United States: In Ledyard, 2nd Circuit Says Local Governments May Tax Non-Indian Personal Property Located On Indian Reservations

Decision Burdens Tribes, Reverses Comprehensive District Court Ruling

Zehava Zevit is an Attorney in our Los Angeles office and Kathleen M. Nilles is a Partner in our Washington, D.C. office.

Reversing a district court order that would have preempted the imposition of local taxes on personal property located on Indian reservations and utilized by an Indian tribe, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has held that the Town of Ledyard, Conn., can tax slot machines owned by non-Indian gaming machine companies and leased by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe. Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. Town of Ledyard , 12-1727-cv (L).

The court held that neither the federal Indian Trader Statutes nor the Indian Gaming regulatory Act (IGRA) expressly bar the imposition of a local property tax imposed on the non-Indian owners of personal property located on an Indian reservation. It further held that federal law does not implicitly bar the tax — even when the property is used for tribal operations — because state and town interests in applying the tax outweigh the federal and tribal interests reflected in federal statutes. The Ledyard decision burdens tribes by significantly diminishing the strength of their claimed interests in tax preemption cases.


The Mashantucket Pequot Tribe entered into equipment lease agreements with various gaming manufacturers, including Atlantic City Coin & Slot Co. and WMS Gaming, Inc. Each of the leases between the manufacturers and the tribe was negotiated and executed on the reservation, and each provided that the tribe would reimburse the manufacturer for any tax imposed on the leased equipment. The Town of Ledyard sought to impose its property tax on the equipment placed at the Mashantucket Pequot casino on tribal lands. The tribe filed an action in federal court against the defendant town and state challenging the property tax. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In a uniquely comprehensive  order issued March 27, 2012, Senior U.S. District Judge Warren W. Eginton (District of Connecticut) held that the Town of Ledyard could not tax the slot machines owned by non-Indian gaming machine companies and leased by plaintiff Mashantucket Pequot Tribe. (See our  April 2, 2012, alert about this ruling.) Last week, the 2nd Circuit reversed that order.

The Ruling

First, the 2nd Circuit held that the tribe had standing to pursue its claim. It then held that the federal Tax Injunction Act, which normally bars an individual's state tax challenge in federal court, does not apply to the tribe's action because the action touches upon an alleged encroachment upon aspects of tribal sovereignty protected by the Indian Trader Statutes and IGRA. The court also held that comity does not preclude federal jurisdiction.

The 2nd Circuit then moved to a detailed discussion of federal preemption of state taxes, concluding that neither the Indian Trader Statute nor IGRA preempts the tax expressly or by plain implication, and that the town and state interests in the tax, as applied to the vendors, outweigh the tribe and federal interests. The court concluded that the tax is not preempted.

The court first examined whether the Indian Trader Statutes, 25 U.S.C. §§261-264, preempt the imposition of Ledyard's tax. These statutes give the federal government exclusive authority to regulate non-Indians trading with Indians on reservations. Citing Dep't of Taxation and Fin. Of N.Y. v. Milelm Attea & Bros., Inc., 512 U.S. 61 (1994), the court held that the Indian Trader Statutes and their regulations do not wholly immunize Indian traders from state regulation that is reasonably necessary to the assessment or collection of lawful state taxes. Rather, preemption under the Indian Trader statutes involves a particularized inquiry into the nature of the state, federal and tribal interests at stake. In other words, the court held that where they are implicated, the Indian Trader Statutes require a balancing analysis similar to that articulated in White Mountain Apache v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980). The court further found that this is "particularly true" where the incidence of the tax falls on the non-Indian's ownership of property rather than on the transaction between the tribe and the non-Indian. Accordingly, the court held that the Indian Trader Statutes do not preempt Ledyard's personal property tax either expressly or by plain implication.

The opinion also held that the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act does not preempt the tax either explicitly or by implication. Citing various provisions in IGRA, it posited that nothing in the Act explicitly forbids the state to apply its personal property tax to the vendors. The 2nd Circuit also found that courts dealing with the question of whether a state tax imposed on a third party is preempted by IGRA's occupation of the field of Indian gaming have been "quick to dismiss challenges to generally-applicable laws with de minimis effects on a tribe's ability to regulate its gambling operations." Based on this observation, the court concluded that any preemption to the field of gaming regulations is not at issue here, where the state tax on property is not — in the court's view — targeted at gaming.

The court then turned to the Bracker balancing test. Bracker requires a balancing of federal and tribal interests against those of a state when a state attempts to assert of jurisdiction over on-reservation, non-Indian activity. The state action is preempted if it interferes with or is incompatible with federal and tribal interests as expressed in federal law, unless the state has interests sufficient to justify its jurisdiction. Acknowledging the federal government's regulation of Indian gaming, the court found that the federal interest in regulating such gaming focused on promoting tribal economic development, preventing criminal activity relating to gambling and ensuring that gaming activities are conducted fairly and concluded that the tax at issue is likely to have only a minimal effect on any of the federal interests articulated in IGRA. It further concluded that the tax would have a minimal effect on the tribe's economic interests and only a moderate effect on tribal sovereignty. In contrast, the court concluded that the town's interests would be heavily affected.

The court's analysis of the town's interests marks a departure from the analysis typically performed under Bracker to date. Specifically, the court held that the town's economic interests in the tax exceed the value of the taxes on slot machines insofar as a ruling favorable to the tribe could invite other non-Indian owners of personal property on the reservation to initiate similar actions. Further, the court held that the legality of the tax cannot hinge on the extent to which the taxed property is used by the tribe for its federally authorized gaming, because such a position would require the town to take careful account of the use to which property owned by non-Indians on the reservation was put, and this level of analysis would further frustrate the town's revenue collection and render the state's tax more difficult and expensive to administer. The court noted that the town provides educational services to tribal children, maintains roads to and on the reservation and provides generalized functions from which the tribe benefits. Finally, the court noted that the state has an interest in the uniform application of its tax code and a sovereign interest in being in control of, and able to apply, its laws throughout its territory. The court concluded that the town and state have more at stake than the tribe, and that the balance of equities favors the town and state.

Jurisprudential Significance of the Decision

This case recognized, and gave credence to, state and local interests that typically do not contribute to the Bracker interest-balancing test. Specifically, the court's willingness to consider potential future litigation costs as a legitimate component of the town's interest in taxation is a new development in the context of Bracker balancing that tips the scales in favor of state interests and against tribal interests. Similarly, the court's unwillingness to hold that an otherwise applicable property tax may be preempted based upon the manner of use of that property — even if federal law requires such an analysis — because it would be "difficult" for the state to conduct the requisite analysis, represents a highly questionable approach to preemption jurisprudence that burdens tribes. Finally, the court's opinion that state and local interests in the integrity and uniform application of their tax system suffice to outweigh federal and tribal interests is far broader than (and arguably inconsistent with) the opinions in prior case law. It is so broad, in fact, that it may render the entire Bracker balancing test superfluous in favor of states. Whether the 2nd Circuit's positions remain valid will depend on future judicial developments.

Practical Significance of the Decision

This case makes it easier for state and local governments to tax the on-reservation activities of Indian tribes by taxing the tribes' business partners. Tribes concerned about the imposition of state and local taxes on their governmental operations may want to consider the following issues:

  • Structuring. Tribes seeking to avoid payment of state and local tax should be mindful of this opinion in constructing their business relationships and on-reservation operations, and should structure their projects accordingly. For example, tribes may want to consider owning slot machines or other personal property rather than leasing them — particularly in states where the incidence of the property tax is deemed to fall on the owner. This will vary from state to state.
  • Analysis of tax exposure/liability. This case effectively challenges the Bracker balancing test's validity, skews its implementation and raises significant questions about Bracker's ability to protect tribal interests. If federal courts adopt the approach introduced in Ledyard and apply it in other situations, tribes relying on the Bracker test will be exposed to increased state and local tax liability. Tribes may want to analyze their exposure in anticipation of new challenges by states and local governments.
  • Need for a federal legislative solution. Because the Bracker analysis has proven to be so unreliable in slowing the rising tide of state taxation on Indian reservations, it may be time for Congress to seriously review the economic impact of state taxation on reservation economies and revisit the need for a federal legislative solution in this area.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions