ARTICLE
21 June 2012

Philadelphia-Based Employee’s CEPA And NJLAD Claims Dismissed Even Though Employee Managed New Jersey Accounts, New Jersey District Court Rules

OD
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

Contributor

Ogletree Deakins is a labor and employment law firm representing management in all types of employment-related legal matters. Ogletree Deakins has more than 850 attorneys located in 53 offices across the United States and in Europe, Canada, and Mexico. The firm represents a range of clients, from small businesses to Fortune 50 companies.
n Papalini v. Sensient Colors, Inc., a Philadelphia-based account manager filed a complaint against her employer alleging sexual harassment under the NJLAD and retaliation under CEPA, which are both New Jersey statutes, as opposed to federal or Pennsylvania statutes.
United States Employment and HR

In Papalini v. Sensient Colors, Inc., a Philadelphia-based account manager filed a complaint against her employer alleging sexual harassment under the NJLAD and retaliation under CEPA, which are both New Jersey statutes, as opposed to federal or Pennsylvania statutes. Civ. No. 11-6392 (D.N.J. Apr. 18, 2012). The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, holding that the plaintiff's lone connection to New Jersey – the fact that as a regional account manager a significant portion of her accounts were in New Jersey – was insufficient to render her a New Jersey employee for purposes of protection under CEPA or the NJLAD.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More