United States: Neither The Mandate Rule Nor Collateral Estoppel Bars A Second Appeal On Claim Constructions Not Necessarily Decided By An Earlier Rule 36 Decision

Article by Adam S. Boger*

In TecSec, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp., No. 12-1415 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 2, 2013), the Federal Circuit held that TecSec, Inc.'s ("TecSec") appeal of the district court's claim construction was not barred under either the mandate rule or the doctrine of collateral estoppel by the Court's earlier summary affirmance under Federal Circuit Rule 36 ("Rule 36") in a prior appeal. The Court then affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, and remanded the district court's SJ decision of noninfringement after concluding that the district court had incorrectly construed various claim terms.

TecSec owns U.S. Patent Nos. 5,369,702 ("the '702 patent"); 5,680,452 ("the '452 patent"); and 5,898,781 ("the '781 patent"), all directed to methods and systems for securing computer data by nesting encrypted objects into other objects, which are also encrypted. Representative claim 8 of the '702 patent recites in relevant part: "A system for providing multi-level multimedia security in a data network comprising . . . digital logic means, the digital logic means comprising . . . a system memory means for storing data . . . ." Slip op. at 3 (citation omitted).

TecSec sued International Business Machines Corp. ("IBM") and several other companies, alleging infringement by Internet servers and related software products. Early in the case, the district court severed TecSec's claims against IBM and stayed proceedings against the other defendants. The district court then granted IBM's motion for SJ of noninfringement, concluding that TecSec had failed to produce any evidence of any act of infringement by IBM or its customers. The district court also construed the claims and separately concluded that TecSec had failed as a matter of law to show that IBM's software met every limitation of the claims as construed. On its first appeal, TecSec challenged both the district court's claim construction and its conclusion that TecSec had failed to prove infringement by IBM. The Federal Circuit affirmed the decision without opinion pursuant to Rule 36. On remand, TecSec stipulated to noninfringement by the other defendants under the claim construction adopted by the district court during the proceedings against IBM, and the district court entered SJ of noninfringement. TecSec again appealed the district court's claim construction.

In the present appeal, the Federal Circuit held that neither the mandate rule nor the doctrine of collateral estoppel barred TecSec from rearguing claim construction. Addressing the mandate rule, the Court reasoned that because the district court's earlier-appealed judgment was based on two independent grounds—a failure of proof on infringement and a failure to show that IBM's software met the various claim limitations as construed—and because the Rule 36 decision did not articulate a basis for affirmance, "it cannot be concluded simply on the basis of this court's summary affirmance that we expressly or by necessary implication decided the claim construction issues in the IBM appeal." Id. at 10. Based on the same reasoning, the Court also concluded that claim construction was neither actually determined by nor critical and necessary to its Rule 36 affirmance, and thus the Court held that collateral estoppel also did not apply to this case.

"Had claim construction been the only issue in the IBM appeal, and had that claim construction been essential to sustaining the judgment of noninfringement, the preclusive effect of our Rule 36 judgment would have been undeniable. But that was not the case." Slip op. at 11.

The Federal Circuit then turned to the disputed claim constructions. The Court first construed "multi-level multimedia security" as requiring "multiple layers of encryption." Id. at 16. The Court rejected TecSec's argument that "security" is broader than "encryption" and thus encompasses access control, finding that the inventor had defined "multi-level multimedia security" during prosecution to require multiple layers of encryption. Specifically, in responding to a rejection that "multi-level multimedia security" was unclear, the inventor had amended the specification and explained that the invention achieves multi-level multimedia security in two ways, both of which require multiple layers of encryption. The Court also rejected TecSec's claim differentiation argument for a broader interpretation of "security," explaining that "[c]laim differentiation is not a rigid rule and it cannot overcome a construction required by the prosecution history." Id. (citing Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Dakocytomation Cal., Inc., 517 F.3d 1364, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2008)).

The Federal Circuit then held that "multimedia security" broadly relates to the type of security employed and was not limited during prosecution to the type of data secured, i.e., multimedia data. Specifically, the Court rejected the defendants' argument that the inventor had defined the term during prosecution by referring to a dictionary definition of "multimedia." According to the Court, the inventor cited the dictionary solely for the proposition that "multimedia" was well known in the art; he did not argue that the definition of "multimedia security" required encryption of multimedia objects, nor did he characterize his claims as limited to encryption of multimedia objects, or distinguish his invention from the prior art on that basis. The Court thus concluded, "In these circumstances, we cannot say that the inventor clearly and unmistakably limited his claims to encrypting multimedia objects." Id. at 18.

The Federal Circuit also addressed sixteen disputed claim limitations employing the term "means." The Court first held that the terms "system memory means" for storing data and "digital logic means" were not means-plus-function limitations under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. The Court explained that, to one of skill in the art, a "system memory" is a specific structure for storing data, and thus overcame the presumption that the use of the term "means" triggered § 112, ¶ 6. The Court distinguished Chicago Board Options Exchange v. International Securities Exchange, 677 F.3d 1361, 1367 n.1 (Fed. Cir. 2012), explaining that, in that case, not only had the Court held that the patentee had waived its right to argue that "system memory" recited sufficient structure to avoid § 112, ¶ 6, but also noted that the "system memory means" in that case recited a more specific function than simply storing data. Next, the Court held that "digital logic means" designates to skilled artisans the structure of digital circuits that perform Boolean algebra, and the claims, which did not recite a function for the digital logic means to perform, did recite sufficient structural elements, including a system memory and specific modules and subsystems, so as to not implicate § 112, ¶ 6.

Finally, the Federal Circuit held that the specification discloses sufficient corresponding structure for the fourteen disputed computer-implemented means-plus-function limitations to avoid indefiniteness. The Court rejected the defendants' contentions that the specification discloses only generic software, finding instead that the specification discloses three examples of specific products with detailed prose that show how those products operate to implement the claimed functions. In light of its claim construction, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's SJ of noninfringement as to one defendant, reversed as to the remaining defendants, and remanded for further proceedings.

Judge Reyna dissented. Judge Reyna would have held that TecSec was barred under both the mandate rule and the doctrine of collateral estoppel from relitigating the district court's claim construction. According to Judge Reyna, claim construction and the sufficiency of the evidence showing an act of infringement are not alternative grounds for finding noninfringement, but rather are part of a singular analysis. Judge Reyna concluded that "[t]he majority's disposition in this case allow[ed] TecSec two bites at the claim construction apple," undermining both the confidence in and the utility of Rule 36. Reyna Dissent at 10.

Judges: Moore, Linn (author), Reyna (dissenting)

[Appealed from E.D. Va., Judge Brinkema]

*Adam S. Boger is a Law Clerk at Finnegan.

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, November 2013.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Nov 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Finnegan partner Anthony Tridico will present “U.S. Patent Case Law Update” at the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys’ annual Patent Case Law Review.

28 Nov 2017, Seminar, Milan, Italy

Finnegan partner John Paul will present “Internet of Things: Patent Liability, Enforcement and Licensing” and will join the Mock WIPO Mediation at International Technology Transfer—Licensing and ADR, co-hosted by Licensing Executives Society and World Intellectual Property Organization.

29 Nov 2017, Seminar, Tel Aviv, Israel

Finnegan is a platinum sponsor IVC Research Center’s start-up forum, “The Most Promising Start Ups for 2017 – A Synergy of Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Vision and IoT.”

 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Emails

From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.