United States: 2012 Venture Capital Report
Last Updated: June 11 2012
Article by David A. Westenberg

US MARKET REVIEW AND OUTLOOK

Market Review

In 2011, the venture capital market produced its heaviest deal flow in a decade, with total proceeds that rivaled the levels of 2007 and 2008, despite lingering economic uncertainty and poor capital market conditions in the late summer and early fall. Liquidity performance was also impressive, with a steady stream of VC-backed IPOs and the highest median acquisition price in VC-backed M&A transactions since the peak of the dot-com boom in 2000.

There were 3,209 reported venture capital financings raising total proceeds of $32.6 billion in 2011, compared to 3,033 financings that raised $29.6 billion in 2010. The number of financings in 2011 was the highest since 2001, when 3,381 deals were reported. Deal volumes were fairly level throughout 2011, producing quarterly totals of 754, 835, 817 and 803 transactions. Total proceeds in 2011 were nearly as high as the amounts raised in 2007 and 2008, before the global economic recession that curtailed investment activity. Once all transactions have been reported, financing proceeds in 2011 are likely to represent the largest annual tally since 2001.

The median size of all venture capital financings increased from $4.4 million in 2010 to $5.0 million in 2011, reversing three consecutive annual declines, although the median financing size in 2011 was still lower than the figure for each year in the period from 1999 to 2008. The median financing size for life sciences companies increased from $5.0 million in 2010 to $6.0 million in 2011, its highest level since 2008. For information technology companies, the median financing size declined again, from $5.0 million to $4.7 million, representing the lowest median financing size since at least 1998. The steady decline in the median financing size for information technology companies partly reflects the ability of many technology companies to commence operations with lower levels of funding than historically required, due to various technological advances.

Amid strong competition for attractive deals, valuations of venture-backed companies increased sharply from 2010 to 2011. The median pre-money valuation for all venture financings was $21.0 million in 2011—the highest figure since 2000—compared to $17.0 million in 2010. Among life sciences companies, the median pre-money valuation nearly doubled, increasing from $13.1 million in 2010 to $24.8 million in 2011. Information technology companies saw a more modest increase in median pre-money valuation, from $11.2 million to $15.0 million.

Seed and first-round venture capital financings accounted for 42% of the total number of venture financings in 2011 (compared to 37% in 2010) and 18% of the total amount of venture capital investment (unchanged from the level in 2010). Seed and first-round financings have constituted between 29% and 42% of the total number of all venture financings in each year since 2001. The proportion of seed and first-round investing activity over the past decade, however, is significantly lower than the proportion prior to 2001. The increase in early-stage investing in 2011 reflects a reduction in the average time from initial funding to a liquidity event—which decreases the amount of money needed for investment in later-stage companies—as well as lower barriers to entry in certain technology sectors, resulting in an increase in the number of companies being formed and funded.

Venture capital investing by industry sector in 2011 was largely consistent with longer-term trends. Information technology companies represented 31% of all venture capital financings in 2011 (compared to 32% in 2010), while life sciences companies constituted 23% in 2011 (compared to 25% in 2010). In 2011, for the third consecutive year, the amount invested in life sciences companies ($8.4 billion) exceeded the amount invested in information technology companies ($7.9 billion).

The geographic breakdown for venture capital investing has remained fairly constant since 1996 (the first year for which this data is available). California— which has led the country in this regard in each year since 1996—accounted for 42% of all venture financings in 2011 (1,344 financings). Massachusetts, home to 10% of the companies receiving venture financing in 2011 (332 financings), again finished second in this category, as it has in each year since 1996, narrowly edging out New York, also with a 10% market share (317 financings). Texas (143 financings) and Pennsylvania (124 financings) rounded out the top five positions for 2011, concluding a repetition of the state rankings from 2010.

The IPO market remained receptive to VC-backed companies in 2011, continuing the recovery that began in 2010 after VC-backed IPOs all but disappeared for most of 2008 and 2009. In 2011, a total of 42 US venture-backed companies went public in the United States, down just one from the 43 in 2010. The largest VC-backed IPO of 2011 was the $1.0 billion offering by Zynga, followed by Groupon's $700 million IPO. The median amount of time from initial funding to an IPO was 6.5 years in 2011, down from 8.1 years in 2010 and the lowest since the 5.6-year median recorded in 2005.

The ratio of pre-IPO valuations to the median amount raised prior to IPO by venture-backed companies going public increased to 5.4:1 in 2011 from 4.1:1 in 2010—the second-highest level since 2000 (a higher ratio means higher returns to pre-IPO investors). This ratio was between 3.1:1 and 5.3:1 for each year from 2001 to 2008. In contrast, this ratio ranged from 7.7:1 to 10.0:1 from 1997 to 2000, due to very large pre-IPO valuations by younger companies, and spiked temporarily to 8.9:1 in 2009 based on a very small sample size of VC-backed IPOs that year.

The M&A market for venture-backed companies was favorable in 2011. Although the number of reported acquisitions of VC-backed companies declined from 560 in 2010 to 477 in 2011, purchase prices jumped, fueled by the availability of large cash balances by strategic buyers. The median acquisition price for venture-backed companies soared to $71 million in 2011 from $40 million in 2010. The median amount of time from initial funding to acquisition dipped to 5.3 years in 2011 from 5.4 years in the prior year—continuing a four-year trend of annual declines. With a shorter timeline to liquidity, the median amount raised prior to acquisition also declined in 2011—dropping from $19.4 million to $17.0 million.

The largest VC-backed company acquisition of 2011 was Plexxikon's acquisition by Daiichi Sankyo for $805 million (plus milestone payments of up to $130 million), followed by Ardian's acquisition by Medtronic for $800 million (plus milestone payments based on annual revenue growth). There were a total of 14 VC-backed company acquisitions for at least $500 million in 2011, compared to eight in the prior year.

The ratio of median acquisition price to median amount raised prior to acquisition was 4.2:1 in 2011, compared to 2.1:1 in 2010 and 1.3:1 in 2009 (a higher ratio means higher returns to pre-acquisition investors). The spike in this ratio in 2011 reflected the combination of very strong valuations and shorter time periods to acquisition. The 2011 ratio was the highest since the stratospheric ratio of 10.0:1 in 2000 at the height of the dot-com craze, when young companies routinely were acquired for outsized prices.

The above comparison of the ratios of valuations to the financing amounts required to achieve liquidity events indicates that returns to venture capital investors remain higher on IPOs than on M&A transactions. The higher valuations ascribed to IPO companies are offset, in part, by the fact that the median amount raised prior to liquidity event for M&A companies ($17.0 million in 2011) is generally much lower than the amount for IPO companies ($85.0 million in 2011), and the longer timelines from initial funding to liquidity for IPO companies (6.5 years in 2011) than for M&A companies (5.3 years in 2011). Moreover, venture investors generally achieve liquidity more rapidly in an M&A transaction (which frequently yields the bulk of the purchase price in cash at closing) than in an IPO (which generally involves a post-IPO lockup period of 180 days and market uncertainty on the timing and prices of subsequent sales).

The ratio of M&A transactions to IPOs for venture-backed companies was 11:1 in 2011 and 13:1 in 2010. Compared to the preceding two years, when this ratio was approximately five times higher, the results for 2010 and 2011 are close to historical norms. The M&A/IPO ratio for VC-backed exits was 10:1 during the period 2004–2007, 19:1 during the period 2001–2003, and less than 3:1 during the Internet boom of 1998–2000.

Outlook

The outlook for the venture capital market over the coming year is generally positive. Early results for 2012 bear out this optimism, although economic concerns and the continuing sovereign debt crisis in Europe could dampen expectations.

In the first quarter of 2012, venture capital investing was largely consistent with the comparable period of the prior year and overall trends in the marketplace, while liquidity outcomes improved further from the already positive results of 2011.

Approximately $6.3 billion was invested in 717 reported venture capital financings in the first quarter of 2012. These totals were lower than the reported amounts for the corresponding period of 2011, although the number of financings in the first quarter of 2012 should approach the prior year's figure once all financings have been reported. Final proceeds for the first quarter of 2012 will likely fall short of the corresponding figure from the first quarter of 2011, but the prior year's results were inflated by several extremely large financings by mature private companies.

The overall number of IPOs by venture-backed companies increased from 11 in the first quarter of 2011 to 20 in the first quarter of 2012, including prominent IPOs by several well-known companies. In May 2012, Facebook produced the largest VC-backed IPO in history— with $16.0 billion in proceeds.

Reported acquisition activity declined from 139 deals in the first quarter of 2011 to 94 deals in the first quarter of 2012, although delayed reporting probably explains much of the decrease in volume. The average acquisition price more than doubled, however, from $92 million to nearly $193 million, underscoring the willingness of strategic buyers to pay large amounts for attractive targets. The largest transaction of the first quarter of 2012 was the acquisition of Liberty Dialysis by Fresenius Medical Care for $1.7 billion. Subsequently, Facebook announced an agreement to acquire Instagram for $1 billon.

The level of venture capital financing activity over the balance of 2012 will be significantly affected by general economic conditions, investor confidence and the health of the IPO market for VC-backed companies.

Investor interest in the consumer Internet sector should remain strong, although valuations may undergo a correction from the recent levels that at times have seemed reminiscent of the dot-com era. Valuations in other sectors could also come under pressure if conditions in the economy at large and in the capital markets worsen.

The clean technology and renewable energy sector should benefit from heightened environmental awareness, the availability of government funding, and the long-term trend in rising energy prices. Problems with distribution, larger numbers of competing technologies, and the need in many cases for significantly larger investment amounts than in traditional VC-backed industries may cause some investors to approach this market cautiously.

Ongoing globalization in venture investing is likely to continue. International markets such as China, India and parts of Southeast Asia, as well as portions of Eastern Europe and South America, are spawning increased entrepreneurial activity and innovation, and the regulatory environments in those countries are also becoming more hospitable to foreign investment.

The liquidity outlook for VC-backed companies remains bright. On the heels of a very good IPO market for venture-backed companies in the preceding two years, deal flow picked up in the first quarter of 2012. In addition, the JOBS Act, enacted in early April, should encourage additional VC-backed companies to join an already robust pipeline of IPO candidates.

Prospects for the M&A market also appear promising. Strategic acquirers have excess cash to deploy, and the existence of a credible IPO alternative enhances the leverage of venture-backed companies in negotiating acquisition prices. Both the IPO and M&A markets could soften if the economy stagnates or extreme volatility returns to the capital markets.

REGIONAL MARKET REVIEW AND OUTLOOK

California

California companies reported 1,344 financings in 2011, up 10% from the 1,227 financings in 2010. After soaring to nearly $19 billion in 2010, proceeds declined 14% to $16.35 billion—still the second-highest total since 2000. Liquidity outcomes for California VC-backed companies were generally strong in 2011.

Roughly four times the size of the next-largest venture capital market in the United States, California was responsible for 42% of the nation's financing transactions in 2011. The year's deal tally was the largest ever achieved in

California, other than during the peak of the dot-com boom—in 2000, California produced a staggering 2,553 financings, with nearly $40 billion in proceeds. California's venture capital market spans all industry sectors, with particular strengths in consumer Internet, information technology, life sciences, cleantech, consumer retail and media/ entertainment. With a 41% market share, information technology was the largest sector in the state in 2011, followed by life sciences at 18%. California's best-known VC-backed companies are, of course, in social media.

The state generated 22 IPOs by VC-backed companies in 2011, compared to 19 in 2010. The number of reported acquisitions of California VC-backed companies declined from 274 in 2010 to 228 in 2011, but still surpassed any other year on record. In 2011, California produced three of the country's five largest VC-backed IPOs and the two largest venture-backed company acquisitions.

We expect California to maintain its venture capital leadership in the coming year. Future growth in financing activity and continued strength in liquidity will depend, in part, on general economic conditions, the willingness of strategic buyers to pay attractive premiums, and the overall health of the capital markets. Year-to-date liquidity highlights include Facebook's $16.0 billion IPO, Instagram's proposed acquisition for $1 billion (also by Facebook), and Efficient Frontier's $400 million acquisition by Adobe Systems.

Mid-Atlantic

The number of reported venture capital financings in the mid-Atlantic region of Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, Delaware and the District of Columbia increased 8%, from 163 in 2010 to 176 in 2011, while proceeds jumped 30%, from $1.48 billion to $1.92 billion—the highest level of proceeds since 2001. Although they do not rival the deal activity that prevailed between 1999 and 2001, annual tallies for venture capital financings and proceeds in the mid-Atlantic region remain above the levels seen in the pre-bubble years.

The percentage of all mid-Atlantic financings completed by information technology companies increased from 36% in 2010 to 39% in 2011. The region's life sciences sector—which had outpaced the information technology sector in 2009—saw its market share inch up from 29% to 30%.

After three VC-backed IPOs in 2010, the mid-Atlantic region produced only one IPO in 2011—Tranzyme's $54.0 million offering.

In contrast to the downturn in the region's IPO activity from 2010 to 2011, the number of reported acquisitions of mid-Atlantic VC-backed companies increased from 36 to 50. Virginia continued to lead the region in VC-backed M&A transactions in 2011, with 27 deals, followed by North Carolina with 11 and Maryland with nine. The region's largest M&A transaction of the year was the $650 million acquisition of TARGUSinfo by Neustar, followed in size by Open Text's acquisition of Metastorm for $182 million.

In the coming year, we expect that the mid-Atlantic region will remain a leading investment center for technology and life sciences companies and will spawn additional candidates to pursue IPOs. We also expect the region to continue to produce attractive acquisition candidates. Year-to-date liquidity highlights include BioReliance's acquisition by Sigma- Aldrich for $350 million and Millennial Media's IPO raising $132.6 million.

New England

New England companies reported 409 financings in 2011, up 9% from the 376 financings in 2010, while proceeds leapt 41%, from $2.79 billion to $3.94 billion. The number of financings and amount of proceeds were the largest in New England since 2001.

New England continues to be a leading center of activity for technology and life sciences companies. In 2011, the number of financings by life sciences companies edged out the number of financings by information technology companies, as the two sectors swapped places in the rankings again. Information technology companies accounted for 33% of New England's venture capital financings in 2011 (down from 37% in 2010) and life sciences companies contributed 36% of the region's financings (up from 35%).

New England generated four venture-backed IPOs in 2011—from BG Medicine ($35.0 million), Carbonite ($62.5 million), Tangoe ($100.9 million) and Zipcar ($174.3 million)—compared to three IPOs in the prior year.

The number of reported acquisitions of VC-backed companies in New England declined from 82 in 2010 to 73 in 2011— still the second-highest figure since 2007. The region produced three of the nation's 10 largest deals of 2011: the acquisition of Advanced BioHealing by Shire for $750 million, the acquisition of ITA Software by Google for $700 million, and the acquisition of Salient Surgical Technologies for $525 million by Medtronic. In addition, BioVex Group was acquired in 2011 by Amgen for $1 billion (including potential milestone payments).

We expect New England—and Massachusetts in particular—to remain one of the country's most appealing environments for emerging companies and a hub of venture capital and IPO activity during the coming year. Year-to-date liquidity highlights include the acquisition of Kiva Systems by Amazon.com for $775 million and the IPOs of Demandware ($101.2 million), Merrimack Pharmaceuticals ($105.3 million) and Verastem ($63.3 million).

Tri-State

The number of reported venture capital financings in the tri-state region of New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania increased from 479 in 2010 to 495 in 2011—the region's highest annual tally since 2000—while proceeds rose from $3.31 billion to $3.67 billion. New York led the region's financing activity, with 317 financings—once again just behind Massachusetts in the state rankings. Underscoring the pronounced shifts in tri-state investments over the past decade, between 2001 and 2011, the number of financings in New York increased by 45%, while deal flow was relatively constant in Pennsylvania and dropped by more than half in New Jersey.

Information technology companies garnered the largest share of the tri-state region's VC financing market in 2011, with 28% of the region's financings, up from 25% in 2010. Life sciences companies, after leading the tri-state region's rankings in 2009, accounted for only 17% of the region's financings in 2011, down from 24% in the prior year.

After generating a robust total of eight VC-backed IPOs in 2010, the tri-state region had one solitary IPO in 2011—the $42.0 million offering of Pacira Pharmaceuticals—as exit activity shifted toward acquisitions.

Reported acquisitions of venture-backed companies in the tri-state region increased 9%, from 89 in 2010 to 97 in 2011, on the heels of the doubling of VC-backed company M&A activity from 2010 to 2011. The region's largest deal of 2011 was the acquisition of Quidsi by Amazon.com for $545 million.

We believe that, over the coming year, the tri-state region's strengths in the life sciences and information technology industries—particularly in the consumer Internet space—will continue to foster a favorable environment for VC-backed startup companies and produce viable IPO and acquisition candidates. Year-to-date liquidity highlights include the IPOs of EPAM Systems ($72.0 million) and FX Alliance ($62.4 million).

To read the rest of this Report, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

More Popular Related Articles on Corporate/Commercial Law from USA
Last month, the National Association of Corporate Directors took a stab at identifying ground rules in its "Directors’ Guide" to corporate board and committee minutes.
Hardly a day goes by without hearing horrible stories of a person having their identity stolen and their finances ruined as a result.
Doing business in New York can be performed through a number of legal structures ranging from sole proprietorships to corporations.  This advisory provides basic information on the different legal forms and the services that can be offered by Murray LLP for your business.
The SEC has recently announced that it entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Ralph Lauren Corp. in connection with alleged violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
The time has come to take out and refresh those business associate agreements, HIPAA privacy and security compliance manuals, and HIPAA privacy notices.
A guide to assist parties to avoid critical, but commonly overlooked, areas of liability in sale of goods transactions.
Only the owner of a trademark has standing to enforce rights under that trademark (limited exceptions exist, such as for exclusive licensees).
Provisions of the JOBS Act and two recent no-action letters for venture capital advisors initially provide a glimmer of hope.
 
In association with
Related Video
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.