United States: Supreme Court's Decision Reshapes Class Certification For Future Securities Class Actions

Michael D. "Mike" Redondo is a Associate in our Miami office

On February 27, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a long-standing circuit split on the issue of whether, when bringing a securities fraud class action under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant's alleged misrepresentations are material at the class certification stage and whether a lack of materiality can be used by the defendant to rebut the "fraud-on-the-market" presumption of reliance.

The "fraud-on-the-market" theory was endorsed by the Supreme Court in Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 US 224 (1988), and is based on the premise that "certain well developed markets are efficient processors of public information [and that in] such markets, the market price of shares will reflec[t] all publicly available information." The court also held in Basic that if a market is shown to be efficient, courts may presume that investors who invest in that market "indirectly rely on public, material misrepresentations through their reliance on the integrity of the price set by the market." This presumption, however, can be rebutted by "appropriate evidence." After the Basic decision, a circuit split developed whereby the First, Second, and Fifth Circuits ruled that plaintiffs must prove, and defendants may rebut, materiality before class certification. The Third Circuit developed a modification that did not require that a plaintiff needs to prove materiality prior to class certification, but did allow a defendant to present rebuttal evidence on that issue. By contrast, the Seventh and Ninth Circuits held that courts could not consider materiality at the class certification stage.

According to the plaintiff, the defendant violated §10(b) and Rule 10b-5 by making misrepresentations and misleading omissions regarding the safety, efficacy and marketing of two of its flagship drugs, which resulted in an artificially inflated stock price at the time the plaintiff purchased the stock. Thus, according to the plaintiff, when the truth came to light, the defendant's stock price declined, resulting in financial losses for the plaintiff and others who had purchased the stock during the relevant time period. The district court certified the class and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. The defendant argued that the District Court erred by failing to require the plaintiff to allege that the misrepresentations and omissions were material, and by refusing to consider the rebuttal evidence it had proffered in opposition to the plaintiff's class-certification motion.

The court began its analysis by noting that the only issue before it was whether the plaintiff satisfied Rule 23(b)(3)'s requirement that "of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members." Although the class-certification analysis must be "rigorous," Rule 23 "grants courts no license to engage in free-ranging merits inquiries at the certification stage." Recognizing, as the defendant suggested, that materiality is indisputably an essential predicate of the fraud-on-the-market theory, the court held that the fundamental question was actually whether proof of materiality is needed to ensure the "questions of law or fact common to the class will predominate over any questions affecting only individual members as the litigation progresses." The court held that, first, the question of materiality "is an objective one, involving the significance of an omitted or misrepresented fact to a reasonable investor [and therefore] is a common question for purposes of Rule 23(b)(3)." Second, the court held that there was "no risk whatever that a failure of proof on the common question of materiality will result in individual questions predominating[,]" because the failure of proof on materiality would "end the case for once and for all; no claim would remain in which individual reliance issues could potentially predominate." Thus, the court concluded that the failure to prove materiality "is properly addressed at trial or in a ruling on a summary-judgment motion."

The court rejected the defendant's argument that materiality should be treated no differently than the other fraud-on-the-market prerequisites, including "that the alleged misrepresentations were publicly known ..., that the stock traded in an efficient market, and that the relevant transaction took place between the time the misrepresentations were made and the time the truth was revealed." This was because, unlike materiality, market efficiency and publicity of the alleged misrepresentations "are not indispensable elements of a Rule 10b-5 claim." If class-wide proof failed on those points, individual plaintiffs could attempt to establish reliance through the "traditional" mode by demonstrating personal awareness of the defendant's statement and a relevant transaction based on that specific misrepresentation. A failure of proof on materiality, by contrast, establishes as a matter of law that a plaintiff cannot prevail on the merits of a Rule 10b-5 claim. The defendant also argued that "policy considerations" militated in favor of requiring precertification proof of materiality because certification "can exert substantial pressure on a defendant to settle rather than incur the costs of defendant a class action and run the risk of potentially ruinous liability." The court found that in this sense materiality was no different than other essential elements of a Rule 10b-5 claim, such as loss causation and the falsity or misleading nature of a defendant's alleged statement or omission, and that Congress failed to undo the fraud-on-the-market presumption in either the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act or the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act. Finally, the court rejected the defendant's argument that concerns for judicial economy were unwarranted, because "requiring proof of materiality before class certification would ... necessitate a mini-trial on the issue ... at the class certification stage."

Turning to the argument that the District Court erred by failing to consider the rebuttal evidence offered by the defendant, the court quickly dismissed this argument largely for the same reasons discussed above, noting that the rebuttal evidence aimed to prove that the misrepresentations and omissions alleged in the plaintiff's complaint were immaterial. The court once again reiterated that if the alleged misrepresentations and omissions are ultimately found immaterial, the fraud-on-the-market presumption of class-wide reliance would collapse, bringing the litigation to a close. The court recognized that a defendant can rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance by demonstrating that "news of the [truth] credibly entered the market and dissipated the effects of [prior] misstatements," but that "proof of that sort is a matter for trial."

Thus, the court's decision eliminates a defendant's ability to challenge the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance on materiality grounds at the pre-certification stage. However, it is important to note that both majority and dissenting justices seemed to agree that the court "ha[d] not been asked to revisit Basic's fraud-on-the-market presumption" itself. The concurring opinion of Justice Alito went so far as to state that "[a]s the dissent observes, more recent evidence suggests that the [fraud-on-the-market] presumption may rest on a faulty economic premise," and that "[i]n light of this development, reconsideration of the Basic presumption may be appropriate." Therefore, although the Amgen decision will allow plaintiffs to more easily certify securities fraud class actions going forward, it is possible that the U.S. Supreme Court may be willing to revisit the fraud-on-the-market presumption entirely at a later date.



The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions