United States: Illinois Appellate Court Holds Department Improperly "Corrected" Taxpayer’s Apportionment Formula As "Mathematical Error"

The Illinois Appellate Court recently addressed the Department of Revenue's ability to assess additional tax through a correction of a "mathematical error" when the Department has a substantive dispute with the taxpayer's position on its return.1 The Court held that the Department's treatment of the taxpayer's use of a certain apportionment factor formula as a "mathematical error" was improper, and that the use of a proper formula was substantive in nature, necessitating the issuance of a "notice of deficiency."2 Due to the Department's "failure to issue a notice of deficiency,"3 the Court affirmed the circuit court's decision in favor of the taxpayer.


Illinois phased in a single sales factor apportionment formula between 1998 and 2001, replacing its historic three factor double-weighted sales formula.4

On October 8, 1999, during the phase-in of the single sales factor in Illinois, the taxpayer, Ameritech Corporation (Ameritech), merged with SBC Teleholdings, Inc. (SBC). Ameritech's federal tax liability for 1999 was reported on two separate federal consolidated returns. On the federal returns, Ameritech made a ratable election pursuant to Treasury Regulation Sec. 1.1502-76. Pursuant to the ratable election, Ameritech computed its taxable income based on the number of days in each short period except for extraordinary items that were fully recognized in the period in which they occurred.

Ameritech also filed two separate 1999 Illinois income tax returns, one for the pre-merger period and the other for the post-merger period. For both returns, Ameritech apportioned its income to Illinois using the methodology prescribed for "tax years ending on or after December 31, 1999 and before December 31, 2000:" a three-factor formula with an 83 1/3 percent sales factor.5 When the Department processed the returns, it treated Ameritech's use of the 83 1/3 percent sales factor for the return covering the short period ending October 8, 1999 as a "mathematical error."6 The Department changed the apportionment formula for the premerger return to the formula applicable to "tax years ending on or after December 31, 1998 and before December 31, 1999:" a three-factor formula with a lower 66 2/3 percent sales factor.7 This change had the effect of increasing the amount of tax due from Ameritech for the first short period.

The Department did not issue a "notice of deficiency" when it made this change and give Ameritech the opportunity to protest the change. Instead, the Department collected the amount of additional tax it asserted was due from tax payments Ameritech had previously paid. Ameritech only received notice through a Department letter dated May 13, 2002, after an affiliated company requested the worksheets detailing Ameritech's history of overpayment of income tax.

In addition, Ameritech underwent an Illinois audit that covered the 1999 premerger return at issue. The auditor once again utilized the apportionment formula with a 66 2/3 percent sales factor. Following the audit, despite the auditor's use of this sales factor, Ameritech used the 83 1/3 percent sales factor apportionment formula to file an amended return for the premerger period, which resulted in the same figures as those contained in its original premerger return. Ameritech then sought a refund for this period based on the Department's use of an improper apportionment formula. The refund claim used the same apportionment factor weighting used in the original return.

The Department denied the refund request with respect to the premerger return, rejecting Ameritech's argument that the apportionment formula with the more heavily weighted sales factor was applicable to the premerger return. Also, the Department rejected Ameritech's contention that during the processing of the original premerger return, the Department improperly corrected the apportionment factor calculation as a "mathematical error" instead of a substantive change that the Department had to provide the taxpayer with both notice and an opportunity to protest.

Ameritech responded by timely filing a protest of the Department's denial and requested an administrative hearing. Ameritech protested the Department's adjustment of the apportionment formula and the use of the "mathematical error" procedure to make the change in the apportionment weighting. The administrative proceedings were based on a stipulated record and written arguments that were submitted to the administrative law judge (ALJ). The ALJ found in favor of the Department,8 prompting Ameritech to file a complaint for administrative review.

The circuit court entered an order, rejecting the ALJ's determination that the Department's use of the mathematical error procedure was proper. According to the circuit court, the apportionment factor at issue required extensive analysis of both federal and state law and as a result, necessitated the issuance of a notice of deficiency by the Department.9 It also stated that because the mathematical error procedure was improper and a notice of deficiency was not issued, it was not required to decide whether the notices eventually issued by the Department were sufficient or whether the apportionment factor applied to the premerger return was substantively erroneous. Nonetheless, the court ordered the reversal of the administrative decision and also affirmatively ordered the Department to issue a refund to Ameritech.10 The Department appealed to the Appellate Court.

Department Improperly Used Mathematical Error Procedure

On appeal, the Appellate Court affirmed the circuit court's conclusion, finding that the Department improperly used the mathematical error procedure to correct the premerger return and had forfeited any argument relating to its statutory authority to offset Ameritech's overpayments against other liabilities.

In reaching these conclusions, the Court noted that the Department can assess and collect an underpayment due to an understatement of tax on a return in one of two ways. For an understatement attributable to a simple "mathematical error" on a return, the Department may summarily correct the error on the return. For an understatement attributable to all reasons other than a "mathematical error," the Department is required to issue a "notice of deficiency."11

In the event that the Department makes a correction of a mathematical error, it must issue a notice of additional tax due no later than three years after the date the return was filed. While the taxpayer does not have the immediate right to protest the Department's correction before additional taxes are deemed assessed and due, the taxpayer does have the right to seek a refund.12 On the other hand, when the Department issues a notice of deficiency,13 the taxpayer has a right to formally protest the additional tax that the Department proposes is due14 and the Department cannot collect the additional tax until the taxpayer fails to file a protest, or the protest has been resolved.

The Court further noted that prior decisions15 addressing the use of the mathematical error emphasized the general proposition that "substantive matters requiring extensive analysis" require a notice of deficiency and that the mathematical error correction authority is reserved for cases of facially defective returns, i.e. simple mistakes in computation and indisputable errors.

Applying these rules to the present case, the Court found that the determination of the correct apportionment formula for the premerger return was a substantive dispute, requiring the interpretation of state and federal authorities. Since the issue was substantive, and not a simple arithmetic error or incorrect computation, the Department had improperly utilized the mathematical error procedures and failed to issue a notice of deficiency as required. This meant that the denial of Ameritech's refund request, which was based on the Department's authority to summarily correct mathematical errors, was also improper.

The Court took the position that it was not required to resolve the substantive dispute regarding the correct apportionment formula for the return at issue. It also decided that since the Department raised its defense regarding its statutory authority to offset overpayments for the first time in the circuit court, rather than in the administrative process, the Department effectively forfeited its right to have the defense considered on appeal.16

Therefore, the Appellate Court affirmed the circuit court's reversal of the Department's denial of Ameritech's request for a refund.


Although the Department may seek reconsideration of the appellate decision or appeal the decision to the Illinois Supreme Court, this decision reflects the importance of following proper procedures in order for the Department to challenge a taxpayer's position on a return. The mere failure of the Department to issue a notice of deficiency with respect to the taxpayer's 1999 premerger return precluded the Department from denying the taxpayer's refund request. It also highlights the differences between a mathematical error and a substantive issue as a cause for an adjustment to a taxpayer's return.

This case highlights what has been a troubling practice of the Department – "adjusting" returns filed by taxpayers without providing notice of the adjustments to taxpayers. Although he ruled against the taxpayer, even the Department's own ALJ summarily dismissed the Department's contention that no contemporaneous notice of such adjustments is required.


1 AT&T Teleholdings, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, Illinois Appellate Court, First District, No. 1-11- 3053, Dec. 28, 2012.

2 A "mathematical error" is a term of art in the Illinois Income Tax Act that is broader than just a computational error. 35 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/1501(a)(12) defines the term "mathematical error" to include: "(A) arithmetic errors or incorrect computations on the return or supporting schedules; (B) entries on the wrong lines; (C) omission of required supporting forms or schedules or the omission of the information in whole or in part called for thereon; and (D) an attempt to claim, exclude, deduct, or improperly report, in a manner directly contrary to the provisions of the Act and regulations thereunder any item of income, exemption, deduction, or credit."

3 Technically, while the Court's decision emphasizes the fact that a notice of deficiency had not been issued, the Department could not have issued such a notice because the Department's adjustment merely reduced the amount of the refund due to the taxpayer rather than resulting in an underpayment.

4 35 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/304(a) reads in pertinent part, "[i]f a person other than a resident derives business income from this State and one or more other states, then, for tax years ending on or before December 30, 1998, and except as otherwise provided by this Section, such person's business income shall be apportioned to this State by multiplying the income by a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the property factor (if any), the payroll factor (if any) and 200% of the sales factor (if any), and the denominator of which is 4 reduced by the number of factors other than the sales factor which have a denominator of zero and by an additional 2 if the sales factor has a denominator of zero."

5 35 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/304(h)(2) reads, "for tax years ending on or after December 31, 1999 and before December 31, 2000, 8 1/3% of the property factor plus 8 1/3% of the payroll factor plus 83 1/3% of the sales factor." Ameritech used this formula for the premerger period based on its position that it kept its books open until the end of 1999 since it elected to calculate its income for the premerger period based on a prorated amount of its total 1999 income for its federal tax return.

6 35 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/903(a)(1).

7 35 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/304(h)(1) reads, "for tax years ending on or after December 31, 1998 and before December 31, 1999, 16 2/3% of the property factor plus 16 2/3% of the payroll factor plus 66 2/3% of the sales factor."

8 The ALJ raised an argument in favor of classifying the issue as a mathematical error that was not raised by the Department. This denied Ameritech the opportunity to address the argument in its written submissions. This type of ALJ action is what propelled the movement to create an independent tax tribunal. Moreover, the proper standard of review was in dispute.

9 The circuit court also decided on the Department's subsequently filed motion for reconsideration based on the court's failure to address the Department's statutory authority to offset a taxpayer's overpayments against other liabilities. It determined that this statutory authority did not alter its conclusion that the mathematical error procedure was improper as to Ameritech's premerger return.

10 On appeal, the Appellate Court determined that this affirmative order to "cause a refund" to be issued was erroneous. The Appellate Court ultimately remanded the matter to the circuit court to be remanded to the Department for additional proceedings.

11 35 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/903(a)(1).

12 35 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/909(d).

13 The Department must issue the notice within three years of the filing of a taxpayer's return.

14 35 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/908.

15 Department of Revenue v. Walsh, 554 N.E.2d 433 (Ill. App. Ct. 1990); The Holding Co. v. Department of Revenue, 574 N.E.2d 11 (Ill. App. Ct. 1991).

16 People v. Blair, 831 N.E.2d 604 (Ill. 2005).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.