United States: Special Purpose Entities: What Recourse Does A Lender Have When Spes Are Consolidated Pre-Bankruptcy? … Maybe None

Last Updated: July 4 2013
Article by Vicki Harding

Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n v. Bruckner , 489 B.R. 93 (E.D. Wis. 2012) –

The debtor (Buckner) owned 36 rental projects (containing ~ 1300 rental units) through various limited liability companies.  The LLCs transferred all of the properties to Buckner a few days before he filed a chapter 11 bankruptcy.  Fannie Mae, which held mortgages on three of the properties, contended that these transfers were improper.  Consequently, it argued that it was entitled to some form of relief, such as  relief from the automatic stay, dismissal of the bankruptcy case, or a ruling that the properties subject to its mortgages were not property of the debtor's estate.  The bankruptcy court denied the requested relief, and Fannie Mae appealed to the district court.

One of Bruckner's largest projects had been flooded by heavy rains that affected the building foundations, which in turn required the evacuation of tenants.  The costs and lost income from this disaster had a cascade effect on his ability to meet obligations for other properties.  After he fell behind on mortgage payments, several lenders began foreclosure proceedings.  At that point Bruckner came up with the strategy of consolidating ownership of the projects and filing bankruptcy.

Presumably Bruckner held title to the individual projects through separate limited liability companies because he was required to do so by his lenders.  Typically a real estate lender will insist on a structure that facilitates a bankruptcy remote entity that will not be subject to substantive consolidation with other entities.  Requiring that separate entities own each project helps isolate claims and reduces the likelihood that there will be an involuntary bankruptcy affecting a particular project.  Not surprisingly, Fannie Mae strongly objected to the pre-bankruptcy consolidation of ownership so that its claims and collateral were mixed in with a number of other projects and claims.

Fannie Mae tried various legal theories.  First, it contended that Bruckner obtained the properties by fraud.  Various cases have held that property acquired through fraud does not constitute property of the estate.  The theory is that creditors should not benefit from a debtor's fraud at the expense of those who were defrauded.

In particular, Fannie Mae argued that the transfers of properties from the LLCs to Buckner were fraudulent conveyances under state law.  The court questioned whether this would be sufficient since the rule appears to contemplate actual fraud, as opposed to deemed or constructive fraud.  However, the court did not need to reach that issue since Fannie Mae did not establish that the transfers constituted fraudulent conveyances.

The constructive fraud provisions relied on by Fannie Mae required a showing that (1) the LLC did not receive "reasonably equivalent value" for its transfer, and (2) it was left with unreasonably small capital or had an intent to incur debts beyond its ability to pay.   In connection with an LLC's transfer of property to Bruckner, he assumed all of the LLC's liabilities.  There was no attempt to show that this was not reasonably equivalent value.  (Nor did Fannie Mae make any showing that the LLC was left with unreasonably small capital or intended to incur debts beyond its ability to pay.)  So, there was no basis for finding that Bruckner obtained the properties through fraud, whether actual or constructive.

Fannie Mae's second argument was that it was entitled to relief from the automatic stay under Section 362(d)(4), which provides for relief to a creditor secured by real property:

[I]f the court finds that the bankruptcy filing was part of a scheme to delay, hinder, or defraud creditors that involved either –

(A)    transfer of all or part ownership of, or other interest in, such real property without the consent of the secured creditor or court approval; or

(B)    multiple bankruptcy filings affecting such real property.

The bankruptcy court found that the debtor's intent was to proceed with a plan of reorganization in good faith.  Each of the separate LLCs could have filed separate bankruptcy petitions.  However, this would have been costly and duplicative.  The court concluded that Buckner's motive in transferring the properties to himself was to be able to file a single chapter 11 proceeding.

On review, the district court concluded that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in making these findings.  While acknowledging that Fannie Mae might prefer to deal with three separate bankruptcies rather than a global proceeding involving many creditors, the district court did not believe that the consolidation necessarily was a scheme to delay, hinder or defraud creditors.

In yet another argument, Fannie Mae argued that the case was not filed in good faith, and thus should be dismissed.  In particular, it suggested that the "new debtor syndrome" was applicable.  The typical fact pattern for the new debtor syndrome is that a person (1) creates a new entity, (2) transfers property subject to a pending foreclosure to the new entity, and (3) then causes the new entity to file bankruptcy.  This allows the person to delay the foreclosure without exposing the rest of its assets to bankruptcy creditors.  Courts often conclude that these actions constitute bad faith.  However, it is not per se bad faith, and in any event the facts in this case do not fit the fact pattern.  Bruckner's purpose was not to keep assets out of bankruptcy, but rather to subject all of the assets of all of the LLCs to the same bankruptcy.  Again, the district court did not find an abuse of discretion by the bankruptcy court.

It is likely that Bruckner guaranteed most if not all of the project loans.  Although the guarantees could have been full recourse guarantees to begin with, it is more likely that they were "bad boy" guarantees, with full recourse liability triggered by certain events such, as a bankruptcy filing by an LLC borrower.  A bad boy guarantee can be a very effective disincentive for filing bankruptcy, if filing triggers liability for the full debt.

Bruckner's strategy of transferring all of the assets to himself and then assuming all liabilities means that triggering full recourse under guarantees would no longer be a relevant consideration.  Bruckner's strategy of transferring the assets pre-bankruptcy allowed him to control consolidation of assets and creditors (as opposed to being at the mercy of a judicial determination of whether substantive consolidation was justified).  This case illustrates that if a deep pocket guarantor is willing to go into bankruptcy itself, all of the planning to structure isolated bankruptcy remote projects may be for nothing.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Vicki Harding
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions