United States: Nortel/Lehman: A Balancing Act

The Supreme Court handed down its decision yesterday on the combined appeals of Nortel GmbH (In Administration) ("Nortel") and Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration) ("Lehman Brothers") (together, the "Appellants") against the Pensions Regulator ("tPR"). The Appellants asked the Supreme Court to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeal from October 2011, which held that the costs of complying with a financial support direction ("FSD") or contribution notice ("CN") issued by tPR were payable as an expense of administration.

Much to the relief of employers, creditors, lenders, and insolvency practitioners, the Supreme Court has found in favour of the Appellants holding that a company's liability arising pursuant to an FSD issued after the company has gone into administration, ranks as a provable debt of the company, and not as an expense of the administration.

This article provides a brief summary of the issues in the case and discusses the impact of the Supreme Court decision on companies, lenders and the restructuring community.


The financial support direction regime under the Pensions Act 2004

Under the Pensions Act 2004, tPR has power to issue an FSD requiring the recipient to put in place arrangements for the financial support of an underfunded defined benefit pension scheme. FSDs can be issued to scheme employers and to any parties connected or associated with an employer (provided certain conditions are met). The terms of an FSD can be broad and often include ensuring cash, guarantees or other security arrangements are put in place.

If a target company fails to comply with an FSD, tPR can issue a non-compliance CN requiring the recipient to pay specified sums of money into the pension scheme.

Treatment of pensions deficit on insolvency

The ordinary treatment of pension scheme deficits on insolvency of the employer company is dealt with by section 75 of the Pensions Act 1995, which stipulates that the deficit in the scheme is to be treated as a debt owed by the employer to the trustees and that the debt is to be treated as arising immediately before the onset of insolvency. The deficit for these purposes is calculated on the "buy-out" basis. As such, the debt is an ordinary unsecured debt. The only situation where such debt could potentially rank higher would be where specific contributions have been promised but remain unpaid at the date of insolvency.

The Appellants

When the Appellants went into administration they left behind UK pension schemes with deficits of £2.1bn and £130m respectively. In 2009 tPR initiated action against them in an attempt to protect scheme member benefits and to limit calls on the Pension Protection Fund ("PPF"). TPR's Determinations Panel decided that it would be reasonable to issue FSDs against numerous companies in their respective groups.

Administrators for the Appellants sought directions from the High Court on whether the liability under the FSD was:

a) a provable debt, that ranked as ordinary unsecured debt;

b) an expense of administration, with "super priority" ranking; or

c) of no effect whatsoever on insolvency, falling into a so-called "black hole".

High Court & Court of Appeal decisions

The High Court held that an FSD or CN issued following the commencement of administration proceedings was (b) above: an expense of the administration, having "super priority" over all unsecured creditor and floating charge holder claims, and ranking alongside other expenses of the administration.

The previous Court of Appeal cases of Glenister v Rowe (Costs) [2000] Ch. 76 and R (Steele) v Birmingham City Council [2005] EWCA Civ 1824 were followed, which held that, without a pre-existing legal obligation, a liability cannot be a contingent liability and therefore could not be a provable debt. The Court also felt particularly bound by the House of Lords decision in Re Toshoku Finance UK Plc (In Liquidation) Re [2002] UKHL 6, which established a general principle that where statute imposes financial liability which is not a provable debt, it will constitute a necessary disbursement of the administrator and rank as an expense.

Mr Justice Briggs was constrained by the governing legislation and case law, but made it clear that he believed the outcome was not what Parliament could have intended.

The Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the High Court's decision, whilst acknowledging the "oddities, anomalies and inconveniences" of it.

Supreme Court Decision: Not shackled by a consistent line of authority

The Supreme Court ruled that the liability under an FSD after the commencement of its administration or liquidation fell within Rule 13.12.(1)(b) of the Insolvency Rules 1986 as it was a liability under an enactment which arose by reason of an obligation incurred before the insolvency event. Therefore it is a provable debt of the company. In doing so it said that giving the liability under an FSD a status higher than that available to a section 75 debt (which is a provable debt) would be "somewhat surprising" but at the same time, it found it unlikely that legislation could have intended that such a liability rank behind provable debts, falling in the so-called "black hole".

The Court also provided some helpful guidance in this area. Lord Neuberger commented that "[t]he mere fact that an event occurs during the administration of a company which a statute provides gives rise to a debt on the part of the company cannot, of itself, be enough to render payment of the debt an expense of the administration". He added that where such a statutory liability does not fall in the provable debt category and the statute is silent as to how such a liability should rank, the liability can only be an expense of the liquidation or administration if the nature of the liability is such that it must reasonably have been the intention of the legislation for it to rank ahead of provable debts.

Comments and implications

The Supreme Court reversing the decision of the Court of Appeal allows restructuring professionals to breathe a sigh of relief, as they no longer need to fear the repercussions of having to take into account potentially large pension deficits when assessing the prospects of rescuing the business of companies on the verge of insolvency nor rely on the promises of tPR made in a statement of July 2012 that it would act "reasonably" when exercising its anti-avoidance powers. The decision will also be appreciated by employer companies, that would have found it harder to borrow funds, as lenders would have demanded more favourable terms or even refused funding, had the FSDs retained the "super priority" status. For that reason, there is also an upside for pension scheme trustees in the Supreme Court's decision since a reduced ability on the part of employers to secure financing and/or achieve beneficial restructurings could prejudice the employers' ability to fund their schemes in the long-term.

Last words

The insolvency profession, companies and lenders will welcome the Supreme Court decision as the balance is restored between ensuring companies satisfy their pension liabilities and meeting obligations to their creditors, without the need for Parliament to intervene. It is a return to the norm and bolsters the corporate rescue culture that modern insolvency law seeks to encourage, and that is arguably key to the turnaround of UK plc at this time.

Also much to be welcomed is the broad approach to the definition of contingent liabilities, which constitute provable debts that can be compromised through insolvency processes. There should now be more scope to rescue companies with latent statutory liabilities, such as environmental and health and safety liabilities. Restructuring professionals advising companies in these sectors with financial difficulties will be looking closely at the decision to see whether such liabilities will no longer be at risk of having "super priority" status.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2013. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions