The IRS Integrity and Verification Operations (IVO) group is
delaying a number of taxpayer refunds to screen for identity theft
and refund fraud.
Taxpayers identified by the program may receive a
"4464C" letter from IVO stating that their tax return is
being thoroughly reviewed so that the IRS can "ensure the
accuracy of return information." The letter states that the
IRS may contact the taxpayer or third parties for further
information and that if the taxpayer does not hear from the IRS or
receive his or her refund within 60 days from the date of the
letter, the taxpayer may contact the IRS directly. Once the IRS has
completed its review, it may send a full or partial refund or no
refund. Whatever the decision, the taxpayer can appeal it.
The IRS has indicated that the letters are part of the screening
program to combat stolen identity refund fraud and do not mean the
taxpayer has been selected for audit. The IRS uses algorithms
similar to a discriminate function system score to detect potential
refund fraud. Certain characteristics — like whether the
taxpayer is a first-time filer, is receiving a refund unusually
larger than the one from a prior year or is receiving W-2 income
unexpectedly — can trigger an alert to IVO to further
investigate the taxpayer's return.
Both the IRS and the Department of Justice (DOJ) Tax Division
have increased their efforts to combat stolen identity refund
fraud. During an April hearing before Congress, IRS Acting
Commissioner Steven Miller said the IRS had stopped 350,000 returns
with a total $2.5 billion in fraudulent refunds. In September 2012,
the DOJ issued Tax Division Directive 144, which is aimed at
increasing cooperation between federal and state governments, and
flexibility for U.S. attorneys' offices, to combat stolen
identity refund fraud
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
4 Oct 2016, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States
This webcast will explore how your company’s enormous stockpile of data, both publically available and proprietary, might be used in high-value ways, not only for future risk planning purposes but also to help unlock answers to some of your key business issues and challenges.
Describe how large and midsize life sciences leaders are optimizing their approach by strategically using data analytics for competitive advantage to protect their reputations and maintain a solid standing with health authorities and the OIG
Demonstrate how to build a global lens into analytics by combining existing internal data sources (compliance and others) with external data sources (structured and unstructured data)
A recent decision of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California should remind employers to regularly verify the actions of payroll service providers regardless of the provider's reputation and the longevity of the relationship.
The IRS announced in interim guidance that it would amend Section 20.1.7 of the Internal Revenue Manual to provide a methodology for the calculation of intentional disregard penalties under Section 6721...
3M returns to its argument that Treas. Reg. § 1.482-1(h)(2) is "procedurally invalid" because Treasury and the IRS failed to satisfy the requirements of section 553 of the APA when they promulgated the regulations.
Following a one day bench trial, Cook County Circuit Judge Thomas Mulroy ruled in favor of Treasury Wine Estates in Illinois False Claims Act litigation filed by the law firm of Stephen B. Diamond, PC.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).