United States:
What Constitutes An Autodialer? The Debate Continues
04 November 2013
Reed Smith
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
A recent state court decision in California, and before it, a
district court decision in Alabama, both found that equipment used
to facilitate telephone communications must have the current
capacity to randomly or sequentially generate telephone numbers in
order to be considered an "automatic telephone dialing
system." Could these holdings signal a trend towards a more
practical approach to TCPA enforcement or are they simply
aberrations?
Click here to read the issued Client Alert.
This article is presented for informational purposes only
and is not intended to constitute legal advice.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Privacy from United States
Atlas Data And Daniel's Law
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP
Readers of this blog are well aware of the recent surge in data privacy litigation. In February 2024, Atlas Data Privacy Corporation ("Atlas Data")...
Why Data Cleanup Fails – Part Three: Process
Alvarez & Marsal
This includes the very real, tangible and increasingly significant regulatory and legal drivers (e.g., fines) organizations face, and the wider, growing cultural assumptions among customers...