United States: For Obviousness, A Motivation To Combine Does Not Require A Suggestion That The Claimed Combination Is Preferred Or Most Desirable

In Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Nos. 12-1397, -1398, -1400, -1424 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 16, 2013), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's entry of SJ that asserted claims 13 and 15 of U.S. Patent No. RE37,564 ("the '564 patent") were not invalid for obviousness.

Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG (collectively "Bayer") own the '564 patent, directed to low-dose, extended-regimen combined oral contraceptive ("COC") products.  To address the risks of side effects, "escape" ovulation, and unintended pregnancy, Bayer developed a low-dose COC containing synthetic estrogen ethinylestradiol ("EE") and synthetic progestin drospirenone ("DRSP") administered according to a dosing regimen of either twenty-four active pills followed by four pill-free days (24/4) or twenty-three active pills followed by five pill-free days (23/5), as opposed to the traditional dosing regimen of twenty-one active pills followed by seven pill-free days (21/7).

Asserted claims 13 and 15 of the '564 patent cover Bayer's COC product, marketed under the brand name YAZ®.  Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Sandoz, Inc., Lupin Ltd., and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively "Defendants") filed ANDAs with the FDA seeking approval to market generic versions of YAZ® and asserting that the '564 patent was invalid.  Bayer responded by suing Defendants for infringement of claims 13 and 15 of the '564 patent, and Defendants counterclaimed that the asserted claims were invalid for obviousness.  The district court ultimately granted SJ in favor of Bayer, concluding that the asserted claims were not invalid for obviousness.  Defendants appealed.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit agreed with Defendants that the district court erred in concluding that asserted claims 13 and 15 were not invalid for obviousness.  The Court first observed that it was undisputed that the cited prior art set forth every limitation required by the asserted claims.

"[A] finding that the prior art as a whole suggests the desirability of a particular combination need not be supported by a finding that the prior art suggests that the combination claimed . . . is the preferred, or most desirable, combination."  Slip op. at 15 (alterations in original) (quoting In re Fulton, 391 F.3d 1195, 1200 (Fed. Cir. 2004)).

The Court also found that the prior art provided express motivation for a person of ordinary skill in the art to combine the limitations to derive the claimed COC products with a reasonable expectation of success.  The Court noted that one prior art reference expressly referenced another, which together with the first disclosed every limitation of the asserted claims.  The Court also noted that several of the cited references highlighted evidence that unregulated ovarian activity occurring during a seven-day pill-free interval could achieve significant follicular development, and that those references expressed concern that inadvertently extending the traditional pill-free interval via one or more missed pills could lead to escape ovulation and unintended pregnancy.  The Court also reasoned that Bayer's expert acknowledged that one of skill in the art at the time of the invention would have expected an even greater risk of such "missed pill" ovulation for users of low-dose COCs.

The Court thus concluded that missed-pill ovulation was a recognized concern with traditional 21/7 COCs, particularly for those on the market by 1993 that, like the claimed COC preparations, relied on low-dose EE.  "As the Supreme Court has stated, 'any need or problem known in the field of endeavor at the time of invention and addressed by the patent can provide a reason for combining the elements in the manner claimed.'"  Slip op. at 13 (quoting KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 420 (2007)).  The Court further reasoned that the references went beyond just illuminating a known problem—they also expressly proposed the claimed solution.

The Court rejected Bayer's argument that two of the references were primarily directed to older women who reached premenopause and were in need of hormone replacement therapy such that a skilled person setting out to design an oral contraceptive using EE and DRSP would not have used the 24/4 regimen intended to achieve effective hormone replacement therapy.  The Court stated that those references plainly disclosed preparations with hormone replacement and contraceptive applications, and that the product claims-at-issue did not distinguish between target patient populations by age or otherwise.

The Court also rejected Bayer's argument that the prior art taught away from the claimed COC preparations, focusing on statements in the "Guillebaud" reference as indicating that the conventional wisdom in the field favored 21/7 dosing for most patients and as suggesting that a reduced pill-free interval should be used together with higher-dose COCs for patients perceived to be at risk of escape ovulation.  The Court reasoned that those statements did not overcome the express teachings of multiple references, including Guillebaud, that a shorter pill-free interval would improve COC efficacy.  Furthermore, the Court noted that Guillebaud may have suggested condensing the pill-free interval while concurrently increasing the hormone dose for at-risk patients, but those two measures were never described as mutually dependent, and each could be expected to reduce missed-pill ovulation risks with or without the other.  "[A] finding that the prior art as a whole suggests the desirability of a particular combination need not be supported by a finding that the prior art suggests that the combination claimed . . . is the preferred, or most desirable, combination."  Id. at 15 (alterations in original) (quoting In re Fulton, 391 F.3d 1195, 1200 (Fed. Cir. 2004)).  The Court stated that just because one of several references indicated a preference for using 24/4 or 23/5 dosing regimens in tandem with higher-dose COCs did not mean the same missed-pill rationale could not also motivate applying the shorter pill-free interval to similarly improve other COC preparations.

Finally, the Court held that Bayer's evidence of secondary indicia of nonobviousness, including alleged unexpected results, expert skepticism, industry praise, and copying by others, was legally insufficient.  Regarding unexpected results, the Court found that data showing that 23/5 administration resulted in reduced follicular activity compared to 21/7 dosing of the same COC formulation merely confirmed that administering additional active pills resulted in additional follicular suppression, a matter of common sense.

Regarding expert skepticism, Bayer cited an FDA request for clinical safety data and data demonstrating efficacy benefits sufficient to justify the added synthetic hormone exposure required for the proposed 24/4 dosing regimen.  The Court found that that request in no way indicated FDA experts would have been surprised to receive such data, since the cited request reflected attention to the FDA's normal duties ensuring the safety and efficacy of new drugs by requiring actual data to corroborate statements in a new drug application.

Regarding industry praise, Bayer claimed that its invention was widely praised by experts in the COC field, relying on journal citations that referenced the findings stated in Bayer's published efficacy studies or discussed possible noncontraceptive indications for 24/4 COC regimens.  Bayer also relied on an article that was authored by the first-named inventor of the '564 patent describing Bayer's 24/4 COC regimen as an innovative strategy.  The Court found that the bare journal citations and self-referential recommendation fell well short of demonstrating true industry praise.  The Court also stated that industry praise of what was clearly rendered obvious by published references was not a persuasive secondary consideration.

Regarding copying by others, the Court rejected Bayer's contention that copying of its COC preparations by the defendants and other generic manufacturers supported its validity position, noting that such evidence of copying in the ANDA context was not probative of nonobviousness because a showing of bioequivalence was required for FDA approval.  Accordingly, the Court held that claims 13 and 15 of the '564 patent were invalid for obviousness in view of the cited references, and reversed the district court's SJ.

Judges:  Lourie (author), Schall, Prost
[Appealed from D. Nev., Judge Dawson]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, May, 2013

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
17 Nov 2018, Conference, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan partner Clare Cornell will present “Covert Trademark Use in the Internet: Licit or Illicit” at the Asian Patent Attorneys Association Conference.

20 Nov 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

As part of Strafford Publications’ webinar series, Finnegan attorneys Tom Irving, Josh Goldberg, and Cory Bell will analyze Patent Trial and Appeal Board denials and partial denials, offering take-home lessons applicable in

21 Nov 2018, Workshop, London, UK

Finnegan partner Leythem Wall will consider European claim drafting strategy and lead the Chemical Workshop during a two-day course, hosted by Management Forum.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions