United States: Bankruptcy Loses Arguments For Special Relief Under Prepetition Agreements For Environmental Liability

A recent case from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York addressed the recurring conflict between the goals of bankruptcy law, which seeks to give debtors a fresh start, and the goals of federal and state environmental cleanup laws, which seek to ensure remediation of contaminated properties. The court's decision provides useful insight regarding when and how bankruptcy law should convert a prepetition contractual obligation to remediate a site into a claim to be managed like any unsecured creditor claims in a bankruptcy proceeding.

In Route 21 Associates of Belleville v. MHC, Inc.,1 the parties' dispute involved responsibility for remediating contamination of a site Route 21 had long ago bought from a company to which MHC is a successor in interest. About a year after purchasing the site from MHC's predecessor, Route 21 discovered contamination, and MHC's predecessor remediated that contamination and warranted that the site was clean. But seven years later, Route 21 discovered more contamination in the form of a leaking underground storage tank. Route 21 sued MHC under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act, a state law equivalent to the federal Superfund law. The parties eventually settled this action. MHC's predecessor agreed to do two things as part of the settlement. First, it agreed to remediate the newly-discovered contamination under the direction of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ("NJDEP") to a sufficient degree of cleanliness so as to obtain a "no further action" letter from the state. Second, it agreed to indemnify Route 21 for any future environmental clean-up liability Route 21 might incur as a result of the past contamination.

Another eight years later, the site still had not been fully remediated. Route 21 decided to enter an agreement with NJDEP under the New Jersey Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act. (Brownfield laws can provide more streamlined processes for site cleanup, sometimes with public financial support, where the contamination does not present an acute threat, and where faster cleanup may facilitate a return of the property to productive use in the community.) Under the brownfields agreement developed for this site, Route 21 provided a good faith estimate of the remediation costs, and agreed to do the remediation itself in accordance with NJDEP guidance. The agreement then provided for reimbursement by NJDEP of 75 percent of Route 21's remediation costs. This agreement became an addendum to Route 21's earlier agreement with MHC's predecessor, and MHC agreed to reimburse Route 21 for the remaining 25 percent of the remediation costs. MHC further agreed to maintain groundwater monitoring wells which had been installed at the site, and to sign certifications required by the disposal sites receiving the wastes produced by the cleanup. Finally, there was a provision in the modified agreement requiring MHC to complete groundwater remediation if the site was sold to the Lowe's home improvement store chain (such a sale never happened).

Just over a year after these new agreements were finalized, MHC and its related entities entered voluntary bankruptcy under Chapter 11. Route 21 filed a proof of claim against the debtor's estate seeking over a million dollars, constituting MHC's share of the costs incurred in the remediation. NJDEP also filed a claim seeking to recover costs to be incurred at this and other sites contaminated by the debtor, MHC. The court-appointed trustee, on behalf of the debtor, objected to the claims. Route 21 then filed cross-claims against the debtor seeking specific performance of the agreements.

The bankruptcy judge denied the claims for specific performance, holding that they were executory contracts which had been rejected by the debtor. The judge also denied Route 21's claim that it was entitled to administrative priority because the agreements were entered into prior to the bankruptcy petition and did not provide a direct benefit to the debtor's post-petition estate. As for Route 21's claim for remediation costs already incurred and for future costs, the judge allowed the incurred costs as an unsecured claim, but disallowed claims for future remediation costs under section 502(e)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code as contingent claims of a co-liable party.

On appeal to the District Court, the bankruptcy judge's ruling was upheld in all respects. The District Court agreed with the bankruptcy court's conclusion that MHC's agreements regarding remediation of the site were executory because of the ongoing obligations on both sides, and contingencies such as the sale to Lowe's. Significantly, the court also based its decision on the positions taken by both parties that the agreements were executory; Route 21 was bound by its prior position. The District Court held that the debtor's plan of reorganization, which deemed all executory contracts to be rejected, served as sufficient rejection of MHC's site remediation agreements with Route 21, and specific performance therefore was not warranted. The District Court also rejected Route 21's arguments that specific performance is injunctive relief which may not be addressed and discharged as a claim. This argument was based on cases involving clean-up injunctions sought by environmental agencies; because this case involved an agreement between private entities, not one between a polluter and a government agency, Route 21 did not meet the criteria for that argument. The District Court likewise rejected Route 21's argument that its claim for specific performance could not be rejected because it was an equitable remedy; the court concluded that the claim could be monetized and that monetary claim would be an acceptable substitute for specific performance in the bankruptcy context.

The District Court next agreed with the bankruptcy judge's conclusion that Route 21's claims were not entitled to administrative priority for the Route 21 claims (which would grant recovery of the actual amounts expended). The claims were the result of agreements entered into before the debtor filed its bankruptcy petition, and giving them priority would not further the purposes of granting such priority, which are to encourage entities to do business with a post-petition debtor, or preserve assets needed to continue the business. Addressing Route 21's claim for reimbursement of remediation costs not yet incurred, the District Court held that such future costs were contingent claims and thus rightfully rejected by the bankruptcy court. Route 21 admitted its liability in prosecuting its claims. As a self-admitted co-liable party, it is not entitled to recover contingent costs which it is obligated to pay whether or not the debtor can contribute. Moreover, the court noted that the State of New Jersey had already recovered much of the costs, and the Bankruptcy Code prevents the unfairness to other creditors which would result from any double recovery on claims.

The District Court's opinion concludes with a brief discussion of the fairness of an outcome that relieves MHC of nearly all of the cleanup responsibility for the site: "That outcome may seem harsh, but it treats Route 21 no worse than the debtor's other unsecured creditors, who equally are left holding the bag in the wake of the debtor's bankruptcy."

Private parties entering into remediation and monitoring agreements with former landowners should bear in mind that any obligations agreed to by the former landowners may be discharged should the obligated party enter bankruptcy, and those claims may not be allowed priority over any others in the bankruptcy proceeding. Moreover, the case points out that the characterization of an environmental claim, its framing and presentation, may be done in a variety of ways due to the many overlapping state and federal environmental laws that may govern a site. Careful framing of the claim and a consistent presentation may be extremely important to the final determination on the claim. Given the superior position enjoyed by government agencies in the exercise of the police power, it may also be important to try to work with the government to achieve the maximum recovery from the debtor's estate by presenting the best combination of government enforcement and private claims. A well-prepared and well-presented set of claims and other requested relief may convince the trustee or debtor-in possession to negotiate a settlement which provides better relief than the court may award, thus avoiding the risk of a judgment that allows a full cost recovery.

Footnote

1. No. 12 Civ. 5361 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2012) available at http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13326300006223547217&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr.

www.schnader.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions