United States: New York Appellate Division, First Department: Not Every Plaintiff Asserting A Discrimination Claim Under The New York City Human Rights Law Will Be Entitled To Reach A Jury

On May 29, 2012, a divided panel of New York's Appellate Division, First Department, announced a decision that should help employers facing claims under the exceptionally broad New York City Human Rights Law ("NYCHRL") to obtain summary judgment and curb the number of unfounded claims that reach a jury. In Melman v. Montefiore Medical Center, 2012 NY Slip Op. 04111 (May 29, 2012), the appellate panel affirmed an award of summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It found that plaintiff Arnold Melman ("Melman"), head of the urology department at Montefiore Medical Center ("Montefiore"), had failed, under both the federal McDonnell Douglas test and the "mixed motive" test, to establish a triable issue of fact over whether he was treated differently by the hospital because of his age. The court found that, notwithstanding the intended broad reading of the NYCHRL in favor of employment discrimination claims, Melman's contentions were based on weak, defective, or nonexistent evidence. Therefore, they were insufficient to rebut the legitimate and nondiscriminatory reasons set forth by Montefiore or to show that age was a motivating factor for the hospital's treatment of Melman.


Melman brought suit against Montefiore in 2007 in the Bronx County Supreme Court, asserting causes of action for age discrimination and retaliation under the NYCHRL. Melman, at the time 66-years-old, alleged that because of his age, and despite his distinguished record, Montefiore undercompensated him compared to physicians in comparable positions in other hospitals and younger physicians in his department. Melman also claimed that Montefiore denied his requests for raises or gave him inadequate increases and awarded him insufficient bonuses. He further alleged that Montefiore had been limiting his control over the department and generally treated him with "perceived disrespect" because of his age.

The trial court (Friedlander, J.), finding no triable issue of fact as to whether Melman was treated adversely because of his age, granted Montefiore's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case. Melman appealed the dismissal, arguing that Montefiore had failed to meet its burden of establishing that it had legitimate and non-discriminatory reasons for its employment decisions and that he had presented sufficient evidence to go to trial on his claim.

The Court's Ruling

Following the First Department's December 2011 decision in Bennett v. Health Management Systems, Justice David Friedman, writing for the majority, observed that the court was required to apply two analyses when considering a summary judgment motion in discrimination cases based on circumstantial evidence brought under the NYCHRL: (i) the three-step burden-shifting test set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the seminal civil rights case McDonnell Douglas Corp v. Green; and (ii) a less stringent "mixed motive" test.

Under the familiar McDonnell Douglas framework, a plaintiff has the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of discrimination. If the plaintiff is successful, the burden shifts to the employer to provide, using admissible evidence, legitimate, independent, and nondiscriminatory reasons that supported its employment decisions. If the employer satisfies its burden, the burden shifts back to the plaintiff who must show that the proffered reasons were a "pretext" for discrimination.

Melman argued on appeal that he had established a prima facie claim of discrimination under the McDonnell Douglas framework and that Montefiore had failed to satisfy its burden of demonstrating that it had non-discriminatory reasons for its actions. The court rejected Melman's argument, finding that Montefiore had successfully proffered a number of legitimate and non-discriminatory reasons for its actions towards Melman. Among the reasons the hospital cited were complaints filed against Melman with state authorities for improper billing and deficient record-keeping, and a gradual decline in Melman's performance and contribution to Montefiore's revenue. This satisfied Montefiore's burden.

Turning back to Melman's showing, the court found that he had failed to produce admissible evidence to show that Montefiore's reasons were a pretext for age discrimination. The majority rejected Melman's claim that age bias could be inferred from poor business decisions by Montefiore that ostensibly harmed Melman's practice, observing that questioning an employer's decision-making "as contrary to sound business or economic policy" does not support an inference that the decision was discriminatory. This long-established rule rests on the maxim that courts "should not sit as a super-personnel department that reexamines an entity's business decisions." Consequently, it is irrelevant if the employer supplies "a good reason, a bad reason, or a petty one," for its acts, provided the "stated reason ... was nondiscriminatory."

The court also rejected Melman's argument that a general discriminatory animus against older physicians — and thus against him — could be inferred from his unsubstantiated charge that older department chairs had been forced to leave their positions at Montefiore and were replaced by younger physicians. The court refused to "impose on Montefiore the additional burden of justifying its conduct in collateral matters involving nonparty former employees when plaintiff has established only that those employees may have been able to satisfy the minimal requirements of a prima facie case in lawsuits of their own." Thus, Melman was not permitted to paint the hospital's treatment of others as discriminatory and use it to satisfy his burden of proving pretext. The court concluded that Melman had failed to satisfy his evidentiary burden under the McDonnell Douglas test in order to avoid summary judgment.

The court also analyzed Melman's case under the "mixed motive" test as recent First Department precedent directed. Under that test, Melman only had to raise an issue of fact as to whether Montefiore was at least partially motivated by considerations of age in its treatment of him, even if Montefiore also had legitimate reasons to take action. Applying that test, the court found that Melman had failed to offer even circumstantial evidence that discrimination played any role in Montefiore's decisions. Accordingly, the court affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment. The court observed that despite the NYCHRL's "expansive goal of protecting victims from invidious discrimination ... not every plaintiff asserting a discrimination claim will be entitled to reach a jury."

The Significance of This Decision

In Melman, the majority makes clear that while the NYCHRL must be given the broad remedial reading the City Council intended it to have when it enacted the 2005 amendments, a claim will not survive summary judgment if the plaintiff does not present concrete evidence that the adverse action was motivated, at least in part, by discriminatory or retaliatory animus. Vague and conclusory statements concerning circumstantial facts are insufficient to satisfy this burden. This is a step towards alleviating employers' concerns that arose after the court's 2009 Williams and Phillips decisions.1 There the court held, without much guidance, that the NYCHRL was subject to "enhanced liberal constructions requirements" and was to be "construed independently from its state and federal counterparts in order to accomplish the statute's 'uniquely broad and remedial' purposes." Since Williams and Phillips, many plaintiffs employed in New York City have utilized the NYCHRL to bring discrimination claims. Those opinions, which directed that the NYCHRL was to be far more liberally construed than similar federal and state laws but which remained silent on where that liberalization ended, led many employers to share a perception that this law has few, if any, recognized limitations to restrain frivolous or near frivolous claims from reaching a jury. Through its holdings in Bennett and this case, the court has defined at least some limits to NYCHRL claims and may have moved the evidentiary standards for those claims slightly closer to the more familiar standards governing federal and state civil rights claims. However, employers still must be prepared for more judicial resistance to summary judgment and similar deference to the "uniquely broad and remedial purposes" of the NYCHRL when defending against claims brought under the law.


1. Williams v. New York City Hous. Auth., 61 A.D.3d 62 (1st Dep't 2009) and Phillips v. City of New York, 66 A.D.3d 170 (1st Dep't 2009).


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.