads was at issue in this case.  In the prior art, the threads on the holding portion of the primary reference were of a certain "saw-tooth" configuration.  In contrast, the claimed apparatus used square threads.

During examination, the examiner rejected the claims for obviousness.  The examiner reasoned that one of ordinary skill in the art would have substituted square threads, as taught by a secondary reference, for the "saw-tooth" threads in the bone screw of the primary reference in order to provide "for efficient load transfer."  The secondary reference applied by the examiner was based on machine parts used to transfer heavy loads, and taught that square threads were desirable because of their large cross-section.

The Board modified the examiner's rejection to state that the substitution of threadforms could be made based on an additional reference (the Machinery's Handbook), which stated that the "saw-tooth" threadform of the primary reference was a type of "buttress" thread that could be used for load translation.  Because both square threads and buttress threads can be used for load translation, the Board concluded they would have been interchangeable to one of ordinary skill in the art.  Specifically, the Board pointed to the elimination of the radial component of a load when screwing components together.

The Federal Circuit refused the Board's substitution of the rationale for combining the teachings.  The substitution of "interchangeability" for the examiner's "load transfer efficiency" constituted a new ground of rejection because the rationale for combining the prior art references had been modified.  The court also found that the Board had ignored evidence in the primary reference stating that square threads (used in the claimed invention) were in fact difficult to cut, undercutting the Board's argument of interchangeability of the threadforms.

The reminder for patent prosecutors is that the procedural requirements imposed on the USPTO are designed to ensure fair treatment of patent applicants.  If at any time during the prosecution of a patent application, an applicant is confronted with a prematurely final rejection, the applicant should object in a timely manner.  Applicants almost always have an opportunity to call an examiner's attention to their right to respond to any grounds of rejection.  Although the cases discussed here pertain to actions before the PTAB, analogous arguments could be made during prosecution.  See 37 C.F.R. § 1.113; M.P.E.P. § 706.07 et seq.

A new ground of rejection is likely to be accompanied by the citation of a new reference, which should be treated as a yellow flag.  As held by the Federal Circuit's predecessor court, the citation and reliance on a new reference to support a rejection will usually be an indication of a new ground of rejection.  In re Biedermann, 733 F.3d at 338 (quoting In re Boon, 439 F.2d 724, 727-28 (CCPA 1971)).  There are possible exceptions, such as when the reference is a standard work, cited only to support a fact that was previously judicially noticed or plays a minor role, such as filling in any gaps which might exist in the evidentiary showing made by the examiner to support a particular ground for rejection.  But the recent teaching of the Federal Circuit makes it clear that the Board errs when it relies on new grounds of rejection.

This article previously appeared in Full Disclosure Patent Prosecution Update, January 2014.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
27 Nov 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Finnegan partner Anthony Tridico will present “U.S. Patent Case Law Update” at the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys’ annual Patent Case Law Review.

28 Nov 2017, Seminar, Milan, Italy

Finnegan partner John Paul will present “Internet of Things: Patent Liability, Enforcement and Licensing” and will join the Mock WIPO Mediation at International Technology Transfer—Licensing and ADR, co-hosted by Licensing Executives Society and World Intellectual Property Organization.

29 Nov 2017, Seminar, Tel Aviv, Israel

Finnegan is a platinum sponsor IVC Research Center’s start-up forum, “The Most Promising Start Ups for 2017 – A Synergy of Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Vision and IoT.”

 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Emails

From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.