United States: Settlement Brings Long-Running Total FCPA Matter To Closure In The US

Last Updated: June 12 2013
Article by Lucinda Low, Brittany Prelogar and Richard J. Battaglia

After an almost 10-year investigation, on May 29, 2013, Total, S.A., the French petroleum company, entered into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the US Department of Justice (DoJ) and agreed to pay a monetary penalty of $245.2 million to settle charges that it violated the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in connection with approximately $60 million in payments made through intermediaries to an Iranian government official to improperly obtain rights to petroleum concessions in Iran.1 On the same day, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a cease-and-desist order against Total pursuant to which Total agreed to pay an additional $153 million in disgorgement of profits and prejudgment interest relating to the same conduct.2 Both the DOJ and SEC relied on Total S.A.'s status as an "issuer," based on ADRs traded on the New York Stock Exchange, to assert FCPA jurisdiction over the French company. In addition to the monetary penalties, totaling $398.2 million, Total agreed to retain an independent corporate compliance monitor for three years and to continue to implement an enhanced compliance program and internal controls designed to prevent and detect any violations of the FCPA.

On the same day, in France the Paris prosecutor announced his recommendation that Total and its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer be referred to the criminal courts in France for alleged violations of French law, including France's anti-bribery laws, and for alleged misuse of company funds.3 The simultaneous US and French announcements in the Total matter resulted from the first coordinated action by French and US law enforcement authorities on a major foreign bribery case.4

In the DoJ case, the US government charged Total with one count of conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA; one count of violating the internal accounting control provisions of the FCPA; and one count of violating the books and records provisions of the FCPA. These charges arose from the manner in which Total acquired petroleum concessions in Iran relating to the Sirri A and E oil and gas fields and the South Pars gas field, which is one of the world's largest gas fields, as well as Total's alleged mischaracterization of the bribe payments to the intermediaries as business development expenses and its failure to implement effective internal accounting controls, including anti-bribery compliance policies and procedures.

In respect of the Sirri A and E fields, Total was charged with making improper payments of approximately $16 million to an intermediary in Switzerland fronting for a senior Iranian government official under a purported consulting agreement in order to induce the official to use his influence to secure the petroleum concession rights from the National Iranian Oil Company. With respect to the South Pars gas field, Total was charged with making unlawful payments totaling approximately $44 million to the same Iranian official through another intermediary in the British Virgin Islands pursuant to a second purported consulting agreement. In 1997, Total was successful in obtaining a 40 percent interest in developing phases two and three of the South Pars gas field. Total's interest in the South Pars field was the subject of the controversial Section 9-(c) "national interest" waiver by the Clinton administration of sanctions under the Iran Libya Sanctions Act in May of 1998.

Thus, according to the Information filed by the DoJ, for a period of about 9 years between 1995 and 2004, Total made payments to intermediaries at the direction of the Iranian official totaling about $60 million for the purpose of improperly inducing the Iranian government official to use his influence in connection with Total's acquisition of petroleum rights in the Sirri A and E and the South Pars fields. DoJ's use of a conspiracy theory allowed it to reach conduct extending back to 1995, far beyond the FCPA's five-year statute of limitations, and was likely coupled with a tolling agreement during the investigation period, since the last overt act allegedly occurred in November 2004.

This is not the first time a European-based petroleum company has been charged with violating the FCPA as a result of alleged bribery of an Iranian government official in connection with acquiring petroleum rights in the South Pars gas field in Iran. In 2006, the DoJ and SEC announced FCPA enforcement settlements with Statoil who, according to the stipulated facts, made payments in 2002 and 2003 totaling $5.2 million to an offshore intermediary with ties to an Iranian official who was the head of the Iranian Fuel Consumption Optimizing Organization and an advisor to the Iranian Minister of Oil in order to induce the official to help Statoil obtain an interest in the South Pars field. The DoJ charged Statoil with violations of the anti-bribery and books and records provisions of the FCPA, and the SEC alleged that Statoil violated the anti-bribery provisions and the accounting provisions of the FCPA.

The Total case is the first in a few years with penalties exceeding $100 million. It also illustrates that the US DoJ and SEC are continuing to pursue enforcement actions against foreign issuers of securities in the United States;5 that the use of business development consultants and other agents and intermediaries continues to be a high-risk area for companies operating internationally; that employees of state-owned or -controlled oil companies are deemed foreign officials covered by the FCPA; that DoJ and SEC require implementation of a state-of-the-art anti-bribery compliance program; and that regulatory agencies of foreign countries are increasingly cooperating with the DoJ and SEC to investigate and prosecute violations of the FCPA and foreign anti-bribery laws.

From an anti-bribery corporate compliance program perspective, some interesting, if not surprising, lessons can be derived from the Information and DPA entered into by Total. When read in conjunction with the "Hallmarks of Effective Compliance Programs" section of the DoJ/SEC Resource Guide to the FCPA, these documents shed light on the components of an FCPA compliance program that US authorities expect major companies in the extractive sector (and perhaps even a broader universe of companies) to have in place.

Count 3 of the Information, "FCPA – Internal Controls" alleges that Total failed to implement a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that transactions and dispositions of Total's assets complied with the FCPA and other laws. Count 3 goes on to list specific examples of the alleged failures. While the amalgamation of compliance standards with internal accounting controls is not new, the alleged "failures" listed in Count 3 take certain known elements to new levels of specificity. They are:

  1. failure to implement adequate anti-bribery compliance policies and procedures;
  2. failure to maintain an adequate system for the selection and approval of consultants;
  3. failure to conduct adequate audits of payments to consultants;
  4. failure to establish a sufficiently empowered and competent corporate compliance office;
  5. failure to take reasonable steps to ensure the company's compliance and ethics program was followed;
  6. failure to evaluate regularly the effectiveness of the company's compliance and ethics program;
  7. failure to provide appropriate incentives to perform in accordance with the compliance and ethics program;
  8. concealment of the consulting agreements' true nature and participants;
  9. failure to perform due diligence concerning the parties to the consulting agreements; and
  10. lack of controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that the consulting agreements complied with applicable laws.

Attachment C to the DPA contains a list of what the DoJ considers to be the minimum elements of an FCPA corporate compliance program.

While Attachment C is similar to the lists contained in prior DPAs, the list in Count 3 takes the expectations to a new level. Indeed, by identifying the above listed elements of an internal controls program as items that Total should have had in place, the DOJ in effect says they are required. It is not clear at this point whether DoJ will apply these standards in all cases, but it is notable that Total appears to have been held to compliance standards that, in some instances, have been formulated after the conduct in question.

The settlement's corporate monitorship provisions are also noteworthy in continuing a trend toward increasing deference by US authorities to foreign monitors, laws, and enforcement authorities. As in the Technip and Alcatel-Lucent settlements, for example, Total is permitted to retain a French national as the monitor, to be selected by DoJ from a pool of candidates put forward by the company.6 Further, the agreement also contemplates involvement by French authorities where conflicts arise between the monitorship's disclosure and reporting requirements, on the one hand, and various provisions of French law, including the Blocking Statute and various labor and data privacy laws, on the other.


1 United States of America v. Total, S.A. (Crim. No. 1:13 CR 239, E.D. Va.).

2 In the Matter of Total, S.A., Securities Exch. Act of 1934 Rel. No. 69654 , May 29, 2013; Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Rel. No. 3461, May 29, 2013; Adm. Proc. File No. 3-15338 (Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order).

3 Geraldine Amiel and Joe Palazzolo, Prosecutor Recommends Corruption Trial for Total, CEO, Wall Street J., May 29, 2013.

4 DoJ Press Release, http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/May/13-crm-613.html.

5 Indeed, Total rises to number three on the list of the "top ten" largest FCPA settlements, nine of which involve non-US companies. http://www.fcpablog.com/blog/2013/5/29/frances-total-sa-cracks-our-top-10-list.html

6 See our prior advisory analyzing the Alcatel-Lucent and Technip monitorship provisions here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Brittany Prelogar
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions