United States: ERISA Lawyers: The Exceptionally Privileged Few

Many litigators take two things for granted beyond death and taxes: first, that under the attorney-client privilege, they can freely communicate with their clients either electronically or in writing without fear of having to turn over their communications to other parties in litigation; and second, that under the attorney work-product privilege, the notes or memoranda created by the attorney need not be produced at the request of an opposing litigant.  However, those who have handled ERISA fiduciary litigation matters recently might have learned that blind faith in the efficacy of these privileges may lead to disaster in the courtroom and to uncomfortable conversations with malpractice carriers.

Attorney-Client Privilege

The attorney-client privilege shields from third parties confidential communications between an attorney and client for the purposes of seeking and obtaining legal advice.  It is the oldest of the privileges for confidential communications known to common law.  Its purpose is to encourage full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interest in the observance of law and administration of justice.  The privilege recognizes that sound legal advice or advocacy serves public ends and that such advice or advocacy depends upon the lawyer being fully informed by the client

Attorney Work-Product Privilege

In Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized the attorney work-product privilege, whereby information obtained or produced by or for attorneys in anticipation of litigation may be protected from discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  The privilege enables attorneys to prepare for and pursue litigation without fear that their strategy and preparation will be available to their adversaries.  The plaintiff in Hickman sought, without asserting necessity or justification, to secure written statements, private memoranda and personal recollections prepared or formed by an adverse party's counsel in the course of his legal duties.  As such, the court held that it falls outside the arena of discovery and contravenes the public policy underlying the orderly prosecution and defense of legal claims.  In performing his or her various duties, however, it is essential that a lawyer work with a certain degree of privacy, free from unnecessary intrusion by opposing parties and their counsel.

Fiduciary Exception to Privileges

In Riggs Nat. Bank of Washington, D.C. v. Zimmer, 355 A. 2d 709 (Del. Ch. 1976), which has been followed in the federal circuit courts of appeal, the Delaware Chancery Court held that trust beneficiaries could compel trustees to produce a legal memorandum related to the trust's administration because: (1) the trustees had obtained the legal advice as "mere representative[s]" of the beneficiaries, who were the "real clients" of the attorney; and (2) the fiduciary duty to furnish trust-related information to the beneficiaries outweighed the trustees' interest in the attorney-client privilege.  The court relied on well-established English common law that when a trustee obtained legal advice to guide his trust administration - and not for his own defense in litigation - the beneficiaries were entitled to the production of documents related to that advice on the rationale that the advice was sought for their benefit and obtained at their expense in that trust funds were used to pay the attorney.

Application to ERISA Litigation

The rationale of the Riggs decision has been held applicable in the ERISA litigation context.  See, e.g., In re Long Island Lighting Co., 129 F.3d 268 (2d Cir. 1997); Wildbur v. Arco Chem. Co., 974 F.2d 631 (5th Cir. 1992); and Geissal v. Moore Med. Corp., 192 F.R.D. 620 (E.D. Mo. 2000).  When an ERISA fiduciary seeks legal advice, she typically does so in carrying out her duties as a fiduciary, and thus is seeking legal advice on behalf of the plan participants and their beneficiaries.  Thus, the fiduciary exception applies in such circumstances and allows a litigating participant to obtain the substance of such communications between a fiduciary and an attorney because the attorney-client and attorney work-product privileges are outweighed by the need of the plan participants and beneficiaries to have the otherwise protected information.  The exception does not apply, however, to settlor functions, such as decisions to establish or terminate a plan, or to advice sought by a fiduciary in connection with the fiduciary's personal defense of a breach of fiduciary duty claim.  Thus, a fiduciary who is accused of having breached her fiduciary duties may consult with an attorney in defending against such allegations, and her communications with her attorney should be privileged.  (In such circumstances, however, the fiduciary should consult counsel other than the attorneys representing the plan in order to avoid conflicts of interest.)

Whether the participants and beneficiaries have to prove they have good cause for obtaining the information is in dispute, but a number of courts have held that good cause is not required in light of the rationale for the exception.  At least one court, in Donovan v. Fitzsimmons, 90 F.R.D. 583 (N.D. Ill. 1981), has also found that, in litigating alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, the U.S. Department of Labor effectively steps into the shoes of the plan participants and beneficiaries, entitling the federal agency to obtain documents that would otherwise be protected by the attorney-client and work-product privileges.

Recent Litigation Interpreting the Exception

These ERISA exceptions were interpreted and applied recently in Carr v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Civ. Action No. 4:10-CV-1729, an unreported 2011 decision in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.  Mr. Carr was a former Anheuser-Busch employee whose employment had been involuntarily terminated.  Mr. Carr brought suit under ERISA after his former employer denied his claim for severance benefits on the grounds that his termination was for "willful misconduct in violation of company policy."  The District Court decision resolved a dispute between the parties regarding whether the former employer would be required to produce certain documents in discovery relating to the denial of his claim for severance benefits.

The plaintiff sought production of certain e-mails regarding his claim that had been exchanged between the plan administrator and an associate general counsel in the defendant's legal department.  The first e-mail was sent by the attorney while the plan administrator was adjudicating the plaintiff's administrative appeal of the initial denial of his claim for severance benefits.  It contained general guidance from the attorney for use by the plan administrator while reviewing the appeal of the denied claim.  The second set of e-mails had been generated approximately two months later, after a determination had been made to deny the appeal, but before this denial had been communicated to the plaintiff.  This second set of e-mails did not contain advice as to the general procedural duties owed to each beneficiary, but rather related to the substantive merits of the plaintiff's specific claim for severance benefits and the content of the final decision letter denying the severance benefits that was to be transmitted to the participant.

After conducting an in-camera review of the documents in dispute, the court directed the defendant to produce the first e-mail, but held that the second set of e-mails was protected by the attorney-client privilege.  With respect to the first e-mail, the court determined that it is related directly to how the plan administrator interprets and conducts the appeals procedure contained in the severance plan and did not constitute advice to the plan and its beneficiaries as parties adverse to the plaintiff.  Rather, the court concluded that the first e-mail constituted advice to the plan administrator as to the fiduciary duties owed to all beneficiaries, including, but not limited to, the plaintiff.

The court distinguished the second set of e-mails and held that they were protected from disclosure under the attorney-client and work-product privileges.  Unlike the first e-mail, the second set of e-mails related to the substantive merits of the plaintiff's individual claim and the content of the final decision letter denying the severance benefits he was seeking.  At that point, the decision to deny the plaintiff's appeal had already been made and the plaintiff's only recourse was litigation.  The court concluded that the second set of e-mails was protected from disclosure under the attorney-client and work-product privileges because, by the time they were prepared, the plaintiff's interests had become sufficiently adverse to those of the plan administrator.

Conclusion

As noted above, the court in Carr conducted an in-camera review of the disputed documents, and it is likely that the specific content of those documents informed the court's decision regarding disclosure of their contents.  The authors caution that not all federal judges may be as protective of the interests of plan fiduciaries as was the case in Carr.

Fiduciaries and attorneys providing advice to plan fiduciaries should proceed with caution and assume that communications regarding their administration the plan, including their adjudication of specific claims, will be subject to disclosure.  Accordingly, trustees and other fiduciaries should remain ever mindful that, when acting as fiduciaries, they must act solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of the plan and disregard other considerations.  If the fiduciary and her advisor proceed in this matter, their communications will reflect this fact and disclosure of such communications will be of less concern.

Originally published on For Your Benefit, February 2012

www.foxrothschild.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions