United States: Tatum V. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Et Al.: Real Implications For ERISA's "Hypothetical Prudent Fiduciary" Standard

Overview

On February 25, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina issued an opinion and final judgment ruling in favor of defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company ("RJR") in a nationwide class action asserting breach of fiduciary duty pursuant to ERISA § 502(a)(2), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2), based on RJR's removal of two non-employer, single-stock investment funds from the company's 401(k) plan. See Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., __ F. Supp. 2d __, 2013 WL 692832 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2013). The decision by the Honorable Judge N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. significantly impacts ERISA's "hypothetical prudent fiduciary prong," which is applied under either the "substantive prudence" or causation analyses for breaches of fiduciary duty. In "stock-drop" cases, courts typically approach the burden of persuasion and standard for substantive/prudence in one of two ways—placing the burden on the plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical prudent fiduciary "would have" eliminated the suspect funds from the plan at a particular time; or placing the burden on the defendant to prove that a hypothetical prudent fiduciary "would not have" eliminated the suspect funds at that time. The court in Tatum, however, applied a "could have" standard for substantive prudence/causation because it found credible evidence at trial that a hypothetical prudent fiduciary could have either eliminated or retained the investment funds at issue. Ultimately, the court held that RJR's decision was objectively prudent: "RJR has satisfied its burden of establishing at trial that its actions were not imprudent and a hypothetical prudent fiduciary could have decided to eliminate the [investment funds] on January 31, 2000."

Application

This case has application whenever a company with employer stock in a 401(k) spins off a subsidiary and must determine what to do with the formerly-employer stock in the subsidiary plan. It also has implications for claims for fiduciary breach under ERISA where fiduciaries choose between two or more prudent investment options, such as where fiduciaries make a discretionary decision to add one of a number of prudent investment funds, substitute one prudent investment fund for another prudent fund, or remove what may be a violatile, yet prudent, investment option to protect participants from the risk of large losses to their retirement savings.

Background and Opinion

The suit stemmed from a decision made in 1999 by RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp., subsequently renamed Nabisco Group Holdings Corp. (NGH), to spin off RJR, thereby separating NGH's tobacco business and food business. As part of the spin-off, the 401(k) plan for the previously related entities had to be divided into two separate plans for the now-separate tobacco and food businesses. The plaintiff contended that RJR, its holding company, and two administrative committees (later dismissed) breached their fiduciary duty of prudence to participants of the RJR 401(k) plan when the defendants removed the stock funds of the companies involved in the food business, NGH and Nabisco Holdings Corp. (NA), as investment options from the RJR 401(k) plan approximately six months after the spin-off. Within a year after the divestment, both the NGH and NA stocks appreciated significantly. Plaintiff sought class-wide damages of well over $50 million, claiming as damages the lost appreciation denied them by the divestment of the NGH and NA stock funds (together, "the Nabisco Funds").

Although it was RJR's belief at the time that the elimination of the Nabisco Funds through Plan amendment was a settlor act to which no fiduciary duties applied—thereby requiring no minimum investigation, analysis, or procedure—the court found that the elimination was fiduciary in nature. It then held that RJR breached its fiduciary duties of procedural prudence when it decided to remove the Nabisco Funds from the RJR 401(k) plan without undertaking a proper investigation into the prudence of its decision.

Despite this finding, the court correctly noted that the plaintiff could only prevail if "the breach actually caused a loss to the plan." This required a showing that the decision was not reasonable under the circumstances, which is often referred to as "substantive prudence." Other courts consider this an issue of causation—if the decision was substantively prudent then any breach of procedural prudence cause no injury. The court first held that RJR had the burden to prove that its decision to divest the Nabisco Funds was objectively prudent. It then found that RJR readily satisfied that burden. The court based this holding on RJR's evidence that: a single stock fund carries significantly more risk than a diversified fund; the Nabisco Funds themselves were inherently risky investments due to potential tobacco-related liability, which therefore increased risk for the Plan participants; analyst reports during 1999-2000 regarding the Nabisco Funds would not compel a decision to maintain those funds in the Plan; the stock appreciation after divestment was neither expected nor foreseeable; and plaintiff's evidence of what other plans were doing was "highly questionable" and not persuasive as to what RJR should have done. In light of all these considerations, the court found that "RJR has satisfied its burden of establishing at trial that its actions were not imprudent and a hypothetical prudent fiduciary could have decided to eliminate the Nabisco Funds on January 31, 2000."

Analysis

This case is unique in a number of ways. It is not a "stock-drop" case where plan participants are suing for fiduciary breach for failure to eliminate employer funds from an ERISA plan when the employer company is on the brink of financial disaster. By contrast, Tatum contended that the Nabisco Funds—non-employer, single stock funds—should have been retained in RJR's 401(k), even though the stocks were dropping significantly in value prior to their elimination from the Plan and were inherently risky. Thus, where plan participants typically seek to recover actual "losses" to their plan investments, Tatum's "losses" were the Nabisco Fund's unforeseen post-divestment appreciation in value.

With regard to procedural prudence, this case also varies from others in that here the court found "fiduciaries" employees who believed they were acting as settlors. Rarely is this seen, even though courts tend to blur the lines between settlor and fiduciary acts. Here, because the Nabisco Funds were believed and intended to be eliminated by plan amendment, which requires no minimum investigation, analysis, or procedure, the acting employees naturally checked off fewer of the procedural requirements. Few cases of fiduciary breach address this type of inadvertent imprudence, free of claims of self-interest or true disregard for a fiduciary's duties.

Despite the distinctiveness in the case, Tatum has real implications for ERISA's "hypothetical prudent fiduciary" standard in certain scenarios. The case addresses for the first time the standard for substantive prudence or causation when those held to be fiduciaries are faced with an investment decision between two or more prudent choices. In most cases of fiduciary breach, such as in the stock-drop context, there is a bright line between prudent and imprudent actions, thus the "would have" standard makes sense. But the "could have" standard adopted by the court in this case is the appropriate standard where fiduciaries make a discretionary decision to add one of a number of prudent investment funds, substitute one prudent investment fund with another prudent fund, or, like in Tatum, remove what may be a violatile, yet prudent investment option from a plan to protect participants from the risk of large losses to their retirement savings. In cases such as these, the application of the "could have" standard is necessary to prevent expanded liability against fiduciaries who make the right substantive decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions