We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
"None, because she is paid at a piece-rate.":
(19 Votes, 33.9%)
"$25": (12 Votes, 21.4%)
"$20": (3 Votes, 5.4%)
One point we wanted to illustrate is that an employee is not
exempted from the federal Fair Labor Standards Act's
overtime-compensation requirements just because he or she is paid
at a piece-rate.
The key to the correct response lies in properly determining
Anne's "regular rate" of pay for purposes of
calculating the FLSA overtime compensation she is due. The
FLSA regular rate for a particular workweek is figured by dividing
the employee's total compensation for that workweek by the
total number of hours worked in that workweek for which the
compensation was paid. See, e.g., 29 C.F.R. §§ 778.109, 778.111.
So How Is Her FLSA Overtime Calculated?
In the hypothetical, Anne's straight-time compensation for
her 45 hours of work is (300 Devices × $1.50) = $450.
Therefore, her FLSA regular rate of pay is ($450 ÷ 45 Hrs.)
= $10.00 per hour. Her FLSA regular rate is higher than both
the $7.25-per-hour minimum wage and her $8.00-per-hour guaranteed
rate.
Her $450 in piece-rate pay represents the "one" of the
"one and one-half" overtime rate required by the FLSA, so
she must be paid additional half-time overtime premium at a rate of
($10.00 ÷ 2) = $5.00 per hour. Consequently, under the
FLSA, Anne is due for this workweek the sum of ($5.00 × 5 OT
Hrs.) = $25 in overtime premium pay, for total FLSA wages of ($450
+ $25) = $475. See, e.g., 29 C.F.R. § 778.111.
There Is Another Approach.
The FLSA authorizes an alternative way to figure piece-rate
overtime pay. FLSA Section 7(g)(1) permits the employer to do
this by paying at least 1.5 times the piece-rate(s) applicable to
the pieces or units produced during overtime hours.
Assume that Anne had assembled 270 devices in her first 40 hours
worked in the workweek and another 30 devices in her next five
hours worked in that workweek. If Anne's employer had
instead adopted the Section 7(g)(1) method of calculating her
overtime, her FLSA total gross wages would have been:
(270 Devices × $1.50) = $405 Wages For First 40 Hours
Among the requirements for using this alternative are that:
There must be an advance agreement or understanding with the
employee that this method will be used;
The piece-rate must be a bona fide one (that is, it is the rate
actually paid for the work when it is performed in non-overtime
hours);
The employee's average hourly earnings for the workweek
(not counting overtime premium pay and certain other amounts)
must come to at least the FLSA minimum wage;
The overtime compensation must come to at least 1.5 times the
minimum wage for the overtime hours worked;
The proper FLSA overtime compensation must also be paid on
other kinds of pay the employee receives (such as production
bonuses) that are includable in the regular rate.
Of course, employers must always take into account the
applicable requirements of different laws or the laws of other
jurisdictions, and it is especially important to ensure that other
such requirements permit this alternative.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
A female employee traveling for her employer met a "friend" and at her motel room with him became "injured whilst engaging in sexual intercourse when a glass light fitting above the bed was pulled from its mount and fell on her."
The Departments of Labor, Treasury, and Health & Human Services have issued new guidance on the content requirements for health plan summaries of benefits and coverage ("SBCs").
Groping, insulting, and threatening female employees has just resulted in an award by a federal jury in Tampa of $20.2 million in damages in an action which alleged a hostile work environment.