United States: Mofo New York Tax Insights - Fall 2013

"OCCASIONAL SALES" AND SINGLE SALES FACTOR APPORTIONMENT IN CALIFORNIA

By Eric J. Coffill

For decades, California utilized a mandatory corporate franchise tax equally-weighted three factor apportionment formula of payroll, property and sales, thus assigning a 33% weight to the sales factor. In 1993, California double-weighted sales in the three-factor formula, increasing the weight of the sales factor to 50%.1 Recently, following a number of unsuccessful attempts over the years by the California Legislature to change the apportionment formula to mandatory use of single-factor sales, the California voters passed Proposition 39 at the November 6, 2012 General Election requiring, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, corporate taxpayers to apportion using single-factor sales.2 Accordingly, with three possible exceptions,3 current California law relegates payroll and property factor issues to obscurity. For example, a taxpayer with all of its manufacturing capacity (i.e., 100% property) and all of its employees (i.e., 100% payroll) outside of California, but with all of its sales assigned to California, will have a 100% California apportionment formula.4

Now, it is all about sales. If single-factor sales were not enough, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, sales of other than tangible personal property are assigned for sales factor purposes based on a so-called "market" approach, instead of costs of performance.5 Also, recall that for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2011 California returned to a Finnigan approach under which all sales of a combined reporting group properly assigned to California will be included in the California sales factor, regardless of whether the member of the combined group making the sale is subject to California tax.6

The trend toward hyper-weighting the California sales factor—now to 100% sales beginning in 2013—continues to increase the tax value of that factor. There have been, and will continue to be, a wide variety of sales factor issues in California and all those issues now take on a heightened importance in terms of tax effect. One such issue, the inclusion in the sales factor of receipts from so-called "occasional sales," is the subject of this article. As more fully discussed below, California Franchise Tax Board ("FTB") Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) generally provides that when substantial gross receipts arise from an occasional sale of a fixed asset or other property held or used in the regular course of the taxpayer's trade or business, those receipts must be excluded from the sales factor.7

Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A)

Regarding the preliminaries, the sales factor is a fraction, the numerator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer in California during the income year and the denominator of which is all gross receipts everywhere not allocated.8 Over the years, and often following in the footsteps of the Multistate Tax Commission, the FTB has promulgated a number of special regulations under the authority of California Revenue and Taxation Code9 Section 25137, which provides special rules for apportionment. Such special regulations are not to be taken lightly. If a relevant special formula is specifically provided in the FTB's Section 25137 regulations ("25137 Regulations") and the conditions and circumstances delineated in such a regulation are satisfied, the California State Board of Equalization ("SBE") has held that the method of apportionment prescribed in that regulation shall be "the standard" by which taxpayers and the FTB are to compute the taxpayer's apportionment formula.10 In other words, once found to be applicable to the particular situation, 25137 Regulations "will control."11

The FTB's special regulatory sales factor rules for so-called "occasional sales" are found in Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A),12 which provides in full:

(A) Where substantial amounts of gross receipts arise from an occasional sale of a fixed asset or other property held or used in the regular course of the taxpayer's trade or business, such gross receipts shall be excluded from the sales factor. For example, gross receipts from the sale of a factory, patent, or affiliate's stock will be excluded if substantial. For purposes of this subsection, sales of assets to the same purchaser in a single year will be aggregated to determine if the combined gross receipts are substantial.

1. For purposes of this subsection, a sale is substantial if its exclusion results in a five percent or greater decrease in the sales factor denominator of the taxpayer or, if the taxpayer is part of a combined reporting group, a five percent or greater decrease in the sales factor denominator of the group as a whole.

2. For purposes of this subsection, a sale is occasional if the transaction is outside of the taxpayer's normal course of business and occurs infrequently.

Accordingly, the key operative concepts under Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) are: (1) substantial (vs. insubstantial) sales amounts; (2) from an occasional sale; (3) of a fixed asset or other property; (4) which is held or used in the regular course of the taxpayer's trade or business.

"Substantial Amounts"

While "substantial amounts" is a key term long found in Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A), it was only defined therein by the FTB's amendments to the regulation filed on January 30, 2001 and operative as of January 1, 2001.13 The 2001 amendments added the definition, now found in Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A)(1), that a sale is "substantial" if its exclusion results in a 5% or greater decrease in the taxpayer's sales factor denominator or, if the taxpayer is part of a combined reporting group (i.e., is unitary), a 5% or greater decrease in the sales factor denominator of the group as a whole. The FTB staff's explanation for the creation of this 5% standard is that "this number reflects staff's belief that a five percent change in the sales factor denominator is large enough to skew the sales factor in favor of the location of the occasional sale."14 The FTB staff went on to explain the 5% calculation "recognizes that it is the clear reflection of the income of the entire unitary group that is in issue and therefore only a substantial change in the apportionment formula of the group as a whole should trigger the occasional sale throwout."15 This intersection of apportionment and unitary theory means a unitary analysis is an essential component of an occasional sale analysis under the regulation.16

Aside from the FTB "staff's belief," nothing in the regulatory history shows a reasoned basis for the arbitrary, bright-line 5% figure compared to, say, a 4%, a 6%, a 10% or a 20% figure. The FTB staff freely admits that even if the 5% threshold in the regulation is called into play, a taxpayer (or the FTB) still can show the regulation does not properly reflect its activities in California under Section 25137.17 This admission is consistent with the SBE's decision in Fluor Corporation, which stated that any party wishing to deviate from the method prescribed in one of the 25137 Regulations, when found to be applicable, may do so upon establishing by clear and convincing evidence the regulation "does not fairly represent the extent of the taxpayer's business activities" in California.18 Query, is it now easier or harder to demonstrate such fair/unfair representation when the sales factor is the only (i.e., 100%) "business activity" used for apportionment, compared to when the regulation was first written at the time of an equally-weighted (i.e., 33%) three-factor formula or compared to when the regulation was amended to include the 5% threshold at the time of a double-weighted (i.e., 50%) sales factor? Another amendment the FTB made in 2001 was adding language to Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) stating that sales of assets to the "same purchaser" in a single year will be aggregated to determine if the combined gross receipts is "substantial." During the regulatory process, the FTB staff explained this additional language is meant to address transactions that are completed in several steps rather than as one transaction. Although the FTB stated the language is not meant to aggregate unrelated transactions and the reference to the "same purchaser" intentionally "is left without reference to either the single entity or a unitary group context," the FTB also stated "it is proper to conclude that 'purchaser' should be construed to mean individual entity rather than a unitary group."19 However, the FTB staff noted that if it appears that what otherwise would be a single sale has been intentionally spread by a taxpayer into multiple sales to multiple members of a purchaser's unitary group "without a business purpose, the transactions could still be aggregated using a tax avoidance theory."20

"Occasional Sale"

Another key component of Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) is that, for it to apply, the gross receipts must be from an "occasional sale." Prior to the FTB's 2001 amendments, the precise language of Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) read "an incidental or occasional sale." The amendment struck "incidental" from the regulation. The FTB's explanation for removing the term "incidental" during the regulatory process is that:

[S]taff feels the term is not in accord with the regulation's requirement of substantiality. The term implies that a sale is thrown out if it is merely an afterthought of another transaction. Staff believes that such afterthought types of sale will never rise to the level of substantiality required to trigger the regulation.21

Regarding the meaning of "occasional" in the regulation, the 2001 amendments added Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A)(2), which provides that "[f]or purposes of this subsection, a sale is occasional if the transaction is outside of the taxpayer's normal course of business and occurs infrequently."

What is intriguing about this added language in Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A)(2) is the FTB made no attempt to quantify the term "occasional" when revising the regulation. One might argue any such attempt at quantification would be futile as it would be unnecessarily arbitrary (e.g., to create a brightline that less than "X" number of sales within a tax year is "occasional"), but that same objection could be raised equally to the FTB's addition of a 5% bright-line test of "substantial" receipts in Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A)(1). While sales/use tax is generally more a slave to rules than is the law regarding multistate corporate income tax apportionment, California sales tax law has long functioned on the general principle that less than three sales within a period of 12 months is "occasional."22 Instead of quantifying what is an "occasional" sale, the 2001 amendments provide that an occasional sale is one that "occurs infrequently." The 2001 regulatory history is essentially silent as to the rationale for adding the term "infrequently" or the meaning of that term. Thus, as with the "substantial" language in the regulation, the "occasional" standard requires a thoughtful analysis, on a case-by-case basis, taking into account a wide range of facts and circumstances.23

Another significant component of the "occasional sale" analysis under the regulation is the language added in 2001 to Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A)(2) providing that "a sale is occasional if the transaction is outside of the taxpayer's normal course of business . . . ." The FTB explains that the definition of "occasional" in the regulation "is premised upon the regulation only applying to sales of property which are outside of the taxpayer's normal course of business, but, when sold, still give rise to business income" and explains that this concept "is also a reflection of the so-called 'functional test' for business income contained in Revenue and Taxation Code section 25120 . . . ."24 The functional test is one of two alternative tests found in Section 25120 for business income and includes income from tangible and intangible property if the acquisition, management and disposition of the property constitute integral parts of the taxpayer's regular trade or business operations.25 What of the alternative transactional test, whose omission is conspicuous? While only explaining the language in terms of the functional test, the FTB's position likely would be that a sale typically would not be an occasional sale if the gain from the sale was business income under the transactional test.

"Fixed Assets or Other Property"

The last key issue presented under Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) is what type of property is subject to the regulation. Prior to the amendments in 2001, the regulation expressly applied by its terms only to the sale "of a fixed asset," which necessarily excluded sales of intangibles (e.g., stock or goodwill). However, in 1997, FTB Legal Ruling 97-1 ("Ruling") addressed the scope of the regulation and concluded that notwithstanding the fact the language referred only to a "fixed asset," the regulation similarly also should apply to sales of intangible property because "there is no logical basis for distinguishing between fixed assets and intangibles."26 However, in apparent recognition of the fact this conclusion expanded the regulation beyond its express language, the Ruling did not purport to amend the regulation itself. Instead, the Ruling reached its conclusion to include intangibles "under authority of [Revenue and Taxation Code] section 25137 . . . ."27 In other words, the FTB looked to Section 25137 to impliedly write intangible property into the regulation.28

As part of the 2001 amendments, the FTB modified the relevant language of Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) from sale of a "fixed asset" to "fixed asset or other property" to conform to the conclusion reached in the Ruling. Indeed, while a number of other changes also were made at the time, it appears the driving purpose behind the 2001 amendments was to change the regulation to add the FTB's position on including intangibles consistent with the Ruling.29 In the same vein, the regulation was amended at that time to expand the examples of sales from "a factory" to "a factory, patent, or affiliate's stock." The FTB's rationale for expanding the regulation to include sales of "other property" was the change reflected the FTB's position set forth in the Ruling and "[t]here isn't any logical basis for distinguishing between fixed assets and intangibles in the instant context."30 The FTB elaborated this same potential for distortion involving "other property" is "especially true if you're talking about the growth of built-in appreciation, which occurs over a substantial period of time, because taking the gross receipt into account in the year of the recognition event does not reflect the gradual effects of appreciation over several years."31

Interplay Between Section 25137 and Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A)

Note here, again, the continuing issue of the interplay between Section 25137 and Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) addressing "occasional sales." As explained above, the SBE's decision in Fluor Corporation states the 25137 Regulations create "the standard," yet any party remains free to challenge the application of such a regulation under Section 25137. The FTB relied upon this principle and Section 25137 in issuing the Ruling. As also discussed above, the FTB recognizes taxpayers are entitled to take the same approach (i.e., to challenge under Section 25137 the application of a 25137 Regulation). In taking such an approach (and one should always at least consider such an approach based upon the application of the regulation to a specific set of facts and circumstances), bear in mind the legal standards for obtaining relief under Section 25137. California law currently states that for a party (taxpayer or FTB) to invoke Section 25137, that party must satisfy a two-part burden of proving by "clear and convincing evidence" that (1) the approximation provided by the standard formula is not a fair representation and (2) the party's proposed alternative is "reasonable."32 California law also appears to currently state that Section 25137 only applies "where the particular function or activity is qualitatively different from the taxpayer's principal business and the quantitative distortion from inclusion of the receipts of that function or activity . . . is substantial."33 However, it is important to bear in mind that the judicial decisional law setting forth these so-called "quantitative and qualitative" approaches all involved application of Section 25137 in the context of gross versus net receipts from various treasury operations. How the language of those decisions impact the application of Section 25137 in other contexts, such as challenging the application of the FTB's "occasional sale" 25137(c)(1)(A) regulation, and how the merits of showing distortion are to be calculated outside the context of these treasury operation cases are interesting questions and are definitely a fruitful area for innovative thinking.

Conclusion

Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) is just one of many possible examples of issues long lurking in the sales factor computation and just one of many examples of such issues that now take on a heightened importance in terms of their growing potential tax effect under California's new singlefactor sales apportionment formula. Here, one must work through the vagaries of regulatory terms such as "occasional" and "infrequent," as well as assess the composition of the unitary group. Then, one must consider whether the regulation should not apply in any event under the controlling statutory authority of Section 25137. As with many of such California sales factor issues, careful situational application of this regulation, looking to the specific facts and circumstances of each case, is a sound and recommended practice.

Footnotes

1 Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 25128, as amended by Ch. 946, Laws 1993. There were a number of statutory exceptions to double-weighted sales (e.g., taxpayers that derived more than 50% of their gross business receipts from agriculture, extractive business activity, savings and loan activity or banking or financial activity).

2 Proposition 39, entitled the "California Clean Energy Jobs Act," was approved by 61.1% of the voters in the General Election. California Secretary of State, Statewide Summary by County for State Ballot Measures, available at http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2012-general/ssov/ballot-measuressummary- by-county.pdf, last accessed October 18, 2013. Proposition 39 also ended a brief period where, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2010, a taxpayer could make an annual irrevocable election on an original return to apportion income using a single sales factor. See 2009 Budget Trailer Bills, SBX3 15, ABX3 15, Laws 2009. The election only was available to taxpayers otherwise subject to double-weighted sales. See Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 25128, as amended by Ch. 544, Laws 2009; 25128.5, as added by Ch. 17, Laws 2009.

3 The first exception continues to be that certain businesses by statute—taxpayers deriving more than 50% of their gross receipts from agriculture, extractive business activity, savings and loan activity or banking or financial activity—must continue to use an equally-weighted three-factor formula. Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 25128. The second exception is that taxpayers are always free to petition the FTB to use an alternative apportionment formula if use of a single sales factor does not "fairly represent the extent of the taxpayer's business activity in this state . . . ." Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 25137. The third exception involves the pending litigation over a taxpayer's ability to elect to use the equally-weighted three factor formula under the Multistate Tax Compact ("Compact") as incorporated into California law. In The Gillette Company and Subsidiaries v. Franchise Tax Board, review granted January 16, 2013, S206587, the taxpayer contends the Compact (former Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 28008 et seq.) was a binding interstate compact and California is bound by its terms unless and until it withdraws from the Compact. Senate Bill No. 1015, enacted on July 27, 2012, purports to repeal the Compact in full on a prospective basis, but the validity of that repeal likely will be the subject of future litigation on the issue of whether such repeal required a two-thirds vote of the California Legislature.

4 One reasonably might question the constitutionality under Due Process and Commerce Clause grounds of an apportionment formula that gives no recognition to any value-generating activity of a taxpayer other than sales. The U.S. Supreme Court in Container Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board spoke of the need for fairness in the apportionment formula and how the traditional three-factor formula "has gained wide approval precisely because payroll, property, and sales appear in combination to reflect a very large share of the activities by which value is generated." 463 U.S. 159, 183 (1983). Can it be said that the value of a business always, in all conceivable facts and circumstances, fairly can be measured by looking exclusively at sales activity? See Hans Rees' Son, Inc. v. North Carolina, 283 U.S. 123 (1931). On the other hand, a single sales factor has passed Constitutional muster on at least one prior occasion. See Moorman Mfg. Co. v. Bair, 437 U.S. 267 (1978). Further thoughts on this topic will be the subject of a future article.

5 Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 25136.

6 Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 25135; see also Appeal of Finnigan Corp., 88-SBE-022-A (Cal. State Bd. of Equal. Jan. 24, 1990). The impact of returning to a Finnigan approach is somewhat complicated by the fact that California, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2011, adopted a so-called "factor presence test," under which, for example, a corporation is doing business in California and taxable simply by having more than $500,000 of California sales, even if it has no other connection to California and has no physical presence in California. Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 23101.

7 Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18 § 25137(c)(1)(A).

8 The statutory definition of "gross receipts" has changed significantly for taxable years ending on or after January 1, 2011 with respect to a variety of treasury functions, activities and investments. See Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 25120, as amended by Ch. 17 (SB 15), Laws 2009, 3d Extra. Sess.

9 Unless otherwise indicated, all statutory references herein are to the California Revenue and Taxation Code.

10 Appeal of Fluor Corp., 95-SBE-016 (Cal. State Bd. of Equal. Dec. 12, 1995). To the author's knowledge, there is no precedential California court decision on this issue.

11 Id.

12 Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18 § 25137(c)(1)(A).

13 Amendment of Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18 § 25137(c)(1)(A), filed Jan. 30, 2001 (Register 2001, No. 5).

14 Cal. Franchise Tax Bd., Staff Report and Recommendation on Proposed Amendments to Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A), Att. D, p. 1 (FTB Staff Report and Recommendation, Definitions For Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) Text).

15 Id.

16 California courts have generally used two tests to determine whether related business entities are engaged in a unitary business. The first is the "Three Unities Test." Butler Bros. v. McColgan, 17 Cal. 2d 664 (1941), aff'd, 315 U.S. 501 (1942). The second is the "Contribution or Dependency Test." Edison California Stores v. McColgan, 30 Cal. 2d 472 (1947). These two tests are alternative methods for determining unity. A.M. Castle & Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 36 Cal. App. 4th 1794, 1805 (1st Dist. 1995).

17 Cal. Franchise Tax Bd., Staff Report and Recommendation on Proposed Amendments to Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A), Att. D, pp. 1-2 (FTB Staff Report and Recommendation, Definitions For Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) Text).

18 Appeal of Fluor Corp., 95-SBE-016.

19 Cal. Franchise Tax Bd., Staff Report and Recommendation on Proposed Amendments to Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A), Att. A, p. 4 (Synopsis of Comments Received During the Regulation Hearing and Staff Responses and Recommendations).

20 Id.

21 Cal. Franchise Tax Bd., Staff Report and Recommendation on Proposed Amendments to Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A), Att. D, p. 2 (FTB Staff Report and Recommendation, Definitions For Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) Text).

22 Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18 § 1595(a)(1). This California sales tax regulation referring to "occasional sales" states that for purposes of determining whether a seller must obtain a seller's permit, "generally" a person who makes three or more sales for substantial amounts in a period of 12 months is required to hold a seller's permit.

23 While no published, precedential decision has been issued (and is not anticipated), the SBE ruled recently that gross receipts from sales of 13 television stations by a diversified media company were not excluded from the sales factor under Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A) as occasional sales. Appeal of Emmis Communications Corp., SBE Case No. 547964 Meeting of the Bd. of Equal. Transcript (June 11, 2013).

24 Cal. Franchise Tax Bd., Staff Report and Recommendation on Proposed Amendments to Regulation 25137(c)(1)(A), Att. D, p. 2 (FTB Staff Report and Recommendation, Definitions For Regulation

25137(C)(1)(A) Text). 25 See Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 25120; see also Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 25 Cal. 4th 508, 520-26 (2001). The functional test for business income, as compared to the alternative so-called "transactional test," focuses on the income-producing property and, in applying the functional test, the "critical inquiry" is the "relationship between this property and the taxpayer's business operations." Id. at 527 (internal quotations and citation omitted); see also Jim Beam Brands v. Franchise Tax Bd.,133 Cal. App. 4th 514 (1st Dist. 2005).

26 Legal Ruling 97-1, Cal. Franchise Tax Bd. (Oct. 15, 1997).

27 Id.

28 This same approach was taken recently by the Arizona Department of Revenue, whose comparable regulation refers only to the sale of a "fixed asset." The Arizona Department of Revenue found FTB Legal Ruling 97-1 "legally sound and persuasive" and concluded a taxpayer's gross receipts from a (deemed) sale of assets, including goodwill, was excluded from the sales factor. Hearing Officer Decision, No. 201200235, Ariz. Dep't of Rev. (May 31, 2013).

29 See Notice 99-3, Cal. Franchise Tax Bd. Request for Public Comment, Discussion Draft Addition to Regulation 25137(c) (Mar. 29, 1999); see also Cal. Franchise Tax Bd., Regulation Hearing of Proposed Title 18, California Code of Regulations Section 25137(c)(1)(A), Transcript of Proceedings, pp. 5-6 (May 8, 2000).

30 Id. at p. 6.

31 Id.

32 Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 39 Cal. App. 4th 750, 765 (1st Dist. 2006).

33 General Mills, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 208 Cal. App. 4th 1290, 1301 (2012), citing Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 39 Cal. 4th 750, 766 (2006) and Limited Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 152 Cal. App. 4th 1491, 1498 (1st Dist. 2007) (emphasis in original).

To view this article please click here.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Kara M. Kraman
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

    Disclaimer

    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

    Registration

    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

    Cookies

    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

    Links

    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

    Mail-A-Friend

    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

    Emails

    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

    Security

    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions