United States: En Banc Court Concludes It Has Jurisdiction over Patent Infringement Determinations When Damages and Willfulness Remain Undecided

In Robert Bosch, LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp., Nos. 11-1363, -1364 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2013), (en banc), the Federal Circuit held that 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(2) confers jurisdiction on the Court to hear appeals from patent infringement liability determinations (1) when a trial on damages has not occurred, and (2) when willfulness issues are outstanding and remain undecided.

Robert Bosch, LLC ("Bosch") sued Pylon Manufacturing Corp. ("Pylon") for patent infringement, and Pylon later asserted patent infringement claims against Bosch.  On a motion by Pylon, the district court bifurcated the issues of liability and damages.  The district court also stayed discovery on damages and willfulness issues.  After a jury trial on liability and JMOL motions, the district court entered judgment on the liability issues.  Bosch appealed and Pylon cross-appealed.  Bosch filed a motion to dismiss its appeal and Pylon's cross-appeal on the ground that the Federal Circuit lacked jurisdiction.  The Court denied Bosch's motion and the parties presented both the substantive and jurisdictional issues before a panel of the Court.  After oral argument, the Court sua sponte granted a rehearing en banc to determine if the Court had jurisdiction over the appeal.

Under § 1292(c)(2), an appeal can be taken to the Federal Circuit from a judgment in a patent infringement action that is otherwise appealable except for an accounting.  The question before the en banc Court was whether a trial on damages and willfulness is an accounting for purposes of § 1292(c)(2).

The Court first concluded that "an accounting" includes the determination of damages, reasoning that it was clear from the case law and the history of the statute that an accounting includes both the determination of an infringer's profits as well as a patentee's damages.  The Court noted that in enacting 28 U.S.C. § 227a, the predecessor to § 1292(c)(2), Congress gave the term "accounting" its judicially settled meaning of proceedings before a special master to determine the infringer's profits and the plaintiff's damages.  The Court stated that "[t]he statute's interpretation through history is clear."  Slip op. at 13.  "An 'accounting' in the context of § 1292(c)(2) includes the determination of damages and cannot be limited to a traditional equitable accounting of an infringer's profits."  Id.

"It is clear from the case law and the history of the statute that an accounting includes both the determination of an infringer's profits as well as a patentee's damages."  Slip op. at 5.

"We also took this case en banc to determine whether § 1292(c)(2) confers jurisdiction on this court to entertain appeals from patent infringement liability determinations when willfulness issues are outstanding and remain undecided.  We hold now that it does."   Id. at 22.

The Court next concluded that an accounting may include a trial on damages, finding that neither the text nor the history of the statute supported Bosch's narrower interpretation to the contrary.  The Court based its conclusion on four points.  First, Congress expanded jurisdiction over interlocutory appeals from cases in equity to "civil actions for patent infringement which are final except for accounting."  Id.  Second, the issues historically decided in accounting proceedings are the same that are decided in modern damages trials.  Third, Congress's reasons for allowing interlocutory appellate jurisdiction over patent cases except for an accounting apply with equal force to a modern damages trial.  Fourth, stare decisis weighs in favor of allowing interlocutory appeals where liability has been established and a damages trial remains.

The Court further held that § 1292(c)(2) confers jurisdiction to entertain appeals from patent infringement liability determinations when willfulness issues are outstanding and remain undecided.  The Court noted that the authority of the district court to bifurcate willfulness and infringement issues and the related Seventh Amendment issues were immaterial to its inquiry.  Instead, the Court explained that the disposition of the issue turned on whether an "accounting" includes the determination of willfulness.  The Court held that it does, basing its decision on the statute itself and cases decided since the enactment of the statute's predecessor.  The Court stated that "it is clear that an accounting . . . included the determination of willfulness" and that it was "in no position to change that well settled meaning now."  Id.  at 26.

Judge Moore agreed with the majority's holding that the Court has interlocutory jurisdiction over judgments that are final except for determining damages, but disagreed that this includes jurisdiction over judgments when willful infringement remains outstanding.  According to Judge Moore, "[n]o reasonable construction of an 'accounting' can encompass the subjective state-of-mind and objective recklessness inquiries that underpin a willful infringement analysis."  Moore Concurrence-in-Part and Dissent-in-Part at 1-2.  Judge Moore opined that Congress made clear that an appeal can be had when all that is left is to ascertain the plaintiff's damages and determine the defendant's profits, and that this construction is consistent with the general understanding of the term "accounting."  Judge Moore disagreed with the majority's reliance on past cases, stating that none of the cases established that Congress understood an accounting to include the substantive determinations of knowledge, intent, and reasonableness, and further, that none of the cases held that a determination of willfulness is part of an accounting.  Judge Moore noted that many cases during the relevant time period gave the term "accounting" its plain and ordinary meaning—the determination of damages.  Judge Moore dissented-in-part as there was "no sound basis upon which to twist the statute and introduce such inefficiency into the judicial system."  Id.  at 6-7.

Judge Reyna also agreed with the majority that the Court has interlocutory jurisdiction over judgments that are final except for determining damages, but dissented from the majority's holding that an accounting includes determining willfulness for three reasons.  First, according to Judge Reyna, the plain language of § 1292(c)(2) makes no mention of willfulness and does not unambiguously express Congress's intent to exclude willfulness from the finality rule.  Second, Judge Reyna reasoned that an accounting bears no relation to the willfulness inquiry, which has little to do with damages and everything to do with liability for infringement.  Third, Judge Reyna opined that if § 1292(c)(2) is interpreted to allow an appeal before a determination of willfulness is made, Congress's purpose of avoiding needless expense wrought by piecemeal appeals in patent litigation will be frustrated.

Judge O'Malley dissented, joined by Judge Wallach, disagreeing with both of the majority's conclusions.  Judge O'Malley stated that she did not agree that the scope of the § 1292(c)(2) exception to the final judgment rule "has the astounding breadth the majority affords it today."  O'Malley Dissent at 1.  According to Judge O'Malley, the majority stretched the statutory provision beyond reasonable bounds, and well beyond anything Congress intended.  Judge O'Malley expressed that the appeal should be dismissed because it is a nonfinal judgment over which the Court has no jurisdiction.

According to the dissent, rather than interpreting § 1292(c)(2) narrowly to find limited exceptions to the final judgment rule applicable to all Article III courts, the majority grossly expanded the Court's jurisdictional reach by adopting a broad definition of "an accounting."  The dissent stated that the majority asked and answered the wrong question—whether an accounting in 1927, when § 227a was enacted, only permitted consideration of an infringer's profits or also allowed calculation of a patentee's damages.

The dissent opined that the Court instead should have asked whether the 1927 "accounting" proceeding as contemplated in § 1292(c)(2) was the same as or encompassed a jury trial on profits and damages.  Judge O'Malley did not find persuasive any of the majority's four reasons for concluding that an "accounting" includes a damages trial.

According to the dissent, the majority's conclusion that an accounting can include a willfulness determination "is even less defensible" than its conclusion that an accounting can include a damages trial.  Id. at 28.  The dissent disagreed with the majority's asking only whether the fact of willfulness was ever considered by special masters when assessing the appropriate measure of an award to a patent holder in a suit in equity, stating that it "is simply not the relevant inquiry."  Id.

Judges: Rader, Newman, Lourie, Dyk, Prost (author), Moore (concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part), O'Malley (dissenting), Reyna (concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part), Wallach (dissenting)

[Appealed from D. Del., Judge Robinson]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, July, 2013

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
17 Nov 2018, Conference, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan partner Clare Cornell will present “Covert Trademark Use in the Internet: Licit or Illicit” at the Asian Patent Attorneys Association Conference.

20 Nov 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

As part of Strafford Publications’ webinar series, Finnegan attorneys Tom Irving, Josh Goldberg, and Cory Bell will analyze Patent Trial and Appeal Board denials and partial denials, offering take-home lessons applicable in

21 Nov 2018, Workshop, London, UK

Finnegan partner Leythem Wall will consider European claim drafting strategy and lead the Chemical Workshop during a two-day course, hosted by Management Forum.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions