United States: Valuing Forbearance In Fraudulent Transfer Actions: An Introduction*

Last Updated: July 24 2013
Article by James H. Millar

Co-written by Neil Steinkamp, Stout Risius Ross Inc.; New York

As a business descends into financial distress, it commonly enters into discussions with its creditors concerning a viable path forward. As part of those discussions, creditors often agree to forbear from pursuing collection remedies against the company or the collateral for a period. In return, the company may transfer money or property to the creditors or incur additional debt. If, in a subsequent bankruptcy proceeding, the estate representative sues a given creditor for a fraudulent transfer based on the receipt of the money or property or a fraudulent incurrence of the additional obligation, then the creditor may well defend by claiming that the forbearance provided "value" to the debtor. Perhaps in conjunction with other benefits received by the debtor, the creditor will argue that it gave "reasonably equivalent value" and thus may defeat the fraudulent-transfer action. In the resolution to that litigation, the creditor's liability may turn on whether and to what extent a court ascribes value to the forbearance.

Legal Introduction to the Value of Forbearance
Section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code—the constructive fraudulent-transfer section—states in relevant part that a trustee may avoid any transfer ... of an interest of the debtor in property, or any obligation ... incurred by the debtor, that was made or incurred on or within 2 years before the date of the filing of the petition, if the debtor voluntarily or involuntarily ... received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such transfer or obligation and ... was insolvent on the date that such transfer was made or such obligation was incurred, or became insolvent as a result of such transfer or obligation.[2]

Section 548(d)(2) defines "value" as "property, or satisfaction or securing of a present or antecedent debt of the debtor, but does not include an unperformed promise to furnish support to the debtor or to a relative of the debtor." In addition, "[v]alue has been defined as that which provides an economic benefit, either direct or indirect, to the debtor."[3] However, whether the value provided in a given case rises to the level of "reasonably equivalent value" requires a more searching inquiry. "There is no fixed mathematical formula for determining reasonably equivalent value; rather, the determination depends on all the facts of each case."[4]

Courts have routinely recognized that forbearance can comprise a component of reasonably equivalent value with respect to a fraudulent-transfer analysis.[5] Two relatively recent cases, however, show that courts at times reach a summary conclusion with respect to valuing forbearance without readily providing significant detail around the attendant calculations.[6]

In In re Positive Health Management Inc., the court found that the creditor's forbearance provided value to the debtor because it allowed the debtor "to engage in ongoing business operations to generate continued cash flow."[7] Likewise, the court in In re Propex found that the agreement to forbear and the relaxing of the covenants constituted reasonably equivalent value as a matter of law for an increase in interest rate.[8]

These decisions demonstrate that forbearance provides legitimate benefits to the debtor but they do not set forth any underlying calculations or methodology as to how the court concluded that the forbearance provided reasonably equivalent value compared to the challenged payment. Other courts may not be as willing to reach such conclusions without more quantitative analysis on the relative valuations.[9]

Financial Introduction to the Value of Forbearance
Greek orator Antiphon noted more than 2,000 years ago that "the most costly outlay is time."[10] Benjamin Franklin later transformed this into its common form when he wrote "[r]emember that time is money. He that idly loses five shillings' worth of time loses five shillings, and might as prudently throw five shillings into the sea."[11] Indeed, perhaps in no time in history has the adage "time is money" been more true than today.

However, if time is money, can the two be equated mathematically? Fundamental to valuation theory is the concept that an asset's value must incorporate the risks inherent from the passage of time. Value is generally the present value of expected future cash flows. To arrive at that present value, one must apply reasonable financial theory to compensate for the passage of time and the expectation that there is risk in the outcomes that may be achieved in the future.

In the context of distressed businesses, there are often strategic risks that are faced and critical decision points. The results of these decisions may result in businesses surviving or failing. The efforts to restructure a business can involve many parties working together to preserve what value may exist in the business or can be realized from its liquidation or sale. For lenders, one common consideration is forbearance, which is simply defined as "a refraining from the enforcement of something (as a debt, right or obligation) that is due."[12] However, conceptually, if the lender provides a business with forbearance, it must receive something in exchange of reasonably equivalent value, which raises the following question: What is the value of forbearance? From the debtor's perspective, one could ponder "what would a buyer pay for this option in the market" or "what would the company pay to secure this option."[13] Of course, the answer involves a complex analysis of specific facts and circumstances. A complete review of the methods utilized and information considered for such an analysis is certainly beyond the scope of this article. However, certain concepts and calculations are worth considering.

One of the complexities in determining the value of forbearance is that one must consider several perspectives and several potential outcomes. Put simply, the value of forbearance could be conceptualized as the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows if forbearance is provided and the same in the circumstance where forbearance is not provided. One could certainly interpret the opinions of the courts in In re Positive Health Management Inc. and In re Propex Inc. as reflective of this perspective. While the courts did not offer a mathematical or financial method to determine this value, they suggested that had the forbearance not been extended, the circumstances would have been very different, suggesting that value could be measured by the difference. For these situations, valuation techniques can be employed that consider the decision-tree of reasonable outcomes, which are techniques that can be employed in various circumstances, each having certain similarities:

  • real options;[14]
  • valuation of claims arising out of litigation; and
  • valuation of contingent assets/liabilities.

For each of these, the valuation practitioner typically considers certain assumptions or inputs to the calculation of value. While the specifics of each methodology may include or exclude certain factors, generally, the practitioner considers the following:

  • the different events that are likely to occur under certain scenarios;
  • the time that it will take for these scenarios to develop;
  • the probability of the expected outcomes in each scenario;
  • the cash flow associated with each of the potential outcomes; and
  • the risks associated with the receipts of those cash flows.

The facts and circumstances often surrounding forbearance naturally lead to the use of the decision-tree valuation techniques due to the multiple potential outcomes and restructuring events that may arise with or without forbearance.

The first step in developing an analysis using decision-tree valuation techniques typically involves estimating the amounts and timing of the future cash flows estimated under multiple scenarios. These amounts are discounted to a present value utilizing a rate of return consistent with the risk inherent in the projected cash flows. The present value of the total cash flows in each scenario is then weighted based on the probability of each scenario occurring, as projected.[15]

The decision-tree framework provides for flexibility that is not typically found in the discounted cash flow method. However, decision-tree valuation techniques can also require additional assumptions that can be challenging to quantify. In addition, there are practical limitations to the number of possible scenarios that can either be modeled or reasonably estimated. As such, one must carefully weigh the benefits of additional flexibility with the challenges and complexity of the resultant financial models.

Courts have made it clear that forbearance has value. Further, they have stated that forbearance is an element of consideration when reviewing reasonably equivalent value for purposes of fraudulent transfers, and the published opinions have provided little guidance as to the specific factors considered in valuing forbearance or specific methods that are to be applied. However, the essential characteristics of forbearance are similar to other circumstances in which valuation theory is commonly applied. In these circumstances, such as the valuation of claims arising out of litigation (often considered a contingent asset or liability), decision-tree valuation methodologies are employed to assess the value of assets based on the probabilities, cash flows and risks of cash flows associated with certain expected outcomes. This analysis is certainly complex and requires a careful analysis of available facts in any matter, however, the value of forbearance can be determined if sensible inputs are applied reasonably.

* The authors provided a lengthier treatment of this subject in the Dec. 3, 2012, edition of the New York Law Journal.

2. 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(1)(B) (emphasis added).

3. Barber v. Iverson (In re Iverson), 2008 WL 2796998, at *5 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. July 21, 2008) (citing Lisle v. John Wiley & Sons Inc. (In re Wilkinson), 319 B.R. 134, 138 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2004), aff'd, 196 Fed. Appx. 337, 2006 WL 2380887 (6th Cir. 2006)).

4. First State Bank of Red Bud v. Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors (In re Schaefer), 2011 WL 1118666, at *4 (S.D. Ill. March 28, 2011) (citing Barber v. Golden Seed Co., 129 F.3d 382, 387 (7th Cir. 1997)).

5. See, e.g., In re Schaefer, 2011 WL 1118666, at *5. See also Geron v. Palladin Overseas Fund Ltd. (In re AppliedTheory Corp.), 330 B.R. 362, 363-64 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (discussing Cuevas v. Hudson United Bank (In re M. Silverman Laces Inc.), 2002 WL 31412465 (S.D.N.Y. Oct 24, 2002), and holding that forbearance plus the transfer of a lien equates to reasonably equivalent value as a matter of law with respect to a creditor that provided a cash loan and reasoning that the fact-based analysis used by other courts in similar circumstances is unnecessary).

6. Williams v. BBVA Compass Bank (In re Positive Health Mgmt. Inc.), 2012 WL 3929900 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 7, 2012); Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Propex Inc. v. BNP Paribas (In re Propex Inc.), 415 B.R. 321 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009).

7. In re Positive Health Mgmt. Inc., 2012 WL 3929900, at *3.

8. In re Propex Inc., 415 B.R. 321 at 324.

9. See, e.g., Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Credit Suisse First Boston (In re Exide Techs. Inc.), 299 B.R. 732, 748 (Bankr. D. Del. 2003) (denying motion to dismiss and stating that "[t]he value of the forbearance may constitute reasonably equivalent value, but only based on a showing of what the value of the forbearance was"); see also Stillwater Nat'l Bank and Trust Co. v. Kirtley, 299 B.R. 626, 638 n.50 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2003) (stating with respect to forbearance that "[i]ndirect benefits that cannot be quantified do not constitute value").

11. Benjamin Franklin, The autobiography and essays of Dr. Benjamin Franklin (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Co., 1864), page 131

12. "Forbearance," Merriam-Webster, Merriam-Webster.com (Nov. 16, 2012).

13. The value of this forbearance may be perceived differently by the creditor and debtor, depending on the circumstances.

14. This includes decisions such as expanding geographically, investing in a new manufacturing line or laying off employees to achieve greater capacity.

15. See generally Tom Copeland, Vladimir Antikarov, Real Options—A Practitioner's Guide (New York: Cengage Learning, 2003); Steven Kam, Annika Reinemann, Caroline Puiggali and Jason Ruiz, "The Valuation of Litigation," Valuation Strategies 2-11 (March/April 2006).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

James H. Millar
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions