United States: Fourth Circuit Addresses Protections For US IP Licenses In Case Under Chapter 15 Of The Bankruptcy Code

Last Updated: December 13 2013
Article by Brian Trust and Joel Moss

Keywords: US IP Licenses, Chapter 15, Bankruptcy Code, insolvency

In a case of significant importance to licensees of US intellectual property, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held in Jaffé v. Samsung Electronics Co. (In re Qimonda), Case No. 12-1802, 2003 WL 26478864 (4th Cir. Dec. 3, 2013) ("Jaffé"), that a bankruptcy court did not err by requiring that the protections of section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code apply with respect to a foreign debtor's US intellectual property ("IP") as a condition of granting the debtor's foreign representative relief under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code. This decision affirms that the significant protections for IP licensees pursuant to section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code can apply in an ancillary chapter 15 case to US IP even where licensees would receive no similar protections in the debtor's home country insolvency proceeding.

Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code provides licensees of "intellectual property" the opportunity to preserve their rights under their IP licenses, notwithstanding the debtor's general ability to reject executory contracts in bankruptcy (which may include IP licenses). Not all foreign jurisdictions, however, have constructed a statutory framework to protect the rights of an IP licensee in a licensor's insolvency, and such jurisdictions may even enable the licensor to terminate a license of IP in insolvency.

The Jaffé court directly confronted the question of the extent to which the laws of the United States protect the interests of IP licensees in cross-border insolvency proceedings, such as those under chapter 15 of the US Bankruptcy Code, when the laws of the home country insolvency proceeding allow for termination of US licenses upon insolvency. Notwithstanding chapter 15's strong policies in favor of cooperation and coordination with foreign insolvency proceedings, the Jaffé court ruled that US policy of protecting IP licensees pursuant to section 365(n) was important enough to require application of section 365(n) with respect to US IP in an ancillary proceeding under chapter 15 even though the home country's insolvency laws would not provide licensees similar protections. While the Jaffé court's decision is no doubt significant, it remains to be seen whether other courts will afford IP licensees similar protections in other chapter 15 proceedings.

Section 365(n)

The ability to reject burdensome executory contracts under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code is one of the strongest tools afforded to a debtor in a US bankruptcy proceeding. In general, a contract is executory when, as of the petition date, each of the counterparties has unperformed obligations, the nonperformance of which would be a material breach. Under the Bankruptcy Code, rejection generally constitutes a breach of the debtor's obligations as of the petition date, giving rise to a prepetition damage claim.

When the debtor is a licensor of IP, there is a tension between the rejection power and the licensee's right to continued use of the IP. Prior to the enactment of section 365(n), the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit resolved such tension soundly in favor of the debtor-licensor in Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc.,1 where the court permitted the rejection of an IP license by a debtor-licensor, thereby depriving the licensee of continued use of the IP.

To correct the perceived inequity of the Lubrizol decision, Congress promptly enacted section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. Pursuant to section 365(n), if a debtor-licensor rejects a license for "intellectual property" (as such term is defined in section 101(35)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code), the licensee may elect either (i) to treat the license as terminated if the breach caused by the rejection would allow the licensee to do so by the terms of the license, by applicable non-bankruptcy law, or by an agreement made by the licensee with another entity or (ii) to retain, as a general matter, its rights under the license and any agreement supplementary to the license (including any exclusivity provision) and to continue to use the licensed IP (as such rights existed immediately before the filing of the bankruptcy case) as provided by the license for the term of the license and any term for which the license may be extended.

Chapter 15

Chapter 15 largely incorporates the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency promulgated by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. It was enacted to facilitate cooperation and coordination with foreign proceedings, to facilitate fair and efficient administration of cross-border insolvencies and to protect and maximize a foreign debtor's US-based assets.

Under chapter 15, a foreign representative of the foreign debtor files a petition for recognition by the US bankruptcy court of a foreign insolvency proceeding as either a "foreign main proceeding" or a "foreign nonmain proceeding." Recognition of a foreign insolvency proceeding as a "foreign main proceeding" affords a foreign representative certain automatic relief, including application of the "automatic stay" of section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code to the debtor and property of the debtor within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States and the ability to operate the debtor's business within the United States under section 363. Application of section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, including the provisions of section 365(n), is not mandatory upon recognition of a foreign proceeding as a foreign main proceeding.

In addition to the automatic relief that comes with the entry of an order granting recognition of a foreign proceeding as a foreign main proceeding, section 1521 of the Bankruptcy Code authorizes the bankruptcy court to grant discretionary relief. Section 1521 provides that "where necessary to effectuate the purpose of this chapter and to protect the assets of the debtor or the interests of the creditors, the court may, at the request of the foreign representative, grant any appropriate relief." 11 U.S.C. § 1521(a). This discretionary relief may include entrusting the administration, realization and distribution of all or part of the debtor's assets within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States to the foreign representative. Id. § 1521(a)(5), (b).

The framework reflects the full commitment of the United States to cooperate with foreign insolvency proceedings in support of, among other things, greater legal certainty for trade and investment.

But the ability of a foreign representative to administer a foreign debtor's US assets in furtherance of a harmonized cross-border insolvency is not unbridled. The US bankruptcy court may grant discretionary relief under section 1521 only if it determines that "the interests of the creditors and other interested entities, including the debtor, are sufficiently protected." Id. § 1522(a). The bankruptcy court may also subject the discretionary relief it grants under section 1521 "to conditions it considers appropriate." Id. § 1522(b). Further, pursuant to section 1506 of the Bankruptcy Code, the bankruptcy court may deny a foreign representative relief to which it is otherwise entitled under chapter 15 if such relief is "manifestly contrary to the public policy of the United States" (i.e., the "public policy exception").

Qimonda

The licensor-licensee tension arose again in Jaffé, where a US bankruptcy court decided whether application of the protections of section 365(n) in respect of US IP being administered by a foreign representative was necessary to sufficiently protect the interests of licensees whose licenses would otherwise be terminated under the applicable laws of the foreign main proceeding.

In Jaffé, the debtor ("Qimonda") was a German corporation that manufactured semiconductor devices. When Qimonda filed for insolvency in Germany in January 2009, the principal assets of its estate consisted of some 10,000 patents, about 4,000 of which were US patents. The patents were subject to cross-license agreements with Qimonda's competitors, as was consistent with industry practice to avoid infringement risks caused by the "patent thicket"—i.e., the overlapping patent rights of some 420,000 patents in the semiconductor industry.

Qimonda's foreign representative, Dr. Michael Jaffé, filed a petition under chapter 15 of the US Bankruptcy Code for recognition of the German insolvency proceeding as a "foreign main proceeding." The foreign representative also requested certain discretionary relief— specifically, that the bankruptcy court entrust to him the administration of all of Qimonda's assets within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, largely consisting of the 4,000 US patents.

The bankruptcy court granted the petition and recognized the German proceeding as Qimonda's foreign main proceeding. The bankruptcy court also granted discretionary relief under section 1521. The bankruptcy court, however, conditioned such relief on making section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code applicable to Qimonda's US patents.

Because Qimonda was in the process of liquidation, the foreign representative's objective was to replace the existing cross-licenses paid in-kind (i.e., paid with other cross-licenses) for new licenses paid in cash through royalties. Applicable German law, it was assumed, authorized termination of the licensees' rights to use Qimonda's IP and provided no protection to such licensees akin to section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. The foreign representative sought to declare Qimonda's existing licenses unenforceable and to re-license Qimonda's IP for the benefit of Qimonda's creditors.

The licensees objected to the foreign representative's efforts and sought to invoke their rights under section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. They argued that a balancing of the interests under section 1522(a) of the Bankruptcy Code weighed in favor of the licensees, and, separately, that applying German law to terminate US IP licenses would be manifestly contrary to US public policy. After an initial ruling, appeal to the district court, and four-day evidentiary hearing on remand, the bankruptcy court ultimately ruled in favor of the licensees, concluding that a balancing of Qimonda's and the licensees' interests weighed in favor of making section 365(n) applicable to the administration of Qimonda's US IP and that applying German law to cancel the US licenses would bemanifestly contrary to US public policy.

On appeal to the Fourth Circuit, the foreign representative made three principal arguments: (i) the lower courts erred in even considering section 1522(a) because that section applies only to relief granted under section 1521 "at the request of the foreign representative," and Jaffé, as the foreign representative, never requested the inclusion of section 365(n) as part of the discretionary relief; (ii) the bankruptcy court incorrectly applied a balancing test that did not place all creditors on an equal footing; and (iii) in balancing the competing interests, the bankruptcy court overstated the risks to the licensees.

The Fourth Circuit described the foreign representative's first argument as "too myopic." It did not matter, the court reasoned, that the foreign representative had not specifically requested application of section 365(n) as part of the overall relief he was seeking from the US bankruptcy court. The foreign representative had requested discretionary relief under section 1521 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Fourth Circuit reasoned that the bankruptcy court may grant such discretionary relief "only if the interests of the creditors and other interested entities, including the debtor, are sufficiently protected," 11 U.S.C. § 1522(a),2 and, accordingly, the bankruptcy court was required to determine whether the interests of creditors and others were sufficiently protected pursuant to section 1522(a).

The foreign representative also argued that the bankruptcy court applied section 1522(a) of the Bankruptcy Code incorrectly in determining that the protections of section 365(n) were required for Qimonda's US patents. The foreign representative argued that the bankruptcy court erred by applying a test that could place creditors on unequal footing and that would yield a result in tension with German law, the law of the foreign main proceeding. Drawing support from legislative history, however, the Fourth Circuit held that the analysis required under section 1522(a) of the Bankruptcy Code is "best done by balancing the respective interests based on the relative harms and benefits in light of the circumstances presented"—i.e., a balancing test.

The foreign representative further argued that the bankruptcy court simply reached an incorrect result, even if the court applied an appropriate balancing test. The foreign representative argued that the bankruptcy court overstated the harm to the licensees, especially in light of the foreign representative's offer to relicense the US IP to the licensees on relatively reasonable terms. The bankruptcy court, however, concluded that if section 365(n) were not made applicable to the US IP in Qimonda's chapter 15 case, the licensees would face the immediate threat of a hold-up and infringement litigation, and that a general destabilization of the licensing regime in the industry could result. The bankruptcy court also found that the foreign representative's offer could not sufficiently protect the licensees' interests from, among other things, subsequent owners of the US IP and the uncertainty attendant therewith. The Fourth Circuit ultimately concluded that the bankruptcy court's analysis was "comprehensive and eminently reasonable."

Concluding Thoughts

Because the Fourth Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court's determination that, upon a balancing of the harms under section 1522(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, application of section 365(n) was necessary to provide licensees with sufficient protection in connection with the foreign representative's administration of US IP, the Fourth Circuit did not reach whether application of section 365(n) was mandated by the public policy exception in section 1506 of the Bankruptcy Code. Nor did the Fpourth Circuit make any sweeping pronouncements that application of section 365(n) is mandated in all chapter 15 proceedings where IP is a significant asset of the foreign debtor. Moreover, the application of section 1522(a) of the Bankruptcy Code is a question of fact generally left to the lower court's discretion on appeal. For these reasons, the Jaffé decision may be limited to its facts and thus have limited precedential value.

Under different facts and circumstances, a bankruptcy court might determine that a balancing of the harms under section 1522(a) weighs in favor of the foreign representative. Or a foreign representative simply might refrain from requesting discretionary relief under section 1521 and bypass the section 1522(a) balancing test altogether where US IP is a significant asset of the foreign debtor.

Under those circumstances, however, licensees may argue that application of section 365(n) is necessary to prevent a result that is manifestly contrary to the public policy of the United States. In this regard, the Fourth Circuit strongly suggested, without holding, that the licensees have the better argument: "by affirming the bankruptcy court's application of § 365(n) following its balancing analysis under § 1522(a), we also indirectly further the public policy that underlies § 365(n)" in that "licensees have a strong interest in maintaining their right to use intellectual property following the licensor's bankruptcy" and that denial of "that right would impose a burden on American technological development that was never intended by Congress."

Originally published December 11, 2013

Footnotes

1 Lubrizol Enters., Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc. (In re Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc.), 756 F.2d 1043 (4th Cir. 1985) ("Lubrizol").

2 The bankruptcy court also has the authority to "subject" any discretionary relief "to conditions it considers appropriate." 11 U.S.C. § 1522(b).

Learn more about our Restructuring, Bankruptcy & Insolvency practice.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2013. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions