The IRS has issued a private letter ruling (PLR 201249013)
revoking a ruling issued earlier this year related to the cost of
facility-specific power purchase agreements (PPAs).
In the original ruling (PLR 201214007), the IRS concluded that a
taxpayer acquiring wind energy facilities subject to
facility-specific PPAs could not allocate any portion of the
purchase price to the PPAs. Instead, the IRS concluded that any
purchase price attributed to the PPAs should be included in the
basis of the related energy property.
Section 167(a) provides that there should be allowed as a
depreciation deduction a reasonable allowance for the exhaustion,
wear and tear, and obsolescence of property used in the trade or
business, or in the production of income. In addition, Section
167(c)(2), provides that if property is acquired subject to a
lease, no portion of the adjusted basis is allocated to the
leasehold interest, and the entire adjusted basis is taken into
account in determining the depreciation deduction (if any) related
to the property subject to the lease. In the original ruling, the
IRS applied Section 167(c)(2) to the PPAs because the taxpayer
represented that the PPAs were facility specific and could not be
fulfilled from other sources. Based on the taxpayer's
representations, the IRS applied Section 167(c)(2) and concluded
that no portion of the purchase price should be allocated to the
PPAs. Instead, the purchase price of the wind energy facility that
is attributed to the PPAs should be included in the adjusted basis
of the wind energy facility.
After issuing the original ruling, the IRS determined that PLR
201214007 is inconsistent with its current views. After
reconsideration, the IRS has reached the opposite conclusion,
ruling that the portion of the purchase price paid by the taxpayer
that is attributable to the PPAs should be allocated to the PPAs
and not to the wind energy facilities.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The favoured tax status of foreigners planning not to stay in the UK on a long term basis (so called 'non-doms') became a hot topic in the run up to the UK General Election in May 2015, and one of George Osborne's early acts as Chancellor was to announce changes to the regime.
Many are aware that the principal income tax consequences of
expatriation are usually immediate – under the
‘mark-to-market' regime, a ‘covered
expatriate' is generally deemed to sell all of his property,
regardless of its location, on the day before he ceases to be
taxable as a US resident.
We hope you've enjoyed receiving our weekly Tax Policy Update. Our McGuireWoods Tax Policy Team is dedicated to providing our clients with up-to-the-minute information, unique insights, and detailed analysis of tax policy developments.
On November 2, 2015, President Obama signed the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (the "Bill"), which repeals the TEFRA Unified Audit Procedures and replaces them with a radically modified "corporate" model for partnership tax audits.