United States: Public Class Actions In Italy

Last Updated: November 25 2013
Article by Lamberto Schiona and Margherita Magillo

Most Read Contributor in United States, September 2019

In May, Jones Day published a Commentary discussing recent developments related to class actions in Italy. It primarily focused on the so-called "compensatory" class action ("azione di classe risarcitoria") provided for by Art. 140bis of the Italian Consumer Code (Legislative Decree n. 206/2005 and subsequent amendments). This type of class action enables groups of consumers or users and any of their relevant associations to seek compensation of damages arising from violation of their rights in the context of their relationship with business entities.

Italian law also provides for another type of class action: the so-called "public" class action, introduced by Legislative Decree n. 198/2009, which may be brought by a group of consumers and users and/or their representative associations in order to seek protection against the wrongdoings of the Italian Public Administration, including government entities or other public or private bodies providing public service. Such wrongdoings could include, for example, breaches of the rights of a plurality of individuals deriving from violations of quality and economic standards of the service rendered, any violation of terms, or failure to issue an administrative act.

Public class actions were established by Law 4 March 2009, n. 15 (a.k.a. "Legge Brunetta," named after the relevant Minister of Public Administration and Innovation). This law is aimed at, inter alia, boosting productivity in public employment as well as efficiency and transparency in the Italian Public Administration.

In this Commentary, we will first touch upon the main characteristics of the civil "compensatory" class action and then compare them with the "public" class action, which is the focus of this article.

"Compensatory" Class Actions in the Context of Unfair Commercial Practices

The type of class action set forth in the Italian Consumer Code may be brought by consumers, users, and relevant associations before Italian civil courts and is aimed at obtaining a declaration of the defendant's liability, as well as compensation of damages, in violations of the following specific rights, as provided for by Art. 140bis,par. 2, of the Italian Consumer Code:  

  • Contractual rights arising out of standard contractual terms and conditions binding the plaintiffs and a business entity;
  • Rights in respect of defects of products or services, regardless of any contractual relationship between the plaintiffs and the manufacturer of such product/service; and
  • Rights to compensation accorded to consumers or users for unfair commercial practices or anticompetitive conducts.

Compensatory class actions are therefore mainly filed against business entities, such as individuals, corporations, or other legal entities acting within the scope of their business. In addition, they may be brought against "providers of public services" ("gestori di servizi  pubblici o di pubblica utilità ", Art. 140bis, para. 12), which may be public entities or, alternatively, private companies providing a public service. This type of class action concerns the violation of rights of a group of consumers/users in contractual and commercial matters; it may not be brought in the context of the relationship between consumers/users or citizens and Public Administrations.

"Public" Class Actions Against the Inefficiencies ofGovernmental Entities and Other Public Bodies

The public class action, introduced by Leg. Decree n. 198/2009, is more closely connected to public action or, more precisely, to the action of Public Administrations, such as government entities, public bodies, and providers of public services, and it is intended to stimulate and improve the quality of such entities' actions.

Also known as "collective action for the effectiveness of the action of government entities and the providers of public services," a public class action may be brought by the holders of relevant identical interests, such as citizens, consumers, or users or any association representing their interests, in cases in which such interests are violated by the Public Administration.

Public class actions are aimed at protecting the right holders against violations of quality standards of public services, regardless of the public or private nature of the entities providing such services. Indeed, the public class action tool is an expression of the principle contained in Art. 97 of the Italian Constitution, according to which "quality performance" and "impartiality" of the Public Administration shall always be guaranteed.

In particular, public class actions are directed to "restore the correct course of the administration's duty or the correct provision of a public service" in instances of a direct, tangible, and current violation of identical material interests of a plurality of users/consumers (Art. 1, par. 1, Leg. Decree 198/2009) caused by the Public Administration's violation of:

  • Terms/deadlines or lack of issuance of general administrative acts that do not have the features of a rule of law and must be issued within a mandatory term fixed by law or regulations;
  • Obligations contained in "charters of services" ("carte di servizi", i.e., the means through which any entity providing public services specifies the standards of its performance, declaring its goals and recognizing specific rights to citizens, users, or consumers. Therefore, through these charters, entities providing public services undertake to respect given quality and quantity standards, with the purpose of monitoring and improving the provision of such services);
  • Quality and economic standards set, as to providers of public services, by the authorities in charge of the regulation and control of the sector and, as to other government entities, by the latter entities according to the applicable provisions (Art. 1, par. 1, Leg. Decree 198/2009).

In practice, the defendant Public Administrations may be government entities, other public bodies, and providers of public services, excluding independent administrative authorities, jurisdictional bodies, legislative assemblies, constitutional bodies, and the Presidency of the Council of Ministers (Art. 1, par. 1-ter, Leg. Decree 198/2009).

Unlike the compensatory class action, which is brought before civil courts, exclusive jurisdiction for public class actions lies with the Italian administrative courts (Art. 1, par. 7, Leg. Decree 198/2009). Indeed, in this context, the Public Administration is not deemed to carry out civil or commercial activities but administrative activities connected to its ability to exercise public powers.

As to procedure, a public class action may be brought only after a warning letter is served on the defendant entity, ordering it to comply with its obligations or remedy its violation within a 90-day term (Art. 3, par. 1, Leg. Decree 198/2009). Only upon expiration of such term, failing a full compliance of the entity with the terms contained in the warning letter, may the right holders bring the action within one year of the expiration of the 90-day term. The statement of claim is then duly published on the official site of the defendant entity, and notice thereof is given to the Italian Public Administration Minister (Art. 1, par. 2, Leg. Decree 198/2009).

Moreover, as to the relief sought, public class actions may be directed only to obtain the removal of the inefficiency in the public service caused by the relevant violation and not to obtain compensation of damages (Art. 1, par. 6, Leg. Decree 198/2009). Hence, a decision upholding the plaintiffs' request will merely order the defendant to remedy its proven wrongdoing. Notice of the decision issued at the end of the proceedings is then duly given in the same fashion the statement of claim is communicated at the outset of the class action (Art. 4, par 2 juncto Art. 1, par. 2, Leg. Decree 198/2009).

In this regard, a few commentators have criticized the advantage given to Public Administrations, which may not be required to compensate damages in public class actions, compared to the less favorable position of commercial operators, which may well be required to compensate damages through the compensatory class action. In particular, this privilege is viewed as being in contrast with the recent effort to increasing efficiency and morality in the conduct of public entities, which is contained inter alia in the above-mentioned Brunetta reform. Although, ultimately, it would be possible to obtain compensation of damages from public entities through ordinary means (Art. 30 of the Code of Administrative Proceedings), such avenue is undoubtedly more burdensome.1


Since the introduction of public class actions, a few cases have been decided by Italian administrative courts, which gave their interpretation to some of the rules governing such procedural tool.

For instance, the Basilicata Region Administrative Regional Tribunal ("T.A.R."), in the judgment T.A.R. Basilicata, September 23, 2011, n. 478, decided on an action inter alia taken by a number of single users/consumers and an association, Agorà Digitale, representing the collective interest of "defending digital freedom and developing internet communications directed to involve and inform the public." The plaintiffs complained that the Basilicata Region did not publish its certified email address on its official website, as provided by law, thus forcing the citizens to physically access the Region's offices in order to use any of the regional services, since they were unable to benefit from the advantages of digital communications. The Basilicata T.A.R. ultimately held that the Region's conduct amounted to a relevant violation and ordered it to publish its certified email address on the Region's website.

However, the Tribunal issued its decision in favor of the above-mentioned association only. In fact, the T.A.R. preliminarily rejected the claim brought by the individual citizens because they merely alleged, abstractly, that the Region's behavior was not compliant with the legislative provisions and failed to prove a direct, tangible, and current violation of their rights (which is specifically prescribed by Art. 1, par. 1, Leg. Decree n. 198/2009, with the aim of preventing public class actions from being used as an alternative tool to the administrative–political control of the actions of Public Administration).

Conversely, the T.A.R. admitted the claim of the mentioned association, stating that, in respect of locus standi of the associations protecting collective interests, it is not necessary to investigate the existence of a tangible violation, given that the harmfulness of the offense is assessed in an abstract manner, in relation to the associations' effective ability to protect the interests of the category that is allegedly harmed by the conduct of the public administration. This part of the decision has been criticized by some commentators, however, based on the fact that the association only incidentally protected the interests of the harmed category (i.e., the rights of the users/consumers to "digitally" access Regional services), whereas its ultimate aim was broader access to digital technology.2

Under a different approach, in a subsequent decision issued by the Lazio Region T.A.R. (T.A.R. Lazio, September 3, 2012, n. 7483, in Guida al diritto 2012, 40, 63), the Tribunal specified that public class actions may in principle be brought by "associations or committees" pursuant to Art. 1, par. 4, Leg. Decree 198/2009. However, under the same provision, these entities  must do so with the aim to "protect the interests of its members," i.e., the holders of legally relevant interests that may be subject to a direct, tangible, and current offense caused by misconducts of the Public Administration. Unlike the Basilicata T.A.R., the Lazio T.A.R. held that the plaintiff consumer association would in principle have been entitled to bring the action, but it should have done so in representation of the interests of its members, specifically indicating, for each of them, the title and the subject matter of their claim. Hence, in the case in question, the Tribunal dismissed the claim inter alia because these elements had not been specified by the plaintiffs.

In addition, the Lazio T.A.R. dismissed the claim for another reason. The plaintiffs based their claims on the fact that the sued Public Administrations did not adopt adequate measures to prevent hydrogeological risks in several different geographical areas. However, the relevant situations were numerous and diverse, and the plaintiffs failed to allege which public act was lacking in each situation. In addition, such situations were described only in general terms by the plaintiffs. Therefore, the T.A.R. dismissed the claim, stating that the general principle of sufficient specificity of the object of judicial claims ("petitum"), which also applies to public class actions, was not respected in the case at hand.3

Finally, in a recent decision issued by the same Lazio Region T.A.R. (T.A.R. Lazio, September 6, 2013, n. 8154), the Tribunal upheld the action taken by a number of plaintiffs complaining that certain Public Administrations systematically failed to meet the set 90-day term in issuing their residence permits and that they suffered inconveniences due to the delay. In particular, they requested the judge: (i) to order the timely issuance of such residence permits and (ii) to take any possible measure to persuade the Public Administrations involved to apply a specific interpretation of the Italian immigration law, as to the merits of the residence permits.

The Tribunal upheld the first request, holding that it fell within the first prerequisite set forth for public class actions by Art. 1, par 1, Leg. Decree 198/2009, given that it concerned the violation of terms to adopt general administrative acts. The second request was dismissed, stating that a class action directed to persuade the Public Administration to adopt a specific interpretation of the law lay outside the scope of application of the public class action itself, as conceived by Leg. Decree 198/2009, and, moreover, it would have amounted to an undue interference with the inherent powers of the Public Administration.

Relationship Between "Compensatory" and "Public" Class Actions

Compensatory and public class actions may overlap when they are brought against providers of public services, which may be sued both in a civil compensatory class action for violations concerning contractual rights of users and consumers, and in a public class action for one of the described inefficiencies in the standards of services provided.

The common requirement for both actions is the violation of rights of a plurality of plaintiffs. However, the actions differ in respect of the results: a compensatory class action, if successful, may end with a decision on the compensation of the damages suffered by the plaintiffs. Conversely, compensation of damages may never be granted by the administrative judge in a public class action. In other words, the first action is directed to obtain monetary compensation of damages, whereas the second is aimed at obtaining the judge's order compelling the government entity or the services' provider to comply with their obligations of duly providing public services to the users/consumers.

In fact, the rationale underlying the two actions is very different. On the one hand, compensatory class actions protect identical rights of consumers and users vis-à-vis companies, in the context of violations deriving from the imbalance of their positions on the market, with results affecting the contacts between the parties (whether contractual or not). On the other hand, public class actions have direct effects on the very process of production and management of public services and are directed to obtain any relevant specific performance.4

As to the risk of parallel proceedings, Art. 2, Leg. Decree n. 198/2009 governs the relationship between the two actions. If, for the same violation, a compensatory class action is already pending, a public class action may not subsequently be brought. However, when a public class action has been brought first, such action shall be stayed until the second compensatory class action has been finally decided.5


1.F. Caringella, M. Protto, Manuale di diritto processuale amministrativo, II edition, Dike, 2012, p. 1535.

2.E. Zampetti, Class action pubblica ed effettività della tutela. Public class action and effectiveness of judicial protection, in Foro amm. TAR 2011, 12, 4104.

3.See comment by D. Giuliani, La c.d. class action pubblica: una tutela potenziale, in Corriere del merito, 2013, fasc. 1, pag. 97-102.

4.Seeinter alia Italian Council of State's Opinion, June 9, 2009, n. 1943.

5.G. Palliggiano, Così il giudice si insinua nelle disfunzioni degli enti, in Guida al Diritto, 12.2.2011, n. 7, p. 40.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions