United States: United States Supreme Court Enforces Class Arbitration Waiver In A Commercial Agreement

Last week, in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, No. 12-133 (June 20, 2013), the United States Supreme Court held that an arbitration provision in a commercial agreement prohibiting the parties from arbitrating matters on a class-wide basis was enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) even if the cost of arbitrating individual claims was economically prohibitive.  American Express is the latest in a series of Supreme Court decisions holding that the terms of an arbitration agreement must be strictly enforced.  The Court's opinion is likely to embolden employers who seek to avoid class and collective actions by requiring employees to arbitrate employment disputes.


Since 1999, American Express has had a mandatory provision in its contracts with merchants that requires disputes between the merchant and American Express to be submitted to arbitration.  The arbitration provision at issue states that "[t]here shall be no right or authority for any Claims to be arbitrated on a class action basis."  Believing that American Express was using its market power to increase rates that it charged merchants, a group of businesses filed a class action complaint in federal court in New York claiming that American Express was violating federal antitrust laws. 

American Express moved to compel arbitration of the dispute pursuant to the merchant agreement it had with each of the plaintiff-merchants.  The merchants opposed American Express' motion by arguing that the arbitration agreement prohibited class-wide arbitration and that the cost to pursue claims on an individual basis, as compared to the limited amount of potential damages that are available to any individual merchant, was so high that it was not feasible to pursue the claims.  Specifically, the plaintiffs submitted a declaration from an economist who estimated that in order to prove the antitrust claims, plaintiffs would have to have an expert conduct an analysis, which would be at least several hundred thousand dollars; the maximum that each individual plaintiff could recover was under $40,000.  The district court granted American Express' motion and compelled arbitration.  Plaintiffs appealed to the Second Circuit.

The Second Circuit reversed the district court holding that the prohibition on class arbitration in the agreement was unenforceable because plaintiffs "would incur prohibitive costs if compelled to arbitrate under the class action waiver."  Indeed the Second Circuit noted that if it were to enforce the class action waiver it "would grant [American Express] de facto immunity from antitrust liability by removing the plaintiffs' only reasonably feasible means of recovery."  American Express then petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case.

After a series of procedural moves in which the Supreme Court asked the Second Circuit to review its decision in light of intervening Supreme Court decisions concerning arbitration, the Supreme Court granted American Express' petition.  The Supreme Court agreed to hear and decide the issue of "whether the [FAA] permits courts . . . to invalidate arbitration agreements on the ground that they do not permit class arbitration of a federal-law claim."

The Supreme Court's Decision

Writing for a 5-3 majority (Justice Sotomayor had recused herself), Justice Scalia rejected the assertion that requiring the merchants to arbitrate their claims individually would "contravene the policies of the antitrust laws."  Justice Scalia noted that absent "congressional command" to the contrary, the FAA requires that courts enforce the terms of an arbitration agreement as they have been written. 

Next, the Court considered the merchants' claim that the class action waiver prevents them from vindicating their rights because they would have no economic incentive to do so due to the high litigation costs.  The Court rejected this argument as well holding that the litigation costs do not prevent the merchants from pursuing their claims; rather the class action waiver only inhibits the merchants' ability to prove a statutory remedy.  As Justice Scalia wrote "the fact that it is not worth the expense involved in proving a statutory remedy does not constitute the elimination of the right to pursue the remedy" (emphasis in original).  According to the Court, this difference was critical.  If American Express' arbitration agreement had prevented the merchants from asserting certain statutory rights, the agreement might not be enforceable.  However, the arbitration agreement did no such thing.  It did not prohibit or prevent the merchants from bringing any claims that they had against American Express; rather, it only required the parties to bring those claims individually and in arbitration.  Accordingly, the Court reversed the Second Circuit decision.

Practical Implications

American Express is a strong statement by the Court in favor of mandatory arbitration provisions and class action waivers in the business sector. Although American Express is not an employment case, it should still have profound implications for employers as well.  The Court's decision clearly states that arbitration agreements that prohibit class-wide arbitration are enforceable even if the cost of pursing individual claims is so high that it would not be economically feasible for an individual to do so.  Under AmericanExpress and earlier Supreme Court decisions such as Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp., 559 U.S. 662 (2010) and AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. __ (2011), employers should be confident that the Court will likely enforce agreements that require employees (and former employees) to arbitrate discrimination and state wage and hour claims on an individual basis.  However, it should be noted that currently before the California Supreme Court is a case addressing whether such agreements are valid under California law, which has historically been hostile to employment-based arbitration agreements notwithstanding pronouncements made by the United States Supreme Court in Stolt-Nielsen, AT&T Mobility, and other cases.

The impact on claims brought by aggrieved individuals under statutes such as the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is less certain, however.  The right to pursue claims on a class-wide basis under most statutes stems from Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or its analogous state law provision. However, under the FLSA, the right to pursue claims on a collective basis comes directly from the statute itself.  As such, if an arbitration agreement requires individuals to pursue claims on an individual basis (thus prohibiting class-wide or collective arbitrations) a few courts may find that by preventing employees from arbitrating their claims on a collective basis the agreement prevents individuals from vindicating their substantive statutory rights under the FLSA. While virtually all courts that have addressed this argument have rejected it and compelled arbitration on an individual basis, it will likely require another Supreme Court decision before employers will know with certainty whether all state and federal courts will enforce arbitration agreements that prohibit collective actions.

Finally, the impact of American Express on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision in D.R. Horton, 357 NLRB No. 184 (2012) is also less certain. In D.R. Horton, the NLRB held that an arbitration agreement prohibiting class actions violated the National Labor Relations Act (the Act) because it prevented employees from engaging in concerted activity for their mutual aid and protection. The case is currently on appeal to the Fifth Circuit and most practitioners believe that the Fifth Circuit will overrule the NLRB and hold that arbitration agreements containing class action waivers do not violate the Act. Indeed, after American Express, the vitality of D.R. Horton is certainly questionable as there is nothing in the Act that creates an exception for arbitration agreements or supersedes the FAA. However, the NLRB has been known to disregard decisions of Circuit Courts.  Therefore, as with the FLSA, until the Supreme Court directly addresses the issue, it is likely that the NLRB will continue to find that arbitration agreements that prohibit class or collective actions violate the Act notwithstanding the strong language in American Express that should lead to a contrary result. It is also possible that other administrative agencies like the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission could avoid the issue of class action waivers contained in individual arbitration agreements by bringing suit in the name of the agency rather than an individual employee. Therefore, we can expect that class action waivers may ultimately wind up before Congress.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions