NB. This article is not published yet. Please try again later.
More Popular Related Articles on Intellectual Property from USA
On March 18, 2016, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District of Delaware's ruling in two companion cases that West Virginia-based defendant Mylan Pharmaceuticals is subject to specific personal jurisdiction in Delaware.
Foley Hoag LLP
Last year, I made a terrible mistake. When I published Harry Potter Lawsuits and Where to Find Them on this blog, I pronounced that "Ms. Rowling and her works pop up in court more than any author...
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
In almost every U.S. patent suit, the patentee's counsel considers how the case could have been facilitated had the patent at issue been drafted and prosecuted differently.
On April 4, 2016, the Senate unanimously passed the Defend Trade Secrets Act, bringing a federal civil remedy for trade secret misappropriation one step closer to becoming law.
Hunton & Williams
In last year's issue of our Patent Damages Year in Review, we highlighted three important decisions from the Federal Circuit: VirnetX v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc. and Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Earlier today (by a vote of 503 to 131 with 18 abstentions), the European Parliament approved the text of a proposed Directive for the protection of trade secrets in the European Union.
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
Oracle sued Google six years ago, claiming that Google needs a license to use parts of the Java platform in Google's Android operating system.
Brinks Gilson & Lione
Suggestions to amend or abolish 35 U.S.C. § 101 of the Patent Act are increasing in light of the number of software and biological patents invalidated after the Supreme Court's Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014) and Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc., 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012) decisions, which have been used aggressively to challenge the subject matter eligibility of patents.