The IRS has concluded in field attorney advice (FAA 20124601F)
that two corporations formed immediately prior to an asset sale
were ignored for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The field attorney advice addressed a corporation (the taxpayer)
that owned a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) and a subsidiary
(Sub 1). The taxpayer entered into an agreement to sell most of its
property to an unrelated corporation (the buyer), including a
certain property held by CFC (Property A). The taxpayer desired to
receive proceeds from Property A outside the CFC's country, and
the buyer desired to hold such property in a corporation formed in
a different country than CFC's.
Prior to such asset sale, the taxpayer restructured as follows
CFC formed a new corporation (Newco 1) by contributing Property
A in exchange for Newco 1 shares.
The taxpayer's owner (the owner) formed a new corporation
(Newco 2) on behalf of the taxpayer and transferred all of the
stock of Newco 2 to Sub 1 in exchange for consideration.
CFC then transferred the stock of Newco 1 to Newco 2 in
exchange for the retirement of certain intercompany debt owed by
CFC that was transferred to Newco 1 by the taxpayer.
After the restructuring, Sub 1 sold its Newco 2 stock to the
The IRS concluded that CFC sold Property A to the buyer in
substance and disregarded Newco 2 and Newco 1, citing Rev. Rul.
70-140 and Comm'r v. Court Holding Company (324 U.S.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Program Content: Continued efforts to reform state and local tax (SALT) regimes by state legislatures, courts, tax authorities and the Multistate Tax Commission are transforming the way businesses are reporting their income tax obligations to the states. Evidence of those changes includes the shift to market-based sourcing, mandatory unitary combined reporting and other provisions. Businesses are also trying to come up with approaches to handle indirect tax complexity in light of legislation and litigation challenging the Quill physical presence rule. In addition, the recent federal and state elections’ effect on the SALT landscape will come into focus.
On October 5th, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department published final, temporary and reproposed regulations1 under Sections 707 and 752 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).