United States: Derivative Product Companies: A Comparison Of New Rating Agency Guidelines

Last Updated: May 22 2013
Article by Robert C. Scherer, Ivan Loncar and Neil J. Weidner

Most Read Contributor in United States, October 2018

Derivative product companies ("DPCs") are structured financial entities that act as intermediaries for, or guarantors of, an affiliated entity (the "Sponsor") under interest rate or FX derivatives with a non-affiliated counterparty (a "Counterparty"). In a typical intermediation structure, a DPC will enter into a trade with a Counterparty and simultaneously enter into an offsetting mirror transaction with the Sponsor. In such manner, the DPC hedges its market risk while retaining the credit risk of its Counterparty.

Generally, there are two types of DPCs: termination and continuation1. The main difference between them is the consequence of certain 'trigger' events relating to the Sponsor. Upon the occurrence of a trigger event with respect to a termination DPC, all DPC trades – both those with the Sponsor and the Counterparty – will terminate. Upon the occurrence of a trigger event with respect to a continuation DPC, only Sponsor trades will terminate; Counterparty trades will remain in place and a contingent manager will step in to rehedge and otherwise manage the DPC's book of Counterparty transactions.

By complying with criteria established by the various rating agencies, some of which are discussed in this Memorandum, a DPC is able to achieve credit ratings that exceed those of its sponsor. Recently, perhaps in response to the market's need for highly rated swap counterparties, each of Standard & Poor's Ratings Service ("S&P"), Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") and Fitch Ratings ("Fitch") has published new guidelines (the "Guidelines") outlining its procedures and criteria for issuing counterparty ratings to DPCs2. While the Guidelines contain a number of similarities (such as bankruptcy-remoteness, operational independence, and the involvement of a contingent manager), this Memorandum will focus only on certain material differences among the Guidelines.

1. Maximum and Minimum Ratings

S&P. S&P links the maximum credit rating of a DPC to that of its Sponsor due to their ongoing financial relationship. S&P provides that the maximum rating elevation of a DPC above its Sponsor is three notches for a termination DPC and two notches for a continuation DPC3. S&P cites the additional length of time to which a continuation DPC will be exposed to post-trigger event market volatility, as well as the additional counterparty credit risk it will be exposed to when rehedging its book, as key reasons for the one-notch difference. As a result of the ratings linkage, as the Sponsor's rating changes, so will that of the related DPC. Accordingly, there is no ultimate maximum or minimum S&P rating for a DPC (i.e., 'AAA' is possible).

Fitch.Unlike S&P, Fitch expressly states that a 'AAA' rating is not attainable by a DPC. However, like S&P, Fitch links a DPC's rating to that of its Sponsor, but less closely than S&P does. Pursuant to the Fitch Guidelines, the rating for a properly structured and financed DPC will be the higher of (i) one notch above its Sponsor's rating and (ii) its stand-alone rating floor, which is 'AA' for a termination DPC and 'A' for a continuation DPC4. According to Fitch, the lower floor for a continuation DPC is due to the risks arising from (i) market volatility during the extended maturity period, (ii) the performance of the contingent manager and (iii) the difficulty rehedging the book during a post-trigger event period very likely characterized by general market stress.

Moody's. Unlike Fitch and S&P, Moody's does not establish maximum or minimum ratings for a DPC or link a DPC's rating to that of its Sponsor.

II. Capital Requirements

Although a DPC hedges market risk by entering into offsetting mirror transactions with a Sponsor, it continues to bear credit risk – the risk that the Counterparty will default on its obligations to the DPC. To mitigate such risk, each of S&P, Fitch and Moody's requires that a DPC maintain a level of capital sufficient for the DPC to be able to make payments to nondefaulting counterparties (including the Sponsor). Generally, capital requirements are a function of the DPC's exposure and the creditworthiness of its Counterparties. As stated by Moody's:

"[a] DPC's capital requirement will be higher when:

  • the ratings of the DPC's nonaffiliated counterparties are lower,
  • diversification across counterparties is less extensive (i.e., the greater the extent of default correlation and obligor concentration),
  • the exposures to the products in the DPC's derivative portfolio are greater (e.g., long-term currency swaps vs. short-term interest-rate swaps),
  • un-netted exposures across all transactions with a particular counterparty are higher, and
  • the interval over which the DPC is exposed to third-party default risk is longer."5

Moody's.Moody's expects a DPC's capital requirements to at least equal the sum of (i) the greater of (A) the amount determined pursuant to its capital model and (B) a 'minimum capital override' and (ii) additional amounts relating to unmodeled risks or risks arising from exotic trades.

The Moody's capital model is usually a simulation model that generates different outputs using various market variables and simulated Counterparty defaults. Moody's uses correlation and default parameters generated by its latest version of CDOROM to evaluate the assumptions in a DPC's model. The model must be run at least weekly and a failure to maintain sufficient capital must be a trigger event.

The minimum capital override is a baseline capital requirement that serves to mitigate overdependence on the model. Moody's simply describes the override as the aggregation of large counterparty exposures.

The unmodeled risks for which a DPC is expected to maintain additional capital include operational risks such as errors in the model, pricing errors and booking errors. Moody's will conduct on-site reviews to help it assess the need and/or size of such a buffer. Moody's will also require that additional capital be maintained in the event the DPC enters into non-vanilla transactions.

S&P.Whereas Moody's requires capital equal to the greater of two dynamic amounts, S&P requires that capital be maintained in an amount equal to the greatest of three amounts, two of which are dynamic and one of which is static.

With respect to the S&P Guidelines, the minimum level of capital is pre-defined. S&P will assign an ESS with respect to 'minimum equity capital' as set forth below:

With respect to the dynamic capital amounts, S&P will assign an ESS based upon two components: the scenario default rate ("SDR") and the event default rate ("EDR").

The EDR is similar to the minimum capital override required by Moody's in that it is based upon the aggregation of certain exposures. Again, S&P has pre-defined the test. The 'event risk amount' will be the highest of the following exposures:

  • to the one largest counterparty rated 'AAA' or lower;
  • to the two largest counterparties rated 'AA+' or lower;
  • to the three largest counterparties rated 'A+' or lower;
  • to the four largest counterparties rated 'BBB+' or lower; and
  • to all counterparties rated 'BB+' or lower.

Once the event risk amount is determined, it is compared to the DPC's capital resources and an ESS is assigned as follows:

The SDR test is similar to the simulation model required by Moody's in that S&P will estimate the level of counterparty default risk in the DPC's portfolio. S&P will generate the estimate using the most recent version of its CDO Evaluator with the following variables: the Counterparty, the amount of exposure to the Counterparty, the exposure period6, the Counterparty's industry and the country where the Counterparty is located. S&P will run the SDR at various rating levels and will assign an ESS based upon the highest level for which the DPC's capital resource is sufficient.

Fitch.The Fitch Guidelines provide much less detail about how a DPC can assess the sufficiency of its capital model. Fitch does not provide pre-defined minimums or formulas, but implies that it is open to the requirements similar to those promulgated by S&P and Moody's:

"Fitch will analyze the capital model's key assumptions and their compatibility with Fitch's rating criteria at various rating levels. Such assumptions include the default probability of counterparties as well as the correlation between obligors and market value stresses for exposures such as interest rates and currencies. . . . Fitch will also consider any qualitative assumptions or deterministic stresses that may be overlaid on the capital model, such as the impact of defaults by one or more of the largest counterparty exposures."7

III. Collateral Requirements

In addition to maintaining capital to offset the risk of Counterparty default, the Guidelines also require a DPC to hold collateral posted by the Sponsor to offset the risk of a Sponsor default. Such collateral must be in an amount at least equal to the market value of Sponsor transactions, as well as to cover the market risk to which a DPC will be exposed following a trigger event until such time as all trades with Counterparties are either terminated (in the case of a termination DPC) or rehedged (in the case of a continuation DPC). The amount of required collateral will vary by agency, as well as by DPC type.

Moody's. Moody's Guidelines provide that the collateral posted should be in an amount at least equal to the sum of (i) the mark-to-market of the back-end transactions with the Sponsor, (ii) a volatility buffer to mitigate the post-trigger event market risk and (iii) an amount to address unmodeled risks (e.g., liquidity problems). Although Moody's does not set forth a particular formula for the volatility buffer, it does state that annual 'backtesting' is required, whereby the modelgenerated volatility buffer is to be compared with actual market data. Backtesting is to be performed on individual trades, subportfolios and the entire portfolio. The goal of backtesting is to ensure that the model is conservative and accurate enough to cover actual risks. Moody's will consider the frequency and size of backtesting failures in providing a rating to a DPC.

S&P. As with its explanation of capital requirements, S&P is more detailed than both Moody's and Fitch. S&P requires collateral be posted by the Sponsor in an amount at least equal to the sum of (i) the mark-to-market of the DPC's trades with Counterparties and (ii) a volatility buffer. With respect to the volatility buffer, S&P estimates the post-trigger event market risk amount as the higher of (i) the highest-rolling 15-business day increase in the mark-to-market of the Counterparty trades over the previous three months and (ii) the higher of the average 15-business day changes in the mark-to-market plus two standard deviations over one-month and three-month periods. S&P will then compare the DPC's volatility buffer to its market risk estimate and assign an ESS to the DPC as set forth below:

Fitch.Fitch also requires the Sponsor to post collateral with respect to both the mark-to-market of the DPC's trades and a volatility buffer, which Fitch expects to be based upon conservative assumptions regarding various market factors, including volatility, bid-ask spread and the risk exposure period. For a continuation DPC, posting with respect to mark-to-market should be on a gross basis (i.e., no netting across Counterparties), while such amounts may be posted on a net basis for a termination DPC. Fitch will also permit the volatility buffer to be calculated on a net basis across all Counterparties.


As discussed above, although there are certain similarities among the Guidelines, material differences exist. Based upon such differences, Sponsors of DPCs can make an informed decision as to whether to pursue a rating from a particular rating agency.


1 Hybrids, which combine features of both termination and continuation structures, may also exist.

2 See Derivative Product Companies Rating Methodology and Assumptions (S&P, March 22, 2013) (the "S&P Guidelines"); Derivative Product Company Rating Criteria (Fitch, January 7, 2013) (the "Fitch Guidelines"); Moody's Approach to Rating Derivative Product Companies (Moody's, October 5, 2012) (the "Moody's Guidelines").

3 S&P analyzes a DPC's stand-alone creditworthiness to determine an "entity specific score" (or ESS) with respect to three different factors: (i) minimum equity capital, (ii) counterparty risk sizing and (iii) market risk volatility sizing. The number of notches above the Sponsor that a DPC may be rated is equal to the lowest ESS assigned to the DPC.

4 A DPC's rating may sink below the floor if, in Fitch's view, it is not properly structured or financed.

5 Moody's Guidelines at p. 5, section 3.1.2.

6 For termination DPCs, the exposure period is input one year. For continuation DPCs, the exposure period is the weighted average maturity of swaps between the DPC and the Counterparty.

7 Fitch Guidelines, p. 7.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions