United States: Ninth Circuit Strengthens Pleading Standard In Section 11 Claims: In Re Century Aluminum Co. Securities Litigation

On January 2, 2013, the Ninth Circuit provided additional support for an increasingly vigorous application of the Twombly/Iqbal pleading standard.1 In In re Century Aluminum Co. Securities Litigation,2 the Ninth Circuit applied the Twombly/Iqbal pleading standard to the tracing element of “aftermarket” purchasers in connection with a claim brought under Section 11 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933.3 The Ninth Circuit’s decision marks the first time a circuit court has applied the Twombly/Iqbal standard to the tracing element, significantly heightening the level of factual specificity required in aftermarket purchasers’ claims. The decision indicates an increasing willingness to dismiss claims that require a court to draw unreasonable inferences or accept speculative conclusions from allegations in a complaint.

Under Section 11, any person who buys a security issued under a materially false or misleading registration statement may bring a claim against the issuer of that security. A plaintiff has standing to sue provided he or she either (1) purchased shares in the offering made under the misleading registration statement, or (2) purchased shares in the aftermarket that are traceable back to the relevant offering. Century Aluminum involved the latter scenario.

The Century Aluminum plaintiffs alleged that the company’s prospectus supplement, issued in connection with a secondary offering of 24.5 million shares, contained false and misleading information in violation of Section 11. The plaintiffs conceded that they had purchased shares in the aftermarket rather than directly in the secondary offering. The complaint did not set forth specific facts showing the securities were traceable to the allegedly misleading registration statement, but rather relied on a general allegation that plaintiffs had “purchased Century Aluminum common stock directly traceable to the Company’s Secondary Offering.”4 The trial court dismissed the complaint, finding that the presence of 49 million shares in the market prior to the secondary offering made the plaintiffs’ general allegations insufficient as a matter of law. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit affirmed, finding that the Twombly/Iqbal pleading standard required plaintiffs to make factual allegations “tending to exclude . . . the alternative explanation” that the plaintiffs’ purchased shares came from the already existing pool.5

On review, the Ninth Circuit began by noting that when a company has issued shares under more than one registration statement, a plaintiff seeking to proceed under Section 11 must “prove that her shares were issued under the allegedly false or misleading registration statement, rather than some other registration statement.”6 This standard requires plaintiffs who purchased in the aftermarket to trace the chain of title for their shares back to the secondary offering. As the court recognized, the tracing requirement is “often impossible” for aftermarket purchasers to meet.7

Turning to the Twombly/Iqbal pleading standard, the Ninth Circuit explained that a complaint’s allegations, at a minimum, must suggest the claim has a plausible chance of success. Specifically, “the complaint must allege factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.”8 This requires the exclusion of any “obvious alternative explanations.”9 In the case before it, the Ninth Circuit reasoned that the complaint was deficient because the plaintiffs’ allegations were consistent with their shares not only having come from the secondary offering but also from the pool of previously issued shares.10 To succeed, the court determined, the plaintiffs would have had to allege specific facts excluding the possibility that their purchased shares came from the already existing pool.

The Ninth Circuit also addressed allegations that shares purchased by one of the named plaintiffs, Peter Abrams, were traceable because Abrams had directed his broker to purchase shares from the secondary offering. The complaint alleged that Abrams’s broker had purchased shares from Citigroup, which was in a joint venture with one of the underwriters of the secondary offering. Finding even these allegations insufficient, the court stated that Citigroup could have filled the order with shares from the secondary offering or from previously issued shares it was holding. Consistent with its determination as to the general allegations of tracing, the Ninth Circuit determined that allegations regarding Abrams’s purchases were insufficient without fact-specific allegations excluding the latter possibility, “such as an allegation that Citigroup held only shares issued in the secondary offering.”11

The Ninth Circuit’s determination that the Twombly/Iqbal pleading standard requires factually specific allegations of tracing squarely contradicts the decisions of a few district courts. In recent cases, the District of Maryland and the Southern District of New York have each applied the Twombly/Iqbal standard to aftermarket purchasers’ Section 11 claims.12 Both courts upheld complaints alleging only that plaintiffs purchased shares “pursuant and/or traceable to” the relevant registration statement(s), finding that such general allegations satisfy the Twombly/Iqbal standard.13 However, both courts’ determinations rested, in large part, on pre-Twombly/Iqbal case law and the lack of any authority requiring fact-specific allegations of tracing.14 The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Century Aluminum suggests a different outcome may result in these jurisdictions’ future decisions.

Authority from other circuit courts suggests that they may follow the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning and require factually specific allegations that purchased shares are traceable to the public offering at issue. For example, in a Section 11 case decided before the Supreme Court established the Twombly/Iqbal standard, the Fifth Circuit reasoned that aftermarket purchasers’ allegations must show more than a “very high” statistical probability that their shares are traceable to the relevant offering.15 Although the Fifth Circuit has yet to apply the Twombly/Iqbal standard to Section 11 claims, this early authority suggests that court may find Century Aluminum persuasive.

The Century Aluminum decision alters the Section 11 landscape by making it more difficult for aftermarket purchasers to successfully assert claims. The Ninth Circuit’s statement, “that when a company has offered shares under more than one registration statement, aftermarket purchasers usually will not be able to trace their shares,”16 effectively creates a rebuttable presumption against traceability. Thus, for plaintiffs’ allegations to survive a motion to dismiss, they must rebut the Ninth Circuit’s presumption with factually specific information – a difficult pre-discovery standard for any plaintiff to meet.


1 The Twombly/Iqbal pleading standard is the result of two cases which moved federal courts away from a system of pure notice pleading. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009). Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly determined that a complaint must be plausible in order to survive a motion to dismiss. 550 U.S. at 556-57. Ashcroft v. Iqbal determined that “plausibility” requires “factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” 556 U.S. at 678.

2 No. 11-15599, 2013 WL 11887 (9th Cir. Jan. 2, 2013).

3 15 U.S.C. § 77.

4 In re Century Aluminum, 2013 WL 11887, at *2.

5 Id. at *3.

6 Id. at *1 (citing Hertzberg v. Dignity Partners, Inc., 191 F.3d 1076, 1080 n.4 (9th Cir. 1999)).

7 Id. (quoting Barnes v. Osofsky, 373 F.2d 269, 271-72 (2d Cir. 1967)).

8 Id. at *2 (citing Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678).

9 Id. at *3.

10 Id.

11 Id. (emphasis in original).

12 See In re Mun. Mortgage & Equity, LLC, Sec. & Deriv. Litig., 876 F. Supp. 2d 616 (D. Md. 2012); In re Wachovia Equity Sec. Litig., 753 F. Supp. 2d 326, 372-73 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).

13 In re Mun. Mortgage & Equity, LLC, 876 F. Supp. 2d at 657; see In re Wachovia Equity, 753 F. Supp. 2d at 372-73 (upholding complaint alleging that “Plaintiffs purchased securities pursuant or traceable to Offering Materials that contained material misstatements and omissions of fact” (internal citations omitted)).

14 See In re Wachovia Equity, 753 F. Supp. 2d at 373 (“Although the . . . Defendants assert that there is no set of facts under which Plaintiffs could trace the notes purchased to the Supplemental Offerings, they supply no binding authority for the proposition that anything more is required to plead a Section 11 claim.” (internal citations omitted)).

15 Krim v. pcOrder.com, Inc., 402 F.3d 489, 496 (5th Cir. 2005); see Cozzarelli v. Inspire Pharms. Inc., 549 F.3d 618, 628 (4th Cir. 2008) (stating that “we have serious doubts that plaintiffs even ‘nudged [their Section 11] claims across the line from conceivable to plausible,’” but upholding dismissal of complaint based on rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure).

16 In re Century Aluminum, 2013 WL 11887, at *2 (emphasis in original).

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions