The IRS has concluded in field attorney advice (FAA 20124601F)
that two corporations formed immediately prior to an asset sale
were ignored for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The field attorney advice addressed a corporation (the taxpayer)
that owned a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) and a subsidiary
(Sub 1). The taxpayer entered into an agreement to sell most of its
property to an unrelated corporation (the buyer), including a
certain property held by CFC (Property A). The taxpayer desired to
receive proceeds from Property A outside the CFC's country, and
the buyer desired to hold such property in a corporation formed in
a different country than CFC's.
Prior to such asset sale, the taxpayer restructured as follows
CFC formed a new corporation (Newco 1) by contributing Property
A in exchange for Newco 1 shares.
The taxpayer's owner (the owner) formed a new corporation
(Newco 2) on behalf of the taxpayer and transferred all of the
stock of Newco 2 to Sub 1 in exchange for consideration.
CFC then transferred the stock of Newco 1 to Newco 2 in
exchange for the retirement of certain intercompany debt owed by
CFC that was transferred to Newco 1 by the taxpayer.
After the restructuring, Sub 1 sold its Newco 2 stock to the
The IRS concluded that CFC sold Property A to the buyer in
substance and disregarded Newco 2 and Newco 1, citing Rev. Rul.
70-140 and Comm'r v. Court Holding Company (324 U.S.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
4 Oct 2016, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States
This webcast will explore how your company’s enormous stockpile of data, both publically available and proprietary, might be used in high-value ways, not only for future risk planning purposes but also to help unlock answers to some of your key business issues and challenges.
Describe how large and midsize life sciences leaders are optimizing their approach by strategically using data analytics for competitive advantage to protect their reputations and maintain a solid standing with health authorities and the OIG
Demonstrate how to build a global lens into analytics by combining existing internal data sources (compliance and others) with external data sources (structured and unstructured data)
A recent decision of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California should remind employers to regularly verify the actions of payroll service providers regardless of the provider's reputation and the longevity of the relationship.
The IRS announced in interim guidance that it would amend Section 20.1.7 of the Internal Revenue Manual to provide a methodology for the calculation of intentional disregard penalties under Section 6721...
3M returns to its argument that Treas. Reg. § 1.482-1(h)(2) is "procedurally invalid" because Treasury and the IRS failed to satisfy the requirements of section 553 of the APA when they promulgated the regulations.
Following a one day bench trial, Cook County Circuit Judge Thomas Mulroy ruled in favor of Treasury Wine Estates in Illinois False Claims Act litigation filed by the law firm of Stephen B. Diamond, PC.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).