United States: Fifth Circuit Crafts New Test For Foreign Debtor Relief

Last Updated: January 16 2013
Article by John J. Rapisardi, Audrey Aden Doline and Casey J. Servais

Most Read Contributor in United States, October 2018

On Nov. 28, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in In re Vitro S.A.B. de C.V.1 issued a groundbreaking decision under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides the mechanics for U.S. bankruptcy courts to deal with cross-border insolvency proceedings. Although deference to judgments of foreign courts is the norm under Chapter 15, in this instance the Fifth Circuit refused to enforce a court-approved Mexican plan of reorganization on the ground that it contained non-consensual non-debtor releases of noteholders' claims against the debtor's non-debtor subsidiaries. Unlike the bankruptcy court below, the Fifth Circuit did not hold that non-consensual non-debtor releases are "manifestly contrary" to U.S. public policy. Instead, the court held that such releases could theoretically be approved in Chapter 15 cases, but only upon a showing of the same type of "exceptional circumstances" that are deemed to justify such releases in U.S.-based cases under Chapter 11.

The Fifth Circuit also developed an impressive new analytical framework for interpreting and reconciling the various provisions of Chapter 15. If adopted by courts in other jurisdictions, the Fifth Circuit's systematic approach to the application of Chapter 15 could prove even more influential than the specific holdings of the case.

Statutory Background

Chapter 15, which was first added to the Bankruptcy Code in 2005, authorizes U.S. bankruptcy courts to assist foreign debtors who are the subject of insolvency proceedings in foreign courts. Section 1521 of the Bankruptcy Code sets forth in detail certain types of relief U.S. bankruptcy courts are authorized to provide to such foreign debtors, including entrusting the distribution of all or part of a foreign debtor's assets located in the United States to the foreign debtor's representative.2 A bankruptcy court may grant these specific forms of relief only if the interests of creditors are sufficiently protected, however.3

A broader provision, Section 1507, authorizes U.S. bankruptcy courts to provide "additional assistance" beyond that expressly authorized in Section 1521. Section 1507 requires a bankruptcy court to consider a series of factors before granting such additional assistance, one of which is whether the assistance will assure a distribution of the debtor's property substantially in accordance with the order prescribed by the Bankruptcy Code.4

Finally, Section 1506 creates a "public policy" exception that limits a bankruptcy court's obligation to grant relief under Sections 1521 or 1507. Specifically, Section 1506 provides that a bankruptcy court may refuse to take an action to assist a foreign debtor if that action would be "manifestly contrary" to the public policy of the United States.


Vitro S.A.B. de C.V. is a corporation organized under the laws of Mexico and one of the world's largest glass manufacturers. On Dec. 13, 2010, Vitro commenced a voluntary judicial reorganization proceeding in a Mexican federal court pursuant to Mexico's business reorganization act, the Ley de Concursos Mercantiles. Soon after, Vitro also filed a Chapter 15 petition in the United States. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas subsequently recognized Vitro's Mexican insolvency proceeding as a foreign main proceeding, making Vitro eligible for relief under Chapter 15. Significantly, although Vitro's subsidiaries had guaranteed almost all of Vitro's debt, most of these subsidiaries were not debtors in either the U.S. or the Mexican proceedings.

On Feb. 3, 2012, the Mexican court entered an order approving a plan of reorganization purporting to extinguish the guarantees of Vitro's non-debtor subsidiaries. Notwithstanding the Mexican plan's release provisions, certain Vitro noteholders proceeded with efforts to enforce the non-debtor subsidiary guarantees in various courts located in the United States. Consequently, Vitro's Chapter 15 foreign representative filed a motion in the Bankruptcy Court requesting that the court give full force and effect to the Mexican plan by enjoining any future attempts to enforce the non-debtor subsidiary guarantees in the United States.

The Bankruptcy Court refused to enforce Vitro's plan, holding that the relief Vitro requested was not available under Section 1521 because it did not sufficiently protect creditors' interests. Enforcement was also not available under Section 1507 because the plan did not assure a distribution substantially in accordance with the order of priority prescribed by the Bankruptcy Code. Finally, the Bankruptcy Court found that Section 1506's public policy exception applied because the plan's non-consensual non-debtor releases were "manifestly contrary" to U.S. public policy as embodied in Fifth Circuit case law, which interprets the Bankruptcy Code to prohibit bankruptcy discharges for non-debtors.

Vitro asked the Fifth Circuit to undertake an expedited review of a single issue—namely, whether the Bankruptcy Court had erred as a matter of law when it refused to enforce Vitro's Mexican plan based solely on its non-debtor release provisions.

The Decision

The Fifth Circuit began its analysis by emphasizing the centrality of "comity" in the context of Chapter 15. The U.S. Supreme Court classically defined this concept as the "recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation."5 Because of Chapter 15's emphasis on comity, the relief requested by a foreign representative in a Chapter 15 proceeding does not need to be identical to the relief that would be available under U.S. law. Nonetheless, the Fifth Circuit also emphasized that Chapter 15 does place certain limitations on comity, including those that the Bankruptcy Court identified with respect to Sections 1521 and 1507. Because the parties disagreed about which of these provisions was applicable to Vitro's requested relief, and because the relationship between these provisions was "not entirely clear," the Fifth Circuit proposed a new, three-step framework for applying the provisions in conjunction with other relevant provisions of Chapter 15.

In the first step of the Fifth Circuit's new framework, a court must consider whether the relief requested by a foreign representative falls into one of the enumerated categories in Section 1521. The Fifth Circuit based this approach on a standard canon of statutory interpretation that dictates that specific terms prevail over general terms. Applying this analysis to the facts before it, the Fifth Circuit determined that it could not order enforcement of Vitro's plan under Section 1521's specific provisions, because a discharge of non-debtor obligations was not one of the specifically enumerated forms of relief.

In the second step, a court must look not at the specific forms of relief enumerated in Section 1521, but rather at general language in Section 1521(a) which states that, at the request of a Chapter 15 foreign representative, a court may grant "any appropriate relief." The legislative history of Section 1521 indicates that the Section was intended neither to expand nor reduce the scope of relief previously available under the statute it replaced, former Bankruptcy Code Section 304, and the Fifth Circuit thus concluded that the appropriate question at this stage of the analysis is whether the requested relief had previously been granted under Section 304. In addition, a court must consider whether the requested relief would otherwise be available under U.S. law.

Applying this analysis, the Fifth Circuit concluded that Section 1521(a)'s "any appropriate relief" language did not provide a basis to enforce Vitro's plan, because there was no precedent for the enforcement of a non-debtor discharge under old Section 304 and Fifth Circuit precedent interprets the Bankruptcy Code as prohibiting such a discharge.

The Fifth Circuit emphasized that a court may move on to the third step of its analysis only if the relief a foreign representative is requesting goes beyond the relief previously available under old Section 304 or currently available under U.S. law. In other words, Section 1507 functions as a "catch-all" that provides for forms of relief "more extraordinary" than those permitted under either the specific or the general provisions of Section 1521. Unlike the Bankruptcy Court, the Fifth Circuit suggested that Section 1507 could theoretically allow for non-consensual non-debtor releases as one such form of extraordinary relief. Nonetheless, the Fifth Circuit remarked that the "devil [was] in the details," and concluded that a non-consensual release was not appropriate under the facts of Vitro's case. For one thing, the Bankruptcy Court had correctly concluded that such a release would not provide for a distribution substantially in accordance with the order of priority prescribed by the Bankruptcy Code.6 Furthermore, the Fifth Circuit suggested that extraordinary relief under Section 1507 was available only under appropriately extraordinary circumstances, and that Vitro had failed to show the existence of such extraordinary circumstances in its case.

At the conclusion of its analysis, the Fifth Circuit briefly addressed the Bankruptcy Court's holding that non-consensual non-debtor releases are contrary to U.S. public policy under Section 1506. Because the Fifth Circuit had already ruled that neither Section 1521 nor Section 1507 allowed for non-consensual non-debtor releases under the facts of this case, the Fifth Circuit found it unnecessary to actually decide the public policy question. It did, however, express some skepticism about the Bankruptcy Court's holding on this issue. Notably, although non-consensual non-debtor releases are prohibited in the Fifth Circuit, some other U.S. jurisdictions permit them under exceptional circumstances. Based on this fact, the Fifth Circuit observed that it would be difficult to maintain that such releases are "manifestly contrary" to the public policy of the United States as a whole.


In its well-reasoned Vitro decision, the Fifth Circuit managed to preserve the most important aspects of the Bankruptcy Court's earlier opinion, while simultaneously placing the Bankruptcy Court's rulings on a firmer factual and jurisprudential foundation. To reach its conclusion, the Fifth Circuit balanced the competing interests at play when considering the applicability of controversial relief in the plans of the foreign debtors. On the one hand, there is the key Chapter 15 consideration of respecting foreign law and foreign judgments. On the other hand, Chapter 15 allows U.S. courts to limit their grant of comity to the extent foreign law or foreign judgments contradict the values embodied in U.S. law.

In this instance, the Fifth Circuit balanced comity against the values of U.S. law by holding that non-debtor releases approved by foreign courts might be enforced under Chapter 15, but only under circumstances similar to those under which they would be enforced in the United States.

Ultimately, the Bankruptcy Court's controversial finding that non-consensual non-debtor releases are "manifestly contrary" to U.S. public policy proved questionable in light of the fact that such releases are tolerated under some circumstances in some U.S. jurisdictions. While acknowledging this reality, the Fifth Circuit nonetheless emphasized the rare and extraordinary nature of such releases, sending an important signal to lenders, investors, and the capital markets generally that non-debtor release provisions are as unlikely to be enforced under Chapter 15 as under the other sections of the Bankruptcy Code.

Beyond this specific holding, the Fifth Circuit's Vitro decision is likely to become a landmark in Chapter 15 jurisprudence because it provides other courts with a systematic, step-by-step approach to applying Chapter 15's key relief provisions.


Chapter 15 will become ever more important as the U.S. economy becomes increasingly intertwined with the global economy, and the Vitro case provides fascinating insight into the difficult balancing act that Chapter 15 requires of U.S. bankruptcy courts. Furthermore, the specific fact pattern in Vitro provides a valuable benchmark—where there previously were few—for determining the kinds of foreign plan provisions that may or may not be held enforceable in the United States. It will be interesting to see if and how other courts adapt Vitro's framework for interpreting controversial foreign plan provisions under Chapter 15.


1. Vitro S.A.B. de C.V. v. Ad Hoc Group of Vitro Noteholders, (In re Vitro S.A.B. de C.V.), No. 12-10542, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24443 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2012).

2. See 11 U.S.C. §1521(b).

3. See 11 U.S.C. §§1521(b), 1522(a).

4. See id. §1521(b)(4).

5. Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113, 164 (1895).

6. See 11 U.S.C. §1507(b)(4).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions