United States: CFPB Amends Remittance Transfer Rule And Updates Small Business Compliance Guide (Consumer Financial Services Alert - August 20, 2013)

Last Updated: August 30 2013
Article by Crystal N. Kaldjob, Allen C. Myers and Brandon T. Thompson

The CFPB released an updated compliance guide to assist small creditors in complying with the remittance transfer rule. The guide is intended to be an "easy-to-use summary" of the remittance rule and highlight issues that small creditors may face when implementing the rule. The updated guide incorporates the CFPB's changes to the remittance transfer rule including the disclosure of institution fees and foreign taxes and the procedures that apply to errors that result from a consumer providing incorrect information.

In conjunction with the release of the small business compliance guide, the CFPB announced that it made clarifying and technical corrections to the rule amended in May 2013 (see May 14, 2013 Alert). In particular, the CFPB amended the provision setting forth remedies for errors that occur when a sender provides incorrect or insufficient information to the remittance transfer provider.

FPB and Federal Agencies Propose Amendments to Appraisal Rule for Higher-Priced Mortgages

The CFPB and five other federal regulators—the FRB, FDIC, FHFA, NCUA, and OCC—issued a proposal to further amend Regulation Z, with regard to appraisal requirements for a subset of higher-priced mortgage loans. The agencies previously amended Regulation Z with respect to higher-priced mortgage loans to change the escrow maintenance requirements (see January 22, 2013 Alert) and create exemptions from certain appraisal requirements (see July 23, 2013 Alert). This proposal seeks to create additional exemptions from the appraisal requirements for higher-priced mortgage loans for: (1) transactions secured solely by existing manufactured homes and not land, (2) "streamlined" refinancings, specifically those where the owner or guarantor of the refinancing is the owner or guarantor of the existing obligation and other requirements are met, and (3) extensions of credit of $25,000 or less. The agencies seek comment on over 50 questions raised in the proposal, including matters such as whether to place additional conditions on the transactions proposed for exemption and input on existing and alternative valuation methods. Comments must be received on or before September 9, 2013.

CFPB Amends Examination Procedures for Mortgage Rules and Updates Small Business Compliance Guide

The CFPB issued updates to its examination procedures for the Truth in Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act to incorporate the mortgage rules finalized by the CFPB in January 2013 (see January 10, 2013 Alert for discussion of ability-to-repay final rule and January 22, 2013 Alert for discussion of mortgage servicing rules). In addition to changes to the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage rule, the updated examination procedures cover rules governing high-cost mortgages and appraisals for higher-priced mortgages; amendments to the escrows rule; and changes to credit card rules. The CFPB notes a focus on the following areas: lenders' consideration of borrowers' ability to repay in making lending decisions; the banning or limiting of certain points, fees, and "risky features"; requirements for providing monthly statements and disclosures; restrictions on dual-tracking (processing foreclosure and loan modifications simultaneously on parallel tracks); requirements for access to servicer personnel and licensing/certification requirements for appraisers. 

In conjunction with the release of the amended examination procedures for the mortgage rules, the CFPB also updated its small business compliance guide for the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage rule (see April 16, 2013 Alert for previous compliance guide). The updated guide incorporates changes made to the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage rule in June and July (see June 11, 2013 Alert).

CFPB Seeks Public Comment on Information Collection

The CFPB solicited comments on a proposed information collection titled, "Development of Metrics to Measure Financial Well-being of Working-age and Older American Consumers." The CFPB intends to collect quantitative data to develop and refine survey instruments to measure adult consumers' financial well-being. The information collection seeks public input on: (1) whether the collection of information is necessary for the performance of the CFPB's functions; (2) whether the CFPB's estimated burden of collecting information is accurate; (3) ways to enhance the information being collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden on respondents. Comments are due by October 7, 2013.

FTC Settles with Consumer Reporting Agency for Violations of FCRA

The FTC reached a settlement with a nationwide specialty consumer reporting agency for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Section 5 of the FTC Act. FCRA imposes special obligations for nationwide specialty consumer reporting agencies, which are generally consumer reporting agencies that compile and maintain files on consumers on a nationwide basis relating to, among other things, check writing history. Under FCRA, nationwide specialty consumer reporting agencies are required to, among other things, provide consumers with free file disclosures.

The complaint alleged that the consumer reporting agency, in violation of FCRA, did not follow proper dispute procedures, mainly failures in the reinvestigation process, and failed to follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the consumer report information it was providing. The FTC also alleged that the consumer reporting agency violated parts of FCRA's furnisher rule, which, among other things, requires consumer reporting agencies to provide free annual file disclosures and to have a streamlined process to obtain such disclosures. The FTC maintained that the consumer reporting agency failed to create a streamlined process for consumers and failed to establish reasonable written policies and procedures regarding the accuracy and integrity of the information it furnished. In particular, the FTC alleged that consumers had difficulty in obtaining their annual file disclosures from the consumer reporting agency because the consumer reporting agency required consumers to submit more information than was reasonably necessary to properly identify the consumers before it would provide the annual file disclosures. The terms of the settlement require the consumer reporting agency to pay civil money penalties, improve its dispute procedures and comply with the furnisher rule by maintaining a streamlined process for consumers to request their free annual reports.

The FTC's settlement comes after the CFPB issued a warning to consumer reporting agencies. In December 2012, the CFPB previously released a guidance bulletin setting forth its expectations for nationwide specialty consumer reporting agencies and after an investigation, issued warning letters detailing consumer reporting agencies' failure to comply with FCRA and Regulation V, the implementing regulation for FCRA (see December 11, 2012 Alert).

Ninth Circuit Holds HAMP Obligated Bank to Offer Permanent Loan Modification

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a lower court's dismissal of two lawsuits by borrowers who alleged that their loan servicer breached an agreement to offer a permanent loan modification after the borrowers made all required payments under their trial payment plan. The borrowers alleged that defendant, a bank, never offered them a permanent loan modification despite an agreement for permanent modification if the borrowers complied with the requirements of their trial payment plan. The lower court dismissed the borrowers' actions holding that the language of the trial payment plan could not support a contract for a permanent loan modification. The lower court also ruled that defendant's promise to offer a permanent modification was conditioned on sending the borrowers a signed modification agreement, which defendant did not do. The borrowers appealed.

Citing Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 673 F.3d 547 (7th Cir. 2012), the Ninth Circuit, rejected defendant's argument that, pursuant to the  terms of the trial payment plan, no permanent modification exists until the servicer, at its sole discretion, sends the borrower a permanent modification agreement. To the contrary, the Ninth Circuit opined that "[t]he more natural and fair interpretation of the [trial payment plan] is that the servicer must send a signed Modification Agreement offering to modify the loan once borrowers meet their end of the bargain." The Ninth Circuit noted the importance of determining the borrower's qualifications for the Home Affordable Modification Program at the time it agreed to extend the trial payment plan. If the borrower does not qualify for HAMP, the Ninth Circuit reasoned, "it could have and should have denied [the borrower] a modification on that basis" instead of offering the trial payment plan. Ultimately, the Ninth Circuit ruled that an oral agreement to make the trial payment plan permanent could support a breach of contract claim (i.e., no written agreement was required). Notably, the Ninth Circuit recognized that if a borrower fails to provide all documents required under the trial payment plan, the servicer may assert this failure as a basis for not making a modification permanent. 

Of import was the particularly stinging concurring opinion by Judge John Noonan. Asserting that the "self-contradictory" trial payment plan served no purpose "except the fraudulent purpose of inducing [the borrower] to make the payments while the bank retained the option of modifying the loan or stiffing him," Judge Noonan argued that defendant drafted the trial payment plan agreement, and therefore, should be held to it.

New York Department of Financial Services Issues Letters to Banks

As a result of its investigation into illegal online payday lending, the New York Department of Financial Services announced that it sent cease and desist letters to numerous payday lenders directing them to cease offering to lend and lending money at usurious rates. Under New York law loans made by non-bank lenders in the amount of $250,000 or less with an interest rate that exceeds 16% per annum constitute civil usury. Further, loans made with interest rates exceeding 25% per annum constitute criminal usury. DFS's investigation uncovered that numerous out-of-state lenders were using the internet to solicit and provide illegal payday loans in violation of the New York's usury limits. DFS noted that it "will aggressively pursue appropriate enforcement against payday lenders that refuse to cease and desist their illegal activity in New York."

Of import, DFS cited access to the Automated Clearing House network as the main method by which these payday lenders are able to conduct their illegal activities, and sent letters to over 100 banks requesting their assistance in cutting off illegal payday lenders' access to the ACH network. This is the second such effort by DFS to curb payday lending. In March 2013, DFS issued warning letters to debt collectors about collecting illegal, usurious loans made in New York, including payday loans made over the internet, by phone or by mail (see March 5, 2013 Alert).

State Banking Regulators Settle with Mortgage Lender for Licensing Violations

Several states have settled with a mortgage lender for violations of various state licensing laws. After an investigation into the practices of the mortgage lender, state banking regulators determined that the lender was engaged in mortgage loan origination activities for which a mortgage loan originator licensed was required. The terms of the settlement require the mortgage lender to eliminate certain positions within its organization, require its loan originators to obtain mortgage origination licenses, provide the regulators with scripts it develops for its unlicensed employees when speaking with borrowers and provide quarterly reports to the regulators. The lender also agreed to reimburse the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities for its investigative costs and pay over $2 million in civil money penalties to various state banking regulators.

New York Department of Financial Services Seeks to Regulate Virtual Currency

After reportedly issuing subpoenas to several companies affiliated with bitcoins, the New York Department of Financial Services announced it was determining whether to regulate bitcoins and other virtual currencies. According to DFS, regulation of virtual currency will lend legitimacy and stability to the fledgling industry, and suggests establishing "safety and soundness requirements" so that funds entrusted to virtual currency companies "will not get stuck in a digital black hole." DFS also warned that penalties could result from facilitating criminal activity, and argues that, like "any other industry, greater transparency and accountability [are] critical to promoting sustained, long-term investment." The notice of inquiry seeks comment and information on whether virtual currencies are more appropriately regulated through augmenting existing money transmission regulations, or issuing entirely new, industry-specific regulatory guidelines.

Goodwin Procter LLP is one of the nation's leading law firms, with a team of 700 attorneys and offices in Boston, Los Angeles, New York, San Diego, San Francisco and Washington, D.C. The firm combines in-depth legal knowledge with practical business experience to deliver innovative solutions to complex legal problems. We provide litigation, corporate law and real estate services to clients ranging from start-up companies to Fortune 500 multinationals, with a focus on matters involving private equity, technology companies, real estate capital markets, financial services, intellectual property and products liability.

This article, which may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions, is provided with the understanding that it does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Goodwin Procter LLP or its attorneys. © 2013 Goodwin Procter LLP. All rights reserved.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions