On February 14, 2013, SEC Chairman Elisse Walter at long last
indicated, in testimony for the Senate Banking Committee, that the
SEC's final regulations regarding "municipal
advisors" will "address ,,, the need for an
exception" to the definition of "municipal advisor"
for appointed board members of municipal securities issuers.
This acknowledgment came more than two years after the firestorm
ignited by the SEC's suggestion in proposed regulations issued
December 20, 2010
that appointed board members of issuers of municipal securities
were or might be required to register as "municipal
advisors," That suggestion provoked a substantial share
of the over 1,000 comment letters received by the SEC on the
The SEC's final regulations have not yet been issued and the
phrasing of the exception remains to be seen. However,
Chairman Walter's testimony is consistent with the conclusion
long since reached by most municipal market participants that the
SEC's interpretation of the Dodd-Frank legislation as requiring
or potentially requiring registration as municipal advisors by
non-elected board members who provide input relating to
issuance of municipal securities in the course of their board
duties was an overreach that would not be implemented. For
board members appointed to municipal bond issuers or to issuers of
state-sponsored Section 529 program municipal fund securities,
Chairman Walter's pronouncement is as close to a valentine
as the SEC dispenses.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The U.S. Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis (the "BEA") recently released the final version of the BE-180 report, a five-year benchmark survey that collects data on transactions between U.S. persons that are financial services providers and non-U.S. persons.
Overseas Shipping Group ("Overseas") recently sued its former attorneys, a prominent New York-based law firm, for legal malpractice in drafting credit agreements that resulted in the company incurring an estimated $463 million in tax liability.
In a win for the collection industry, in Bentrud v. Bowman, Heintz, Boscia & Vician, the Seventh Circuit again declined to apply the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to collection-related court proceedings.
The OCIE's cybersecurity examination initiative was launched in April 2014 to assess cybersecurity preparedness in the securities industry and gather information on common practices and trends among registered firms.
On August 20, 2015, the CFPB and the NYDFS filed a lawsuit against two companies and three of the companies' individual managers for deceiving consumers about the costs and risks of their pension advance loans.