In fiscal year 2012 a total of 2,787 whistleblower complaints – the largest number to date – were filed with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), according to newly released data published on the agency’s Whistleblower Protection Program webpage. OSHA enforces the whistleblower provisions in 22 statutes, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), Affordable Care Act, and the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act.
Most of the whistleblower charges (1,706) were filed under the OSH Act. The next most common claims were filed under the whistleblower provisions of the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA) (353 complaints); Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) (334 complaints); and the SOX Act (164 complaints).
The agency made determinations in 2,867 whistleblower complaints during this time. More than half (1,665) of these determinations were complaint dismissals, while another 592 cases were settled. A total of 565 charges were withdrawn in FY 2012. OSHA issued merit determinations in only 45 complaints.
Over the past year OSHA has issued a number of regulations setting forth procedures for handling retaliation complaints under the whistleblower provisions of several statutes, and has created a 15-member Whistleblower Protection Advisory Committee (WPAC) to make recommendations to improve efficiency and effectiveness of the agency’s Whistleblower Protection Program. The first meeting of the WPAC is scheduled for Tuesday, January 29, 2013.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
As our readers know, federal and state departments of labor have intensified their scrutiny of independent contractor arrangements and are coordinating with the federal and state taxing authorities when misclassifications are found.
Courts often conclude that absent appropriate disclaimer language and statements in employee handbooks are "promises" to employees, binding employers to abide by these promises in their dealings with employees.
Employers sometimes rely on equitable arguments, such as "unclean hands" (which asserts that it would not be fair to hold an employer liable when the employee’s actions caused or contributed to his own injury or damages).