CMS Releases Final Rule Revising Criteria For Classifying Hospitals As Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities

On April 30, 2004, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") announced the final rule revising the criteria for classifying hospitals as inpatient rehabilitation facilities ("IRFs") for purposes of Medicare payment. CMS states that in response to extensive public comment it has modified a number of provisions found in the proposed rule.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

On April 30, 2004, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") announced the final rule revising the criteria for classifying hospitals as inpatient rehabilitation facilities ("IRFs") for purposes of Medicare payment. CMS states that in response to extensive public comment it has modified a number of provisions found in the proposed rule. Specifically, the final rule: (i) increases from 10 to 13 the number of medical conditions that qualify as conditions used to classify a facility as an IRF; (ii) sets forth a 3-year transition period with annual increases to the number of patients in the IRF that must have a medical condition that meets one of the 13 medical conditions; (iii) establishes an administrative presumption that if the IRF's Medicare population complies with the rule, the facility's total population complies; (iv) counts patients with secondary medical conditions that match one of the 13 criteria as qualifying patients; and (v) changes the period of time to review patient data to determine compliance from the most recent 12-month cost reporting period to the most recent, appropriate, and consecutive 12-month time period. The final rule will be published in the May 7th Federal Register and will become effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2004.

This material is not intended to create, and does not create, an attorney-client relationship between you and Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., and you should not act or rely on any of this information. As legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case, nothing provided herein should be used as a substitute for advice of competent counsel. These materials do not constitute legal advice, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. or any of its attorneys or clients, and are not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date. Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. assumes no liability for the use or interpretation of information contained herein. This publication is provided "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. Unless otherwise indicated, V&E attorneys listed are: not Certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. None of the attorneys listed on this website is certified as an "expert" or "specialist" pursuant to any authority governing the practice of law in New York. Vinson & Elkins is a registered limited liability partnership. Principal office-Houston.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More