ARTICLE
3 October 2012

Know Where You Stand With Jointly Owned And Licensed Patent Rights

GP
Goodwin Procter LLP

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
Many tech start-ups license in their seed technology from academic or research institutions.
United States Intellectual Property

Many tech start-ups license in their seed technology from academic or research institutions. They also often collaborate with others to develop new technology, under joint development agreements that can dictate newly developed inventions will be jointly owned by the parties.

Regardless of the path or circumstances, when the interests of joint owners or licensor/licensee are aligned, it's easy sailing. But when the parties' interests diverge, you want to be sure you know where you stand legally.

The language of a properly drafted license or development agreement defines each party's rights and responsibilities under the contract. One area to pay particular attention to is who will take the lead in prosecuting the patent rights and what rights the other party has to participate in the process.

As a licensee or joint owner, when you take the lead in patent prosecution, your patent attorney may have certain obligations to the other party. For example, a power of attorney from the other party may be required. This can establish a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the other party. And, in some circumstances, both parties can be clients of the patent attorney. Despite both parties executing conflicts of interest waivers, the joint representation entails all of the ethical obligations an attorney has to each client. A falling out of the parties can result in the patent attorney being unable to represent either party in the ongoing patent work and in the related dispute.

Managing the parties' contractual relationship at the outset, for example by avoiding joint ownership obligations of newly developed IP, can be helpful, but won't necessarily address all contingencies. What is important is to have a clear understanding with your patent attorney as to her role from the very start, so that foreseeable problems can be avoided.

Goodwin Procter LLP is one of the nation's leading law firms, with a team of 700 attorneys and offices in Boston, Los Angeles, New York, San Diego, San Francisco and Washington, D.C. The firm combines in-depth legal knowledge with practical business experience to deliver innovative solutions to complex legal problems. We provide litigation, corporate law and real estate services to clients ranging from start-up companies to Fortune 500 multinationals, with a focus on matters involving private equity, technology companies, real estate capital markets, financial services, intellectual property and products liability.

This article, which may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions, is provided with the understanding that it does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Goodwin Procter LLP or its attorneys. © 2012 Goodwin Procter LLP. All rights reserved.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More