United States: Highlights Of The Omnibus HIPAA/HITECH Final Rule

On January 25, 2013, the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) published the long-awaited omnibus final regulation governing health data privacy, security and enforcement (Omnibus Rule).1 The Omnibus Rule is a group of regulations that finalizes four sets of proposed or interim final rules, including changes to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy and Security Rules mandated by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act2 and proposed in 2010;3 changes to the interim final breach notification rule;4 modifications to the interim final enforcement rule; and implementation of changes to the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA). The Omnibus Rule goes into effect on March 26, 2013, and compliance is required by September 23, 2013. As expected, the Omnibus Rule did not finalize the May 31, 2011 proposed regulation regarding accounting for disclosures.

As was made clear by the statutory mandate of HITECH, the most significant changes involve business associates who are now directly subject to the mandates of the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules and HIPAA enforcement. In addition, covered entities will need to carefully evaluate changes to the breach notification rule, individual rights, additional requirements for Notices of Privacy Practices (NPPs) and the parameters around the use of protected health information (PHI) for marketing and fundraising.

BUSINESS ASSOCIATES

The Omnibus Rule expands HIPAA's coverage to directly regulate business associates and other "downstream" entities. Compliance with the new regulations is required by September 23, 2013. For business associate agreements (BA agreements) that were in effect prior to January 25, 2013, covered entities have until September 23, 2014 to amend those BA agreements to comply with the new rules.

1. The Omnibus Rule Expands the Definition of Business Associate

The Omnibus Rule expands the definition of "business associate" to include subcontractors who create, receive, maintain, or transmit PHI on behalf of a business associate. A "subcontractor" is any downstream entity that has no direct contractual relationship with a covered entity, but to whom a business associate delegates a function, activity or service performed on behalf of the covered entity or business associate.5 The preamble to the Omnibus Rule explains that the expansion of the definition of business associate to include subcontractors was necessary to ensure privacy and security protections for PHI do not lapse when a business associate delegates authority to and shares PHI with a subcontractor. The definition of business associate was also broadened to include entities such as health information organizations that provide data transmission services to a covered entity that require access to PHI on a routine basis. The definition of business associate excludes "conduits," or entities that merely transfer PHI on behalf of a covered entity or business associate, such as the U.S. Postal Service or Internet service providers. However, the preamble to the Omnibus Rule stresses that the conduit exception is "a narrow one" and that an entity that "maintains" PHI on behalf of a covered entity is a business associate, not a conduit, even if the entity does not view the PHI.6 Thus, a data or document storage company that stores and has access to PHI would be considered a business associate, even if it never views the information.

2. The Omnibus Rule Directly Regulates Business Associates and Their Subcontractors

Prior to the Omnibus Rule, a violation of a BA agreement merely exposed a business associate or its subcontractor to contractual damages enforceable only by the covered entity or business associate that was a party to the BA agreement. Under the Omnibus Rule, however, business associates and their subcontractors are now directly governed by HIPAA, subjecting them to potential criminal and civil sanctions for violations of HIPAA's Privacy and Security Rules to the same extent as covered entities. As referenced in the enforcement section below, these penalties can be substantial.

3. Portions of the Privacy and Security Rules Now Apply Directly to Business Associates

The Omnibus Rule sets forth specific violations of the Privacy Rule for which a business associate will be held liable. Under the Omnibus Rule, a business associate may be directly liable for violations of the Privacy Rule for:

  • uses and disclosures of PHI in violation of its BA agreement and/or the Privacy Rule;
  • failing to disclose PHI to the Secretary of HHS when investigating the business associate's compliance with the Privacy Rule;
  • failing to provide breach notification to the covered entity;
  • failing to disclose PHI to comply with an individual's request for PHI;
  • failing to provide an accounting of disclosures; and
  • failing to make reasonable efforts to limit uses and disclosures of PHI to the minimum necessary to accomplish the intended purpose.7

In addition, the Security Rule now applies equally to all covered entities, business associates and subcontractors. Specifically, the Omnibus Rule now explicitly requires business associates and their subcontractors to comply with the Security Rule's administrative, technical and physical safeguard requirements.8 This will include, among other obligations, conducting a risk analysis, developing and implementing HIPAA security policies and procedures, and training staff on those policies. It is important that business associates and subcontractors who have not done the hard work to come into compliance with HIPAA's Security Rule requirements develop and implement HIPAA compliance programs and put into place appropriate safeguards as soon as possible.

4. Requirement That Business Associates Enter into Agreements with Their Subcontractors

Prior to the Omnibus Rule, business associates were merely required to "ensure" a subcontractor agreed to follow the same Privacy and Security Rules that the business associate had agreed to comply within its BA agreement with a covered entity. The Omnibus Rule now requires business associates to enter into formal BA agreements with their subcontractors. The Omnibus Rule further clarifies that agreements between a business associate and a subcontractor must contain the same requirements as the BA agreement between the covered entity and the business associate.9 In other words, each BA agreement in a chain of BA agreements must be equally comprehensive in setting forth the particular party's HIPAA obligations. For example, the preamble notes that if the initial BA agreement between a covered entity and its business associate does not permit de-identification of PHI, then each subsequent BA agreement between business associates and their subcontractors must also prohibit de-identification. The Omnibus Rule also states that a covered entity is not required to enter into a BA agreement with a subcontractor of its business associate as that requirement belongs exclusively to the business associate.10

5. Compliance

Certainly, covered entities and business associates will need to address the significant changes to the regulation of business associates in the Omnibus Rule. In regard to revising BA agreements, covered entities that had BA agreements in place prior to January 25, 2013 will have until September 23, 2014 to amend those agreements to comply with the new rules. To assist with this undertaking, HHS recently published sample business associate provisions, which can be found here.

Aside from reviewing BA agreements, it is imperative business associates and subcontractors begin to immediately review their privacy and security policies and develop rigorous programs to comply with the Omnibus Rule as enforcement against business associates will begin in September 2013.

BREACH NOTIFICATION

The Omnibus Rule made significant changes to the interim final breach notification rule by: (1) adding a presumption that any unauthorized use or disclosure of unsecured PHI is a breach; (2) removing the prior risk of harm standard; and (3) adding parameters for the risk assessment that should be conducted to determine if PHI has been compromised following an unauthorized use or disclosure.

1. Omnibus Rule Revises Definition of Breach by Adding Presumption of Breach

The Omnibus Rule revised the interim final rule's definition of breach to include a presumption of a breach. Under the interim final rule, a "breach" was generally defined to be "the acquisition, access, use, or disclosure of protected health information in a manner not permitted [by the Privacy Rule] which compromises the security or privacy of the protected health information."11 The Omnibus Rule revised the definition of breach by adding an express presumption that an impermissible use or disclosure of protected health information is a breach "unless the covered entity or business associate, as applicable, demonstrates that there is a low probability that the protected health information has been compromised ....."12 The agency explained that it added this express presumption to ensure uniform application of the breach notification rule. The express presumption is also meant to promote consistency with 45 C.F.R. § 164.414's burden of proof, which places the burden on covered entities and business associates to either prove that breach notifications were provided or that the impermissible use or disclosure did not constitute a breach.13

2. Omnibus Rule Removes "Harm Standard" and Modifies Risk Assessment

The Omnibus Rule also revised the interim final rule by removing the "harm standard," i.e., whether there was a significant risk of harm to the individual whose personal health information was impermissibly used or disclosed. As above, an impermissible use or disclosure of PHI is, under the Omnibus Rule, presumed to be a breach unless it can be demonstrated that there is a "low probability that the protected health information has been compromised." Accordingly, the Omnibus Rule replaced the risk of harm analysis with a four-part risk assessment that is to be conducted following an unauthorized use or disclosure of PHI that focuses on whether there exists a low probability that the PHI has been compromised.14 The four factors of the modified risk assessment are as follows:

  1. The nature and extent of the protected health information involved, including the types of identifiers and the likelihood of re-identification;
  2. The unauthorized person who used the protected health information or to whom the disclosure was made;
  3. Whether the protected health information was actually acquired or viewed; and
  4. The extent to which the risk to the protected health information has been mitigated.15

HHS explains that all of the above factors must be evaluated in combination, and that, unless the evaluation concludes there is a low probability the PHI has been compromised, the covered entity or business associate must make a breach notification.16

The preamble provides some guidance and examples regarding how to apply the factors.17 For example, with respect to the first factor, the agency explains how an entity might evaluate whether an individual can be re-identified from an improperly disclosed list of patient discharge dates and diagnoses. For the second factor, the agency explains that if the protected health information is impermissibly disclosed to an entity that must comply with the HIPAA rules or to a federal agency, there may be a lower probability that the health information is compromised because the recipient is required to protect the privacy and security of that information. For the third factor, the agency explains that a forensic analysis of the electronic protected health information might show that the protected health information was never actually viewed. For the fourth factor, the agency explains that entities could potentially mitigate the risks to the protected health information through agreements to destroy or maintain the confidentiality of the protected information. The agency recognizes the difficulty in evaluating the risks through these assessments and stated it will issue additional guidance with respect to frequently occurring improper use or disclosure scenarios.18 It is clear, though, that the burden is definitely on the covered entity and/or business associate to demonstrate that there is a low probability the PHI has been compromised.

MARKETING AND FUNDRAISING

1. Marketing

The HIPAA Privacy Rule generally requires a covered entity to obtain authorization from an individual before using that individual's PHI for marketing purposes. Prior to HITECH, certain communications, including health-related communications, were excluded from the definition of marketing. The Omnibus Rule dramatically changes the definition of marketing by requiring authorization for all treatment and health care operations communications where the covered entity receives financial remuneration for making the communications from a third party whose product or service is being promoted. The term "financial remuneration" includes payments made in exchange for making communications about a product or service and does not include nonfinancial benefits.19 Accordingly, in order to make a marketing communication to an individual, the individual must provide a valid authorization, which, in addition to containing the elements and statements of a valid HIPAA authorization, must disclose the fact that remuneration is being received from a third party for making the communication.20

A narrow exception still exists for prescription refill reminders as such communications are excluded from the definition of "marketing" so long as any financial remuneration received by the covered entity in exchange for making the communication is reasonably related to the covered entity's cost of making the communication.21 Under this limited exception, a third party may cover the Covered Entity's cost of labor, supplies and postage to make the communication. Amounts in excess will constitute financial remuneration in violation of the exception and will require the covered entity to obtain a valid authorization.

Notably, the Omnibus Rule does not change the existing exceptions to the authorization requirement for face-to-face communications and promotional gifts of nominal value by a covered entity to an individual.22 In addition, communications promoting health in general and communications about government and government-sponsored programs are exempt from the marketing requirements.23

2. Fundraising

Previously, the HIPAA Privacy Rule required that a covered entity make reasonable efforts to ensure individuals who opt-out do not receive further communications. The Omnibus Rule toughens that standard by making any further fundraising communications with a person who has opted out a violation of the HIPAA Privacy Rule.24 Although the Omnibus Rule permits a covered entity to use or disclose certain limited PHI without an authorization for purposes of raising funds for its own benefit, a covered entity is now required to include in each fundraising communication a clear and conspicuous opportunity for the individual to whom the PHI relates to opt out of receiving further fundraising communications. The opt-out method used cannot cause the individual to incur an undue burden or more than a nominal cost, and a covered entity may not condition treatment or payment on the individual's choice. Once an individual opts out, the covered entity may not send fundraising communications to that individual.

3. New Requirements for Notices of Privacy Practices

The HIPAA Privacy Rule required covered entities to have and to distribute to individuals a Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP), which describes the uses and disclosures of PHI that the covered entity is permitted to make, information about privacy practices, the covered entity's legal duties and the individual's rights with respect to PHI.

The Omnibus Rule modifies and expands the statements that covered entities must include in their NPPs to ensure individuals are aware of the additional privacy protections and individual rights that were included in the HITECH Act.25 Specifically, the Omnibus Rule amends the content requirements of the NPP to require the following:

  • A statement that an individual's authorization is required for most uses and disclosures of psychotherapy notes (if the covered entity records or maintains psychotherapy notes), uses and disclosures of PHI for marketing purposes, disclosures that constitute a sale of PHI, and uses and disclosures other than those described in the NPP.
  • If a covered entity intends to contact an individual for fundraising purposes, a statement of such intent and the individual's right to opt out of receiving fundraising communications.
  • For health care provider covered entities, a statement informing individuals of the right to request the restriction of the disclosure of PHI to a health plan or other party when the PHI relates solely to a health care item or service for which the individual, or another person on behalf of such individual (other than a health plan), has paid the covered entity, and that the health care provider covered entity is required to agree to such request.
  • For health plan covered entities (other than certain issuers of long-term care policies) that intend to use or disclose PHI for underwriting purposes, a statement that the health plan covered entity is prohibited from using or disclosing PHI that is genetic information about an individual for such purposes.
  • A statement describing an individual's right to be notified following a breach of unsecured PHI.

The Omnibus Rule does not modify the current requirement that covered entities must redistribute its NPP when there has been a material change to it.

INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS

1. Restrictions on Uses and Disclosures of PHI

Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, an individual is permitted to request that the covered entity restrict both the use and disclosure of PHI for treatment, payment or health care operations and disclosures to others who are involved in the individual's care or payment for that care. However, a covered entity has not been required to agree to a requested restriction. The Omnibus Rule adds a provision that requires certain covered entities to agree to requests to restrict disclosure if the disclosure would be for the purpose of payment or health care operations, the disclosure is not otherwise required by law, and the PHI pertains only to a health care item or service for which the individual or another person (other than a health plan) has paid in full.26 HHS commented that while covered entities are not required to create separate medical records or otherwise segregate PHI subject to this restriction, covered entities will need to somehow flag in the record PHI that has been restricted.

2. Request for Access to PHI

The HIPAA Privacy Rule currently provides that an individual is permitted to review or obtain copies of his or her PHI that is maintained in a designated record set and, subject to limited exceptions, a covered entity must grant that access (or provide a written explanation of why access is being denied) within 30 days after receipt of the request.

The Omnibus Rule amends the Privacy Rule to require that if the requested PHI is maintained electronically, and the individual requests an electronic copy, the covered entity must provide the PHI in the electronic form and format requested by the individual if the PHI is readily producible in that form and format.27 If not, the covered entity must provide the PHI in a readable electronic form and format that is acceptable to the individual. In addition, if an individual requests his or her PHI be provided directly to another person, the covered entity must comply with the request if the request is in writing, signed by the individual, and identifies the designated person and where to send the PHI.

THE ENFORCEMENT RULE

1. Investigations and Compliance Reviews

The Omnibus Rule clarifies the parameters in which HHS will investigate a potential violation or initiate a compliance review. Under the Omnibus Rule, HHS is required to investigate a complaint if a preliminary review of the facts indicates a possible HIPAA violation due to willful neglect.28 Similarly, HHS must conduct a compliance review to determine whether a covered entity or business associate is complying with HIPAA when a preliminary review of the facts indicates a possible violation due to willful neglect.29 The preamble explains that compliance reviews may be used by HHS to investigate allegations of HIPAA violations brought to its attention through a media report or from a state or another federal agency. In cases where the initial review does not indicate a possible violation due to willful neglect, HHS retains the discretion to either investigate the matter further or conduct a compliance review.30

The Omnibus Rule also contains a subtle change in language that will likely have a profound impact on enforcement. Previously 45 C.F.R. § 160.312(a)(1) provided that if an investigation of a complaint or compliance review indicates noncompliance with HIPAA, HHS will attempt to reach a resolution of the matter through informal means. The Omnibus Rule changes "will" to "may," which means HHS may now move directly to a civil monetary penalty without having to exhaust informal resolution efforts.

2. Business Associates

The Omnibus Rule also clarifies that business associates (which, as above, are now defined to include subcontractors) are directly subject to HIPAA's enforcement provisions.31 In addition, the Omnibus Rule also provides that a covered entity is liable for a civil monetary penalty based on the act or omission of business associates or other agents acting within the scope of agency.32 The preamble explains that the analysis of whether a business associate is an agent will be done in accordance with the federal common law of agency and will be fact specific, taking into account the terms of the BA agreement as well as the totality of the circumstances between the parties. Further, the essential factor in determining if such a relationship exists is the right or authority of a covered entity to control the business associate's conduct in the course of performing a service on behalf of the covered entity.33

3. Civil Monetary Penalties

Prior to HITECH, HHS was only authorized to impose civil monetary penalties of no more than $100 per violation, with the annual amount of penalties for all violations of one provider capped at $25,000. Under HITECH and the Omnibus Rule, the penalties are as follows:34

  • If the covered entity or business associate did not know of the violation and would not have known of the violation by exercising reasonable diligence, the penalties are no less than $100 and no more than $50,000 per violation, with an annual cap of $1,500,000 for identical violations.
  • If the HIPAA violation is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, the penalties are no less than $1,000 and no more than $50,000 per violation, with an annual cap of $1,500,000 for identical violations.
  • If the HIPAA violation is due to willful neglect, but was corrected within 30 days of the covered entity or business associate discovering the violation, the penalties are no less than $10,000 and no more than $50,000 per violation, with an annual cap of $1,500,000 for identical violations.
  • If the HIPAA violation was due to willful neglect and was not corrected within 30 days, the penalties are no less than $50,000 per violation, with an annual cap of $1,500,000 for identical violations.

4. Factors Considered in Determining the Amount of a Civil Monetary Penalty

Once HHS has determined that a violation of HIPAA has been committed, it will consider a number of factors when determining the penalty to be imposed. The first factor considered is the nature of the violation, which includes a review of the number of individuals affected and the time period during which the violation occurred. The second factor is the nature and extent of the harm resulting from the violation, which includes physical harm, financial harm, reputational harm and whether the violation hindered an individual's ability to obtain health care. The third factor is the entity's history of compliance/noncompliance with HIPAA. The fourth factor relates to the financial condition of the covered entity or business associate and the entity's ability to comply with HIPAA as well as whether the penalty would jeopardize the covered entity or business associate's ability to provide or to pay for health care.35

5. Affirmative Defenses

The Omnibus Rule modifies the affirmative defenses available to covered entities and business associates. The Omnibus Rule provides that a civil monetary penalty may not be imposed on a covered entity or business associate if a criminal penalty has already been imposed for the same violation. In addition, the Omnibus Rule also limits the affirmative defenses available to an entity that violates HIPAA. If the violation occurred prior to February 18, 2009, the Secretary of HHS is not allowed to impose a civil monetary penalty if the entity did not have knowledge of the violation, nor would have known of the violation through reasonable diligence. For violations ocurring on or after February 18, 2009, an affirmative defense is available only if the violation was not due to willful neglect and was corrected within 30 days of when the entity knew, or by exercising "reasonable diligence" would have known, of the violation.36

6. Impact

The Omnibus Rule significantly strengthens HIPAA enforcement, which should be of concern to all covered entities and particularly to business associates. Over the last two years OCR has become much more aggressive in enforcing HIPAA and now has a more robust enforcement rule at its disposal. Thus, it is more important than ever for covered entities and business associates to understand their obligations under HIPAA and have compliance programs in place to help make sure those obligations are met.

Footnotes

1 78 Fed. Reg. 5,566 (Jan. 25, 2013) (the complete Omnibus Rule can be found here).

2 Title XII of Division A and Title IV of Division B of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5 (Feb. 17, 2009).

3 75 Fed. Reg. 40,868 (July 14, 2010).

4 74 Fed. Reg. 42,740 (Aug. 24, 2009).

5 45 C.F.R. § 160.103, 78 Fed. Reg. at 5573.

6 78 Fed. Reg. at 5571-72.

7 45 C.F.R. § 164.502 (a)(3)-(4); 78 Fed. Reg. at 5598-99.

8 45 C.F.R. § 164.104(b).

9 45 C.F.R. § 164.504(e)(5).

10 78 Fed. Reg. at 5573.

11 45 C.F.R. § 164.402.

12 78 Fed. Reg. at 5695 (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. § 164.402).

13 78 Fed. Reg. at 5641.

14 Id.

15 78 Fed. Reg. at 5695 (to be codified at § 164.402).

16 78 Fed. Reg. at 5643.

17 See 78 Fed. Reg. at 5642-43.

18 78 Fed. Reg. at 5643.

19 78 Fed. Reg. at 5593, 5595 (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. § 164.501.

20 42 C.F.R. § 164.508.

21 78 Fed. Reg. at 5596-97.

22 78 Fed. Reg. at 5596.

23 78 Fed. Reg. at 5597.

24 78 Fed. Reg. at 5680.

25 78 Fed. Reg. at 5624-26.

26 78 Fed. Reg. at 5626, 5628.

27 78 Fed. Reg. at 5631.

28 45 C.F.R. § 160.306(c)(1).

29 45 C.F.R. § 160.308(a).

30 78 Fed. Reg. at 5579.

31 45 C.F.R. § 160.402(a).

32 45 C.F.R. § 160.402(c).

33 78 Fed. Reg. at 5581.

34 45 C.F.R. § 160.404(b)(2).

35 45 C.F.R. § 160.408.

36 45 C.F.R. § 160.410.

www.cozen.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.
McLane Middleton, Professional Association
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.
McLane Middleton, Professional Association
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions