The IRS Integrity and Verification Operations (IVO) group is
delaying a number of taxpayer refunds to screen for identity theft
and refund fraud.
Taxpayers identified by the program may receive a
"4464C" letter from IVO stating that their tax return is
being thoroughly reviewed so that the IRS can "ensure the
accuracy of return information." The letter states that the
IRS may contact the taxpayer or third parties for further
information and that if the taxpayer does not hear from the IRS or
receive his or her refund within 60 days from the date of the
letter, the taxpayer may contact the IRS directly. Once the IRS has
completed its review, it may send a full or partial refund or no
refund. Whatever the decision, the taxpayer can appeal it.
The IRS has indicated that the letters are part of the screening
program to combat stolen identity refund fraud and do not mean the
taxpayer has been selected for audit. The IRS uses algorithms
similar to a discriminate function system score to detect potential
refund fraud. Certain characteristics — like whether the
taxpayer is a first-time filer, is receiving a refund unusually
larger than the one from a prior year or is receiving W-2 income
unexpectedly — can trigger an alert to IVO to further
investigate the taxpayer's return.
Both the IRS and the Department of Justice (DOJ) Tax Division
have increased their efforts to combat stolen identity refund
fraud. During an April hearing before Congress, IRS Acting
Commissioner Steven Miller said the IRS had stopped 350,000 returns
with a total $2.5 billion in fraudulent refunds. In September 2012,
the DOJ issued Tax Division Directive 144, which is aimed at
increasing cooperation between federal and state governments, and
flexibility for U.S. attorneys' offices, to combat stolen
identity refund fraud
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
What’s the Option? We’re all still waiting for a final decision in Gillette.1 In the meantime, taxpayers have an option for the returns due this fall. They may compute their apportionment using one of the following two methods:
In this era of corporate inversions, there seems to be a lot of mud-slinging going around. Congress and the current Presidential administration would like to label large multi-national corporations as traitors.
In Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that taxpayers can meet their burden of proving that a government settlement was compensatory—and thus deductible—with evidence beyond the settlement’s terms.