Effective January 1, 2013, the Illinois estate tax exemption increased to $4 million, with a maximum rate of 16%. There are a number of differences between the Illinois estate tax system and the federal estate and gift tax regime. These differences require proper estate planning for Illinois residents and nonresidents with real estate in Illinois.
The key differences between the Illinois estate tax system and the federal estate and gift tax regime are as follows:
The Illinois estate and generation-skipping tax exemption is $4 million, while the federal estate and generation skipping tax exemption is $5.25 million in 2013.
The Illinois estate tax exemption is not indexed for inflation. The federal estate tax exemption is indexed for inflation and has increased by $250,000 since 2011 due to the inflation adjustment.
Illinois does not impose a gift tax on transfers made during life; however, there is a federal gift tax on lifetime transfers.
The maximum estate tax rate for Illinois is 16%. The federal estate tax rate is 40%.
Illinois does not recognize "portability" for surviving spouses. Under the federal estate tax system, a surviving spouse can elect to take advantage of any unused portion of the estate tax exemption of his or her predeceased spouse.
Without proper planning, the discrepancies between the Illinois estate tax system and the federal gift and estate tax regime could result in an Illinois resident, or a nonresident with real estate located in Illinois, paying unnecessary estate taxes. Specifically, individuals with an estate between $4 million and $5.25 million and couples with a combined estate between $8 million and $10.5 million need to ensure that their estate plan adequately addresses the differences between the Illinois estate tax system and the federal gift and estate tax regime.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide
to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
A recent decision of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California should remind employers to regularly verify the actions of payroll service providers regardless of the provider's reputation and the longevity of the relationship.
The IRS announced in interim guidance that it would amend Section 20.1.7 of the Internal Revenue Manual to provide a methodology for the calculation of intentional disregard penalties under Section 6721...
3M returns to its argument that Treas. Reg. § 1.482-1(h)(2) is "procedurally invalid" because Treasury and the IRS failed to satisfy the requirements of section 553 of the APA when they promulgated the regulations.
Following a one day bench trial, Cook County Circuit Judge Thomas Mulroy ruled in favor of Treasury Wine Estates in Illinois False Claims Act litigation filed by the law firm of Stephen B. Diamond, PC.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).