United States: Wealth Management Update

September Interest Rates for GRATs, Sales to Defective Grantor Trusts, Intra-Family Loans and Split Interest Charitable Trusts

The September § 7520 rate for use with estate planning techniques such as CRTs, CLTs, QPRTs and GRATs is 2.0%, which is the same as the August rate and an increase from July's rate of 1.2%. The applicable federal rate ("AFR") for use with a sale to a defective grantor trust, self-canceling installment note ("SCIN") or intra-family loan with a note of 9-year duration (the midterm rate, compounded annually) is 1.66%, which is up from the August rate of 1.63% and the July rate of 1.22%. Remember that lower rates work best with GRATs, CLATs, sales to defective grantor trusts, private annuities, SCINs and intra-family loans. The combination of a low § 7520 rate and financial and real estate markets which remain undervalued presents a potentially rewarding opportunity to fund GRATs in August with depressed assets you expect to perform better in the relatively near future.

Clients also should continue to consider refinancing existing intra-family loans. The AFRs (based on annual compounding) used in connection with intra-family loans in September are 0.25% for loans with a term of 3 years or less, 1.66% for loans with a term of 9 years or less, and 3.28% for loans with a term of longer than 9 years. Thus, for example, if a 9-year loan is made to a child and the child can invest the funds and obtain a return in excess of 1.66%, the child will be able to keep any returns over 1.66%. These same rates are used in connection with sales to defective grantor trusts.

United States v. Windsor and Rev. Rul. 2013-17 and I.R.S. News Release IR-2013-72

On August 29, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (the "Service") issued Revenue Ruling  2013-17 and I.R.S. News Release IR-2013-72 in response to the United States Supreme Court's (the "Supreme Court") decision in United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. --- (2013), which determined that Sec. 3 of 1996's "Defense of Marriage Act" ("DOMA") was unconstitutional as a violation of the liberties guaranteed to same-sex married persons under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Rev. Rul. 2013-17

Rev. Rul. 2013-17 consists of two distinct conclusions. The first conclusion is that the Code must be read in a gender-neutral manner with respect to "marriage" and "spouse" so that that the Code provisions for "marriage" and "spouse" include same-sex spouses.  In retrospect, this conclusion was probably already assumed by practitioners but clarifies existing law by applying Windsor to the Code.  If it is unconstitutional under Windsor to classify marriages based on sexual preference, it is logical to presume that any terms under the Code that could be interpreted as relating to a sexual preference distinction with respect to marriage must be interpreted in a neutral way. 

The second conclusion resolved a much-debated issue within the tax practitioner community in that a same-sex married couple's state of residency is irrelevant for purposes of Federal recognition of the marriage so long as the individuals are lawfully married in a domestic or foreign jurisdiction whose laws authorize same-sex marriage.  Therefore, if a same-sex couple marries in New York and moves to Florida (which does not recognize same-sex marriage), the couple will be considered to be married for all purposes of the Code even if such marriage was the result of "forum shopping" for a jurisdiction that would marry the same-sex couple. 

At the end of the ruling, the Service noted that for Federal tax purposes, the term "marriage" does not include registered domestic partnerships, civil unions, or other similar formal relationships recognized under state law that are not denominated as a marriage under that state's law, and the terms "spouse," "husband and wife," "husband," and "wife" do not include individuals who have entered into such a formal relationship.

I.R.S. News Release IR-2013-72

In Notice IR-2013-72, the Service provides guidance for same-sex married couples for amending prior returns, providing that such authority is voluntary and not mandatory, and that such ability only extends to currently "open" taxable years. With respect to the open tax years, the Service gives credence to the proposition that an unconstitutional determination renders a statute as inoperative as if it had never been passed and never existed so as to be void ab initio.  Such a determination would allow a taxpayer to file amended returns for such prior years based on the law as it now exists as to such time period, i.e., as if the applicable statute were not then in existence.  This is to be contrasted by the repeal of a statute without retroactive effect – in that instance, the statute was valid for such prior years so the ability to claim a refund in the absence of such statute should not be present.

However, what if the tax year is closed under the applicable statute of limitations?  Should the unconstitutionality cause the year to be re-opened? The Service was silent on this position, which is, from the Service's perspective, the proper course of action. The law is likely on the side of the Service in that, courtesy of the ability to file for a protective claim for refund, the Code provides an adequate post-deprivation remedy and therefore the unconstitutionality of § 3 of DOMA is not sufficient to overcome the applicable statute of limitations. ("DOMA"), which defined marriage for purposes of federal law as a marriage between a man and a woman, is unconstitutional and that the concept of defining "marriage" is the domain of the States.

The Supreme Court's ruling provides same-sex spouses the same recognition and benefits under federal law as opposite-sex spouses. In the estate planning arena, such benefits include, but are not limited to: (1) filing joint income tax returns; (2) the unlimited marital deduction for gift and estate tax purposes; (3) splitting of inter-vivos gifts; (4) electing portability of the deceased spouse's unused applicable exclusion amount; (5) naming a spouse as the beneficiary under a qualified retirement account and allowing the surviving spouse to "roll over" the account into his or her own account, thereby potentially extending the ultimate payout of the account; (6) simplifying the basis and contribution rules with respect to jointly owned property; (7) eliminating adverse tax consequences for the transfer of property pursuant to a marriage settlement agreement; and (8) granting certain social security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits.

However, a debate has ensued regarding whether these new benefits are available to same-sex spouses who married in a jurisdiction that recognizes same-sex marriage but reside in a jurisdiction that does not recognize same-sex marriage or available only to same-sex spouses who reside in a jurisdiction that recognizes same-sex marriage. Arguments have been made for each position, and estate planning practitioners will need guidance from the IRS and the Treasury to resolve the issue.

United Statesv. Tyler, --- F.3d --- (3rd Cir. 2013)

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals held that co-executors of a deceased taxpayer's estate are personally liable for the cash proceeds of the taxpayer's 1/2 interest in real property that the co-executors sold without applying the proceeds to the taxpayer's federal tax debt.

The IRS assessed the taxpayer in 2002 for income tax from prior years. The taxpayer and his wife owned their residence as tenants by the entireties, but in 2003, the taxpayer transferred his interest in the residence to his wife for $1, which severed the tenancy by the entireties. The IRS filed a notice of federal tax lien on the property in 2004. The taxpayer died in 2006 and his wife died shortly after. The Tyler court affirmed that the lien attached to the property when the taxpayer was assessed and remained with the property when it became part of the estate of the taxpayer's wife because the tenancy by the entireties was severed and because she did not pay "adequate and full consideration" for her interest under § 6323(h)(6). The court acknowledged that the lien would not have survived the taxpayer's death had the tenancy by the entireties not been severed.

The couple's son (the sole heir and a co-executor) sold the residence in 2008 and lost the proceeds investing in the stock market. The Tyler court affirmed that the co-executors were required under the federal insolvency statute, 31 U.S.C. § 3713, to pay the U.S. government "first when ... the estate of a deceased debtor ... is not enough to pay all the debts of the debtor." Therefore, the co-executors were personally liable for the cash proceeds from the sale of the deceased taxpayer's property that was encumbered by a federal tax lien.

CLAT Assets Not Includible in Settlor's Gross Estate – PLR201323007

The IRS privately ruled that the taxpayer's transfer to a charitable lead annuity trust ("CLAT") that will pay the annuity to a private foundation in which the taxpayer is a director was a completed gift for gift tax purposes, the gift qualifies for the gift tax charitable deduction and none of the CLAT's assets will be included in the taxpayer's gross estate.

The taxpayer created a CLAT of which he could not serve as the trustee. In addition, the beneficiary of the CLAT income interest was a private foundation established by the taxpayer and his wife (the "Foundation") of which the taxpayer and his wife and children were directors. The Foundation's bylaws provided that (1) a director who establishes a charitable trust of which the Foundation is a beneficiary is prohibited from involvement in and decisions of matters concerning the receipt, investment, grant or distribution of the funds received by the Foundation from such charitable trust and (2) any funds received from a charitable trust be segregated into a separate and dedicated account for such funds to clearly trace the funds into and out of the separate account.

The IRS ruled that the taxpayer's transfer to the CLAT was a completed gift for gift tax purposes and qualifies for the gift tax charitable deduction even though the taxpayer is a Foundation director.  This was allowed because the taxpayer is not permitted to vote on matters relating to disbursement or grants of funds received from the Trust and any funds received by the Foundation from the CLAT are segregated into a separate account. For similar reasons, the IRS ruled that the taxpayer retains no interest or reversion in the CLAT and, therefore, the CLAT's assets will not be included in the taxpayer's gross estate.

Graev v. Comm'r, 140 T.C. 17 (2013)

The Tax Court concluded that a married couple was not entitled to a charitable contribution for their gift of cash and a conservation easement to an architectural trust because the donation was improperly conditioned on whether the IRS would allow their claimed deduction.

A taxpayer gifted a facade conservation easement and cash to the National Architectural Trust ("NAT"). Prior to the contribution, the taxpayer expressed concern to NAT that, based on a recent IRS Notice, the IRS intended to crack down on improper charitable contribution deductions for transfers of easements on real property to charitable organizations. NAT replied that it was NAT's standard policy "to refund a cash contribution to the extent the IRS disallowed the donor's deduction for the related easement." The taxpayer asked NAT to memorialize NAT's assurance in a "side letter" separate from the easement application which stated that should the IRS disallow the deductions in their entirety, NAT would refund the taxpayer's cash contribution and join with the taxpayer to remove the facade conservation easement from the property's title. Furthermore, the recorded deed reserved NAT's power to do so.

The IRS issued the taxpayer and his wife a notice of deficiency disallowing the cash and non-cash charitable deductions because the contributions were "made subject to subsequent event(s)." The tax court upheld the IRS's findings and concluded (based on existing case law and the taxpayer's awareness that the IRS was giving extra scrutiny to similar deductions) that at the date of the taxpayer's contribution, the possibility that the IRS would disallow the deduction and that NAT would return the cash to the taxpayer and remove the easement was not "so remote as to be negligible." The Graev court stated, "A substantial risk obviously arose from the IRS's then-announced intention to scrutinize charitable contribution deductions for facade easement contributions, and that risk is evident from Mr. Graev's insistence on NAT's issuing the side letter."

Belk v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2013-154 (2013)

The Tax Court denied a motion for reconsideration of its previous denial of an income tax deduction for a contribution of a conservation easement, where the donor and the charity agreed that the donor could substitute other assets for the contributed property, because the donor failed to donate an interest in real property that was subject to a use restriction granted in perpetuity.

In 1994, the taxpayers transferred their 410 acre farm to the taxpayers' LLC which developed the property as a residential community and golf course. In 2004, the LLC executed a conservation easement agreement with the Smoky Mountain National Land Trust (the "Land Trust") for the land where the golf course was located. The conservation easement provided that the taxpayers and the Land Trust could change the property that is subject to the easement.

Under § 170(h), to be a qualified conservation contribution, the contribution must be of a "qualified real property interest," which is defined as a "restriction (granted in perpetuity) on the use which may be made of the real property." The Belk court rejected the notion of a "floating easement" and found that "section 170(h)(2)(C) requires that taxpayers donate an interest in an 'identifiable, specific piece of real property.'" The Belk court determined that it was the intent of the parties to permit substitutions because the conservation easement agreement permitted substitutions, and, therefore, the taxpayers did not agree to restrict their use of the donated property in perpetuity.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions