United States: Corporate And Financial Weekly Digest - Volume IX, Issue 2

Last Updated: January 15 2014

Edited by Robert Weiss and Gregory Xethalis

SEC / CORPORATE

Judges Raise Concerns Regarding Conflict Minerals Rule at Appeal Hearing

On January 7, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held oral arguments for the lawsuit challenging the Securities and Exchange Commission's conflict minerals rule. According to reports on the hearing, two of the three judges on the panel, David Sentelle and A. Raymond Randolph, expressed concerns regarding the rule. These two judges were reportedly sympathetic to arguments raised by attorneys for the trade groups challenging the conflict minerals rule that the rule went beyond the intent of Congress and forced companies to speak against their will in violation of the First Amendment.

The appellate court did not provide any guidance regarding when they might rule on the case, and unless the rule is vacated, issuers will still be required to comply with the conflict minerals rule for the calendar year beginning January 1, 2013 (regardless of the issuer's fiscal year), with any initial Form SD required to be filed with the SEC no later than May 31, 2014. For additional information, please see the CorporateandFinancialWeeklyDigest edition ofAugust 24, 2012  regarding the release of the conflict minerals rule and the edition of July 26, 2013 discussing the initial ruling in the case challenging the rule.

SEC Division of Corporation Finance Issues Five Additional C&DIs Relating to "Bad Actor" Rule

On January 3, the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Corporation Finance issued five new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) with respect to Rule 506 under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act). These C&DIs relate to the rule (Rule 506(d)) recently adopted by the SEC (Bad Actor Rule) that disqualifies issuers from relying on Rule 506 of Regulation D for securities offerings involving certain felons and other so-called "bad actors" (the persons subject to the Bad Actor Rule being referred to as covered persons). These are in addition to the C&DIs relating to the Bad Actor Rule released on December 4, 2013, as discussed in the Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest edition of December 6, 2013. The new C&DIs include the following interpretative guidance:

C&DI 260.28 provides that a shareholder that becomes a 20% beneficial owner by purchasing securities in an offering is not a "covered person" subject to the Bad Actor Rule with respect to such offering (as that shareholder was not a covered person at the time of the sale). It would, however, be a covered person with respect to any sales of securities in the same offering made after it became a 20% beneficial owner.

C&DI 260.29 and  C&DI 260.30 clarify that that the term "beneficial owner" under Rule 506(d) is interpreted the same way as under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rule 13d-3 (i.e., any person who, directly or indirectly (which includes "looking through" entities to their controlling persons), has or shares: (1) the power to vote and/or (2) the power to dispose of, a security).

C&DI 260.31 clarifies that the analysis for determining beneficial ownership under Rule 506(d) (and, consequently, whether a party or group of parties constitutes a 20% beneficial owner of the issuer and is therefore a "covered person") is conducted the same as it is for purposes of Exchange Act Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5(b). By way of example,  C&DI 260.31 provides that shareholders that have entered into a voting agreement under which each shareholder agrees to vote its shares in favor of director candidates designated by another party have formed a

[image]group, and the group beneficially owns the shares beneficially owned by its members. Shareholders party to a voting agreement that have the power to vote shares beneficially owned by others party to the voting agreement (e.g., through an irrevocable proxy or the right to designate director nominees) are deemed to beneficially own such shares. Shareholders that do not have the power to vote other parties' shares would not be deemed beneficial owners of such shares solely as a result of entering into the voting agreement.

C&DI 260.31 provides that if a group, such as the group formed by entering into the voting agreement, is a 20% beneficial owner, then disqualification under Rule 506(d) would arise from triggering events involving the group itself. If a party to the voting agreement becomes a 20% beneficial owner (i.e., a covered person) as a result of shares of other parties being added to such covered person's beneficial ownership, disqualification would arise from triggering events involving that covered person.

C&DI 260.32 provides that an order issued by a court or a regulatory authority pursuant to Rule 506(d)(2)(iii), advising the SEC that Rule 506 disqualification should not occur as a consequence of such order, does not waive the disclosure obligations set forth in Rule 506(e), which requires investors to disclose events that would have triggered disqualification under the Bad Actor Rule but for the fact they occurred before September 23, 2013. Rule 506(d)(2)(iii) permits issuers to rely on the self-executing statement of a regulatory authority to avoid Rule 506 disqualification when that regulatory authority advises the SEC in a writing that Rule 506 disqualification should not arise as a consequence of a disqualifying event occurring on or after September 23, 2013.  C&DI 260.32 further clarifies that a regulatory authority may, however, determine that an order entered before September 23, 2013 would not have triggered disqualification under Rule 506(d)(1) because the violation was not a final order based on a violation of any law or regulation prohibiting fraudulent, manipulative or deceptive conduct entered within 10 years before such sale.

CFTC

CFTC Requests Comment on Staff Advisory Regarding the Applicability of Transaction Level Requirements

On January 3, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission requested public comment on the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight's Advisory regarding the applicability of transaction-level requirements to non- US swap dealers. The advisory, which was issued on November 14, stated that a non-US swap dealer entering into a swap with a non-US counterparty would nonetheless need to comply with the transaction-level requirements set forth in the CFTC's Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement Regarding Compliance with Certain Swap Regulations if the non-US swap dealer regularly used personnel or agents located in the United States to arrange, negotiate or execute the swap.

Comments are due on March 10, 2014.

The request for comment is available here.

CFTC Staff Extends No – Action Relief for Transaction – Level Requirements in Certain Cross-Borde Situations

In an action parallel with the request for public comment (see "CFTC Requests Comment on Staff Advisory Regarding the Applicability of Transaction Level Requirements," above), on January 3, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO) issued a no-action letter extending the relief provided by CFTC Letter No. 13-71. Pursuant to this relief, DSIO will not recommend enforcement action against a non-US swap dealer that uses personnel or agents located in the United States to arrange, negotiate or execute certain swaps with non-US persons for failing to comply with the transaction-level requirements, provided the non-US persons are not guaranteed affiliates or conduit affiliates of a US person. This relief will now be available until September 15, 2014.

CFTC No-Action Letter 14-01 is available here.

[image]NFAImplementsAdditionalReportingRequirementsforCertainFCMs

On January 6, National Futures Association (NFA) issued a notice to members implementing new daily, monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for futures commission merchants (FCMs) for which NFA is the designated self-regulatory organization. Pursuant to the new reporting requirements, FCMs must report certain information related to margin deficiencies, customer and non-customer accounts, counterparties, fees, funding, lines of credit, customer trading activity, outside business activities, new products or services, lawsuits, disciplinary actions, highest-performing associated persons and stress tests. The first daily, monthly and quarterly reports are due January 14, February 3 and April 1, respectively.

More information is available here .

LITIGATION

Arthro Care to Pay $30 Million Fine to Settle DOJ Probe

On January 7, Texas-based surgical instrument maker ArthroCare Corp. entered into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) to resolve a six-year-long US Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation into allegations of a $400 million securities fraud scheme.

In conjunction with the DPA, the DOJ concurrently filed a criminal information containing a single conspiracy count to commit wire and securities fraud. Pursuant to the DPA, which runs for two years, ArthroCare agreed to pay a $30 million fine and to maintain an "enhanced" compliance program under which it must report annually to the DOJ.

Under the deferred prosecution agreement, ArthroCare admitted that several former senior executives inflated ArthroCare's revenue by tens of millions of dollars by shipping extra products to its distributors at the end of financial quarters, even though the shipments were not for actual orders, so that ArthroCare could count the shipments as sales and meet earnings forecasts. In return, ArthroCare's distributors were given substantial cash commissions, extended payment terms or the ability to return product after the end of the quarter.

Former executives John Raffle and David Applegate have pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud, while ArthroCare CEO Michael Baker and former ArthroCare finance chief Michael Gluk are scheduled to go to trial in May.

Alcoa Subsidiary Pleads Guilty to FCPA Charge, Will Pay $348 Million

On January 9, Alcoa World Alumina LLC, a majority-owned and controlled global alumina sales company of Alcoa Inc., agreed to plead guilty and to pay $223 million in criminal fines and forfeitures to resolve charges that it paid millions of dollars in bribes through an international middleman in London to officials of the Kingdom of Bahrain, in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). According to the acting head of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, Mythili Raman, the company admitted to "involvement in a corrupt international underworld in which a middleman, secretly held offshore bank accounts, and shell companies were used to funnel bribes to government officials to secure business."

Alcoa agreed to plead guilty to one count of violating the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA in connection with a 2004 corrupt transaction, to pay a criminal fine of $209 million and to administratively forfeit $14 million. As part of the plea agreement, Alcoa Inc. must also implement and maintain an anti-corruption compliance program. Alcoa concurrently settled civil charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an administrative proceeding related to the anti-bribery, internal controls, and books and records provisions of the FCPA, and will pay an additional $161 million in disgorgement.

This case marks the fourth-largest overall FCPA settlement with the federal government behind Siemens ($800 million on December 15, 2008), KBR & Halliburton ($579 million on February 11, 2009) and Total S.A. ($398.2 million on May 29, 2013).

[image] BANKING

Lawmakers Introduce Legislation to Resolve CDO - TruPSControversy

In the latest installment of the Volcker Rule's collateralized debt obligation-trust preferred securities (CDO-TruPS) controversy, on January 8, two House Financial Service Committee members introduced a bill to exempt existing CDOs backed by so-called TruPS from the Volcker Rule. The Volcker Rule provision reportedly would cause banks holding CDO-TruPS to divest them by July 15, 2015, and would additionally cause such institutions to have to mark them to market for the quarter ended December 31, 2013 and thereafter, causing unanticipated losses for many community banks.

The bill, H.R. 3819, entitled the Fairness for Community Job Creators Act, specifically states: "Nothing in this section [of the Dodd-Frank Act] shall be construed to require the divestiture of any 8 collateralized debt obligations issued before December 10, 2013 that as of December 10, 2013 are predominantly backed by trust preferred securities.'' In statements accompanying the bill, the bill's sponsors—Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) and Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit Subcommittee Chairperson Shelley Moore Capito (R-West Virginia)—made the following statements, respectively:

For more than three years, those who support the Dodd-Frank Act assured community banks they would not be harmed by the Volcker regulations. Then, in the dark of night, suddenly Washington regulators at the last minute changed the rules and included these products in the Volcker regulations with no time for public comment or review. That's unfair and it will do nothing but undermine the ability of small businesses that create jobs and other bank customers to receive loans from their financial institutions.

This targeted legislation prevents community banks from being forced to take considerable losses on investments they intend to hold to maturity. Avoiding these arbitrary losses will allow local financial institutions to continue to recover and help nurture the small businesses in their communities.

The agencies that issued the rule—the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Agencies)—are expected to revisit the CDO-TruPS issue on or before January 15 in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Bankers Association and several small banks.

Depending on what the Agencies do, the bill that was introduced may become moot.

The bill is available here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions