ARTICLE
9 October 2013

IP Attorneys Provide Insight On Proving Indirect Infringement in Bloomberg BNA

RG
Ropes & Gray LLP

Contributor

Ropes & Gray is a preeminent global law firm with approximately 1,400 lawyers and legal professionals serving clients in major centers of business, finance, technology and government. The firm has offices in New York, Washington, D.C., Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, London, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Tokyo and Seoul.
On Oct. 4, Bloomberg BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal published an article titled "Proving Indirect Infringement: Is Post-Suit Knowledge of a Patent Sufficient?" by IP litigation partner Brian Biddinger and IP litigation associate Keyna Chow.
United States Intellectual Property

On Oct. 4, Bloomberg BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal published an article titled "Proving Indirect Infringement: Is Post-Suit Knowledge of a Patent Sufficient?" by IP litigation partner Brian Biddinger and IP litigation associate Keyna Chow. The article examines the Supreme Court's decision in Global-Tech, as well as opinions at the Federal Circuit and district court level, regarding pre-suit knowledge of the patent in inducement cases. It also provides key considerations for parties involved in these kind of disputes. 

Click here to read this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More