ARTICLE
23 September 2013

Lessons Learned From The First Year Of The PTAB Post-Grant Proceedings: A Three-Part Series

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
On September 16, 2012, the post-grant proceedings under the AIA went into effect and became a new tool in the patent practitioner’s toolbox.
United States Intellectual Property

On September 16, 2012, the post-grant proceedings under the AIA went into effect and became a new tool in the patent practitioner's toolbox. The much anticipated new PTAB proceedings have clearly sparked a renewed interest for out-of-court patent challenges. In this three-part series, we review the past year of many "firsts" related to these new proceedings and recap the strategies that have been employed and the valuable lessons learned. In Part 1, we look at how IPR petitioners have tipped the "reasonable likelihood" standard in their favor. In Part 2, we recap an exciting year of CBM proceedings, including the first ever CBM oral hearing and decision. Finally, Part 3 offers a glimpse of what supplemental examination offers to patentees and how the proceeding has been utilized so far.

Editor: Michele C. Bosch

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More