CMS Issues Redacted Advisory Opinion Regarding Physician Referrals To Specialty Hospitals

Last week, CMS made available a redacted advisory opinion regarding the Medicare Modernization Act's ("MMA's") 18-month moratorium on physician referrals to specialty hospitals in which the physician (or his immediate family member) has an ownership or investment interest. The opinion focuses on the Stark law which prohibits such physician referrals unless an exception applies.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Last week, CMS made available a redacted advisory opinion regarding the Medicare Modernization Act's ("MMA's") 18-month moratorium on physician referrals to specialty hospitals in which the physician (or his immediate family member) has an ownership or investment interest. The opinion focuses on the Stark law which prohibits such physician referrals unless an exception applies. CMS acknowledged that the provider in question may qualify for one of these exceptions known as the "whole hospital" exception. A physician satisfies this exception if: (1) he or she is authorized to perform services at the hospital; (2) his or her ownership or investment interest is in the entire hospital and not a subdivision of the hospital; and (3) the hospital is not a specialty hospital for the 18 month period beginning on December 8, 2003 and ending on June 8, 2005, as per the MMA. The MMA defines a "specialty hospital," in part, as one that is primarily or exclusively engaged in the care and treatment of patients with cardiac or orthopedic conditions, or patients that are receiving surgical procedures. However, "specialty hospital" does not include hospitals "under development" as of November 18, 2003. CMS agreed with the provider that its hospital was indeed under development as of November 18, 2003 because certain events had occurred as of that date, including completion of architectural plans, receiving necessary funding, satisfying zoning requirements, and receiving approvals from appropriate state agencies. Accordingly, CMS concluded that the specialty hospital moratorium did not apply to the provider in this case. The complete advisory opinion is available on the CMS website at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/medlearn/ao-sh-2004-06-01.pdf.

This material is not intended to create, and does not create, an attorney-client relationship between you and Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., and you should not act or rely on any of this information. As legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case, nothing provided herein should be used as a substitute for advice of competent counsel. These materials do not constitute legal advice, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. or any of its attorneys or clients, and are not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date. Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. assumes no liability for the use or interpretation of information contained herein. This publication is provided "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. Unless otherwise indicated, V&E attorneys listed are: not Certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. None of the attorneys listed on this website is certified as an "expert" or "specialist" pursuant to any authority governing the practice of law in New York. Vinson & Elkins is a registered limited liability partnership. Principal office-Houston.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More