United States: Solar Project Prevails Over Williamson Act, CEQA Claims in Save Panoche Valley

A recent California appellate decision broke new ground for solar energy developers by upholding a County's decision to cancel numerous Williamson Act contracts and approve a large solar project despite potentially significant impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In Save Panoche Valley v. County of San Benito, the Sixth District Court of Appeal found that the County's decision to approve a 399 MW photovoltaic solar project was supported by substantial evidence under both the Williamson Act and CEQA. The first-of-its kind published decision may have important implications for similar projects by affirming that California's interest in promoting renewable energy may outweigh interests in protecting other resources.

The Williamson Act Challenge

The state's Williamson Act (Government Code section 51200 et seq.) allows agricultural landowners to enter into contracts with local government agencies that require the land to be used for agricultural or related purposes for at least ten years, in exchange for reduced property tax assessments. Once entered, a contract can only be terminated in specific circumstances. One option is to seek cancellation by the local agency, which may only occur if the cancellation is found to be consistent with the Williamson Act, or in the public interest, on the basis of specific findings.

As renewable energy developers are increasingly aware, the Williamson Act often acts as a high hurdle to utilize agricultural lands for energy projects, even where the land currently has limited agricultural value. Save Panoche Valley represents just the latest effort for the courts and public agencies to balance protection of agricultural resources against the state's demand for aggressive development of renewable energy sources. For example, in 2011, the Legislature enacted SB 618 (Wolk) in an attempt to expand the potential for siting solar facilities on unproductive land subject to Williamson Act contracts. The legislation allows a contract to be rescinded in favor of a "solar-use easement," subject to certain conditions. However, the requirement that eligible lands must have "significantly reduced agricultural productivity" and other criteria mean that the "solar-use easement" option is available only on a narrow set of contracted lands.

Save Panoche Valley Litigation

In 2009, Solargen Energy proposed an ambitious photovoltaic solar project on approximately 4,900 acres in rural San Benito County, on land primarily used for cattle grazing. Initially, Solargen requested that the County find the project compatible with the Williamson Act, which the County's Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee (APAC) denied. (The California Department of Conservation, which administers the Williamson Act on a statewide level, has consistently taken a position that utility-scale solar projects are not eligible for compatibility findings). Next, Solargen requested cancellation of contracts on approximately 7,000 acres, 4,500 of which were within the project site. The County's APAC recommended denial of the cancellation. However, in October 2010, the County approved the contract cancellations and a conditional use permit for the project, after certifying the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project and adopting a statement of overriding considerations under CEQA.

Three organizations (Save Panoche Valley, the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, and the Sierra Club) sued to stop the project, alleging violations of the Williamson Act and CEQA.

Williamson Act Claims Rejected: With respect to the Williamson Act cancellation, the project opponents argued that the County erred in its findings—required for cancellation—that (1) other public concerns substantially outweigh the objectives of the Williamson Act, and (2) there is no proximate, non-contracted land that would be available and suitable for a large-scale solar facility. The Court of Appeal rejected both arguments.

  • Other Public Concerns: First, the Court found that there was "substantial evidence in the record to support the County's determination that the public's interest in renewable energy outweighed the purpose of the Williamson Act." Specifically, the record contained substantial evidence that the project would help further the state's efforts to increase renewable energy supply and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The Court also looked at the small percentage of contracted land the site represented in both the county and state and the fact that Solargen committed to removing the panels after termination of the project. Ultimately, the Court declined to weigh the "pros and cons of cancelling the Williamson Act contracts"—it held that its inquiry ended when it found substantial evidence to support the County's conclusion, which it did. While there has been uncertainty regarding whether statewide policies to increase renewable energy provide adequate evidence to support the "other public concerns" prong of the cancellation finding, this aspect of the decision appears to confirm that they do.
  • Proximate Non-Contracted Land: The Court also found substantial evidence in the record to support the County's determination that no proximate, non-contracted land existed that was both available and suitable for the project. The project's opponents pointed to an alternative location that they claimed would be suitable—but, notably, the site was over 60 miles away, which the Court concluded did not qualify as "proximate." Additionally, the site was located across two counties, encumbered by several Williamson Act contracts itself, and Solargen had been unable to come to an agreement with the landowner about use of the site.

CEQA Claims Rejected: The project's opponents raised a number of CEQA claims, particularly relating to agricultural and biological impacts. The Court rejected these claims across the board, and reached several significant findings in the process.

  • Agricultural Impacts: The suit challenged the EIR's treatment of agricultural impacts, despite the fact that the project would preserve certain agricultural lands in and around the project site, remove the solar facilities and restore the site at the end of the project's life, and provide approximately 4,500 acres of rangeland or 285 acres of high quality cropland as compensatory mitigation through conservation easements. The Court rejected the petitioners' assertion that this was inadequate simply because it would not create additional agricultural lands, finding that "[t]he goal of mitigation measures is not to net out the impact of a proposed project, but to reduce the impact to insignificant levels."
  • Biological Impacts: During the public comment period on the EIR, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) submitted a comment letter asserting that the project had the potential to result in unlawful "take" of certain sensitive species, including the blunt-nosed leopard lizard, and recommended certain surveying and avoidance measures for the project. The FEIR incorporated several mitigation measures that apparently responded to CDFW's concerns. While the lawsuit alleged the EIR's impact analysis and mitigation measures were inadequate, the Court rejected each of these assertions and made a number of notable findings:
    • Although CDFW had raised concerns about "take" and the need for species surveys in its comment letter, the County was "not required to conduct all possible tests or exhaust all research methodologies to evaluate impacts," as the County's analysis was supported by substantial evidence.
    • The County's decision to include a mitigation measure requiring pre-construction surveys for protected species did not constitute improper deferral of mitigation because the measure included specific measures to be implemented based on the results of the survey, which were not "loose or open-ended."
    • To support their position regarding the inadequacy of mitigation measures, the opponents could not simply rely upon positions taken by CDFW that were contrary to the County's conclusions—rather, they needed to specify what evidence the County relied upon in reaching its conclusions and to show that this evidence could not support the County's findings.
    • The County's decision to identify specific lands for off-site biological mitigation, and its decision to adopt specific mitigation ratios for habitat impacts, were supported by substantial evidence. The Court reiterated a recent appellate court's statement, in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach, that "mitigation need not account for every square foot of impacted habitat to be adequate. What matters is that the unmitigated impact is no longer significant." While the opponents may have differing views about the adequacy of mitigation, they were not able to overcome the deferential "substantial evidence" standard of review.

Forecast Sunny For Solar?

As the state continues to work toward achieving its ambitious greenhouse gas reduction and renewable energy goals, conflicts between these goals and resource protection policies will continue to surface, and local governments will need to balance these potentially competing interests based on each project's unique facts. But Save Panoche Valley sends a strong signal that the existence of Williamson Act contracts or other important resources on a site are not necessarily a prohibitive barrier to renewable energy development, so long as the agency's determinations are carefully reasoned on the basis of substantial evidence.

The case is Save Panoche Valley v. County of San Benito, __ Cal. App. 4th ___, Court of Appeal Case No. H037599 (filed June 25, 2013).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions