The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB")
responding to the growing amount of student loan debt, has
initiated a request for information "to determine options that
would increase the availability of affordable payment plans for
borrowers with existing private student loans" on February 27,
2013. Comments must be received on or before April 8,
Among other things, the notice and request for information from the
public published in the Federal Register, continues the
process of the CFPB's exploration of opportunities to spur
refinance and modification activity in the private student loan
market. Specifically, the request seeks information on
options to increase the level of affordable repayment options for
both pre-default and post-default borrowers in distress who wish to
repay their loans but may be lacking near-term ability to service
According to the CFPB, there are more than 38 million student loan
borrowers with over $1.1 trillion in outstanding debt.
Further, a recent report by the CFPB and Department of Education
submitted to Congress found that "as of the end of 2011, there
were more than $8 billion in defaulted private student loan
balances, with even more in delinquency."
Under the Consumer Financial Protection Act (Section 1035 of the
Dodd-Frank Act) the CFPB student loan ombudsman has the authority
to make "appropriate recommendations" to the Director of
the Bureau, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of
Education, and Congress.
The CFPB in the Notice recognizes that the "private student
loan market might ... benefit from further loan modification
activity" like in the residential mortgage loan market.
The Notice speculates that with concessions, creditors might
increase the net present value of distressed loans through such
modifications. The CFPB acknowledges, however, there are
differences among private student loans and mortgages that might
fundamentally impact creditors' economic calculus for
determining whether to offer a change in repayment terms.
Also, the CFPB states that there are a number of potential
impediments to offering alternative repayment options, including:
"(a) Accounting guidelines that add complexity when offering
alternative repayment options without charging off the loan; (b)
operational and information technology limitations among loan
servicers; and (c) incentive mismatch among trustees,
administrators, and/or noteholders in asset-backed securities
trusts and loan servicers."
The CFPB is interested in responses in the following general
categories: scope of hardship; current options for borrowers
with hardship; past and existing loan modification programs for
other types of debt; servicing infrastructure; consumer reporting
and credit scoring; lender participation; borrower awareness; and
impact on spillover markets (e.g., access to mortgage
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
A federal district court in California recently ruled that a consumer who voluntarily provided a cellphone number in order to complete an online purchase gave "prior express consent" to receive a text message from the business’s vendors under the TCPA.
Today at the National Association of Attorneys General meeting in Washington, DC, best practices were suggested that could significantly change the process for AG approval and oversight of multistate investigations and large-scale consumer investigations.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act amended a provision of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 that had provided most private equity fund managers with an exemption from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission registration.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
The CPSC is voting soon on whether to hold a workshop to discuss potential ways to reduce third party testing costs through additional "determinations" that certain products or materials do not require third party testing.
As previously noted on this blog, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued an interim final rule in June 2012 to implement the Equal Access to Justice Act. At the time, the CFPB requested public comment on the interim final rule.
On Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit remanded Robins v. Spokeo, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-05306-ODW-AGR on the basis that the district court erred in finding that the Plaintiff, Thomas Robins ("Robins"), did not have Article III "injury-in fact" standing to file his suit alleging violations of Fair Credit Reporting Act.
What now? That's a question that consumer financial products and services providers, their advertisers and marketers, and related vendors have been eagerly asking about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).