United States: Absolute Privilege Recognized For Auditors That Act As Required By Law

Last Updated: August 6 2013
Article by Bennett Lasko

On May 30, 2013, the Nevada Supreme Court issued a little-noticed decision that could have big implications for disputes between auditors and their clients.  The case, Cucinotta v. Deloitte & Touche LLP, held that Deloitte & Touche LLP (Deloitte) was absolutely privileged against civil liability for reporting allegedly defamatory information to its client's audit committee pursuant to express requirements of the federal securities laws.1  While the decision is narrowly drawn, it implies a broad defense for auditors who do what they are required to do – whether by federal or state law, regulatory action, or professional standards – and adds a potentially valuable tool for managing disputes with audit clients. 

The Nevada Case

In the course of audit work for an unrelated client, Deloitte obtained a copy of an FBI intelligence bulletin containing allegations of serious criminal activity by two executives of its client Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. (GCA).   Because the intelligence bulletin contained "information indicating that an illegal act . . . may have occurred," Deloitte concluded that it had a duty under Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to disclose the allegations to the GCA audit committee.2   

An investigation conducted by an independent law firm ultimately identified no evidence of misconduct either by the company or the executives named in the FBI bulletin.  Nevertheless, the two executives were forced to resign.  Although not discussed in the court's opinion, the pleadings reveal that the executives threatened to sue Deloitte.  As required by professional standards, Deloitte informed the audit committee that the threat of litigation undermined its independence and would require Deloitte to withdraw as the company's auditor.  The company thereafter requested the executives to withdraw the threat and, when they refused, requested their resignations. 

The two executives filed suit against Deloitte alleging defamation, tortious interference with their contracts with GSC and tortious interference with prospective business advantage.   Following limited discovery, the lower court granted summary judgment in favor of Deloitte and the executives appealed.   

The Nevada Supreme Court's decision is straightforward.  The court adopted Section 592A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which provides that "[o]ne who is required by law to publish defamatory matter is absolutely privileged to publish it."3  The court noted several decisions of other courts applying Section 592A in a variety of contexts.  Although neither the court nor the parties' briefs identified any precedent for applying Section 592A to communications by an auditor, the Court readily found that the Section accorded Deloitte's communications an absolute privilege as a matter of law.  Summary judgment, therefore, was affirmed. 

Implications As Precedent

The Nevada court was careful to limit the scope of its decision.  The court emphasized that the "class of absolutely privileged communications . . . remains narrow and is limited to those communications made in judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings . . . [or] in the discharge of a duty under express authority of law."  On the facts, the court addressed only the narrow situation of information specifically required to be disclosed to the specific audience identified in a federal securities statute that specifically regulates the audit relationship.  But the decision stands as precedent for significantly broader protections in several respects.  

First, although Section 592A on its face provides a defense only to an action for defamation, the Nevada court also relied on the Section to affirm summary judgement on the  executives' claims for tortious interference.  As the court noted, the underlying rationale for Section 592A is that "one who is required by law to do an act does not incur liability for doing it."4  This common-sense principle implies not only immunity from suit on defamation grounds, but on any grounds.  The court's disposition of the tortious interference claims supports this construction.

Moreover, there is no principled reason to limit an auditor's immunity to communications required by the federal securities laws.  Auditors regularly are required to make disclosures and report information under many other statutes and regulations, as well as professional standards.  Although professional standards are not themselves laws, auditors are legally obligated to comply with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) as a matter of contract (i.e., their engagement letters), state tort law (which allows malpractice actions for failing to comply with GAAS), and the state statutes and regulations governing the licensure of public accountants.5

Again, a closer look at the Nevada case demonstrates the point.  The executives' claims against Deloitte were not limited to Deloitte's disclosure of the allegedly defamatory information in the FBI bulletin.  The executives did not lose their jobs because of that disclosure.  To the contrary, they were exonerated by an independent investigation.  The executives only lost their jobs after Deloitte advised the board of directors that the executives' threat of litigation would require Deloitte to resign as the company's auditor.  Although the opinion does not discuss the issue, the court's disposition effectively extended the absolute privilege to Deloitte's communication, as required by professional standards, that it would resign if the threat of litigation was not resolved. 

This result, like the underlying rationale set forth in the Restatement itself, suggests a broad rule that auditors should be privileged against liability in any situation in which they act as they are required to act, regardless of the source of that obligation. 

Managing Client Disputes

The specific facts of the Deloitte case were highly unusual.  But auditors frequently have disagreements with management or other client personnel about how information identified in an audit should be interpreted, whether that information is material, or what should be reported to an audit committee, a regulator, or in the client's financial statements.  Occasionally, these disputes boil over into litigation.   

In one recent, widely publicized case, a regional accounting firm suffered a multi-million dollar adverse jury verdict in a dispute with notable similarities to the case in Nevada.  Many of the key facts were hotly disputed, but the basic outline involved a disagreement with management over accounting estimates, the auditors reporting that disagreement to the board, an actual or alleged threat of litigation against the audit firm, and the firm thereafter resigning from the engagement pursuant to independence requirements.   

The Nevada decision suggests that auditors can mount a powerful defense in client disputes by showing that they acted as required by applicable legal requirements and professional standards.  If, like Deloitte, an auditor concludes that it is required to act in a manner that might precipitate a dispute, the auditor should take care to document that conclusion and the basis for it.  Relevant communications should be made in writing, or promptly memorialized in writing, so that there is a clear record of what was said.  When client relationships or communications become contentious, auditors may have opportunities to protect themselves by carefully structuring their responses within the framework of applicable laws and professional standards.  


1.Cucinotta v. Deloitte & Touche LLP, No. 58727, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 35 (en banc May 30, 2013).

2.Section 10A provides, in relevant part, that when an independent public accounting firm "becomes aware of information indicating that an illegal act . . . has or may have occurred, the firm shall . . . inform the appropriate level of the management of the issuer and assure that the audit committee of the issuer, . . . is adequately informed with respect to [such] illegal acts . . . ."  15 U.S.C. § 78j-1(b)(1).  

3.Rest. (2d) Torts § 592A (1977).

4.Slip. Op. at 6, quoting Rest. (2d) Torts § 592A, cmt. a (1977). 

5.E.g., 68 Ill. Admin. Code § 1430.2020 ("[a] registered public accountant shall not permit his name to be associated with financial statements . . . unless he has complied with applicable generally accepted auditing standards").

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions