United States: Delaware Chancery Court Holds That A Reverse Triangular Merger Is Not An Assignment By Operation Of Law

On February 22, 2013, the Delaware Chancery Court in Meso Scale v. Roche1 restored a degree of certainty to M&A planning by holding that the acquisition of a company through a reverse triangular merger (RTM) did not constitute an assignment by operation of law. The plaintiff, Meso Scale, had argued that the merger of Roche's acquisition subsidiary into target company BioVeris Corporation violated an anti-assignment clause in an agreement between BioVeris and Meso Scale. The Court's decision reaffirmed the traditional understanding of practitioners and commentators that an RTM does not involve an assignment, but the opinion also confirms that the parties' intent will be part of the analysis where the anti-assignment clause at issue is ambiguous.

Anti-Assignment Clauses and Change of Control Provisions

Anti-assignment provisions prohibit a party from assigning its rights and obligations under a contract without the consent of the other party. Change of control provisions give one party to a contract certain rights (e.g., the right of consent, the right to additional payment, or the right of termination) in the event that ownership or control of the other changes hands. Agreements sometimes contain both provisions or may combine both concepts into a single clause. A key consideration for any acquisition is whether the preferred choice of transaction structure will trigger any such restrictions found in the target company's contracts. Legal analysis of the issue depends on the transaction structure to be used in the acquisition and the specific language of the relevant contractual provision(s).

Choice of Acquisition Structure

The three basic acquisition structures are asset purchases, stock purchases and mergers. Asset purchases, by definition, require assignment of any contract included in the sale. Stock purchases do not involve an assignment (the target company remains the contract party post-acquisition) but do involve a change of control. Mergers, on the other hand, are governed by state corporation law and are less straightforward. The operative language of most statutes provides that the property and rights of the non-surviving entity seamlessly "vest" in the survivor, which courts have generally held to be a transfer by operation of law and not an assignment. Interpretive issues arise, however, when contractual anti-assignment language appears intended to cover something broader than traditional assignment, such as clauses prohibiting "assignment by operation of law or otherwise." Practitioners have traditionally assumed that reverse triangular mergers—in which the acquirer forms a new shell subsidiary and merges it into the target company, with the shell disappearing and the target surviving—would not violate such language because the target at all times remains the contract party, as is the case in a stock sale.2 As a result, reverse triangular mergers have historically been one of the most popular acquisition structures.

The Meso Scale Case

This traditional assumption, however, was upended in a 2011 preliminary ruling by the Chancery Court in Meso Scale. The case involved certain BioVeris intellectual property in which Meso Scale had an interest and a related consent agreement prohibiting assignment by BioVeris "in whole or in part, by operation of law or otherwise" without Meso Scale's consent. Roche acquired BioVeris in 2007 through an RTM, apparently for the primary purpose of obtaining these and other intellectual property rights, and promptly shut down BioVeris's operations post-merger, effectively leaving it an IP holding company. In denying Roche's 2011 motion to dismiss, the Court found that the "by operation of law" language could reasonably have been intended to cover reverse mergers in which the surviving target was treated as a mere shell.

The Chancery Court took up the issue again in Roche's 2012 motion for summary judgment, but this time held that an RTM does not amount to an assignment under Delaware law. Its holding began with an examination of Section 259 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which sets forth the effects of a merger:

When any merger or consolidation shall have become effective under this chapter, for all purposes of the laws of this State the separate existence of...all such constituent corporations except the one into which the other or others of such constituent corporations have been merged...shall cease....

The Court found the italicized portion to suggest that the surviving corporation does not effect any assignment. The Court also determined that such an interpretation of the anti-assignment provision in the BioVeris agreement was consistent with the reasonable expectations of the parties, because leading commentators had long stated that RTMs do not constitute assignments by operation of law. The Court distinguished two Delaware cases finding that the phrase "assignment by operation of law" would commonly be understood to include a merger, because those cases had involved forward mergers, in which the rights at issue transferred from the non-surviving party to the surviving entity. The Court also refused to follow the approach adopted by a California district court in the 1991 case SQL Solutions, Inc. v. Oracle Corp3 (which held that an RTM constituted a transfer of rights under a software license), because it turned on a California law principle that a mere change in the legal form of ownership of a business could result in an assignment depending upon whether it affects the parties protected by the anti-assignment provision. The Chancery Court noted this principle would extend to stock acquisitions, which Delaware jurisprudence firmly established did not involve an assignment. Finally, the Court noted that Meso Scale could have negotiated for a change of control provision, but had failed to do so.

Some Practical Guidance

The chief significance of the Meso Scale decision is its reestablishment of the general understanding that an RTM does not constitute an assignment in Delaware. This means that M&A attorneys may continue to utilize the RTM under Delaware law to avoid obtaining consents in the case of non-assignment provisions in the target's contracts. The case has a number of additional practical implications:

  • Importance of Careful Drafting:  In noting that Meso Scale had failed to negotiate for a change of control provision, the Court's decision validated the distinction between assignment versus change of control. When negotiating agreements, each contract party should therefore make sure it understands the scope of any proposed anti-assignment language and consider its impact on choice of transaction structure in any potential future sale of its or the counterparty's business. The parties may wish to set forth a separate change of control provision if such restriction is desired.

  • Intent of the Parties:  The Court's reasoning included an analysis of the intent of the parties under Delaware's "objective theory" of contract interpretation. Therefore, while the Meso Scale case stands for the general proposition that RTMs do not violate anti-assignment provisions, the intent of the parties will still be relevant. A contract provision that more strongly blurs the line between assignment and change of control could yield a different result.

  • Applicable LawMeso Scale establishes the rule for RTMs in Delaware, but it should be noted that the Chancery Court's analysis focused specifically on the language in DGCL Section 259 and Delaware's line of cases on stock acquisitions. Though Delaware corporate jurisprudence is often persuasive in other jurisdictions, other courts could reach different results, particularly in light of cases such as SQL Solutions. Acquisition planning (and contract drafting) should therefore always involve an analysis of the effects of mergers under all relevant laws.


1 Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. Roche Diagnostics GMBH, C.A. No. 5589-VCP (Del. Ch. Feb. 22, 2013).

2 By contrast, forward mergers—in which the target disappears and the acquirer or its shell subsidiary survives—could clearly be implicated by such a provision.

3 1991 WL 626458 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 1991).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions